Build better products with our product team
Add something that uses AI to increase an images resolution.
I know this is a complex request, but is there any chance adobe is working on an ai way to recreate/regenerate images based on a composite image to make it look seemless and not cut and pasted together? Or an easy option to add the correct shadows to a composite?
Where the three little dots are as you float over the Generative image [options] could we include reference image in Generative Fill like Text to Image in Firefly? This would allow the user to get closer to what they imagine.
When trying to find and change the shortcut for a menu item or tool, it would be super convenient to have a search field that allows users to search for said items in the "Keyboard Shortcuts and Menus" screen rather than dig through it manually.
Hello, I would like to make a recommendation for the introductionof a better way to recover deleted assets for the CC library. I accidentally deleted a group in my conpany's CC library and the undo button appeared for less than a second, when i hovered over it, it disappeared and I lost many assets in an instant. The deleted section of my Creative Cloud program showed no files and I tried to reach out to support but there was so much red tape that i gave up. I ended up having to recreate a new group and manually add all the assets again. This incident highlighted to me that CC library did not have a proper way to recover or undo deleted actions and is an unreliable place to store company assets. Simple addittions like a proper undo button, prompt for mass deletion of files and a better way to recover groups is needed.
It would be great to be able to add any metadata overlay with the overlay settings. As it is now we are limited to Source Timecode, Sequence Timecode, Markers, Sequence Clip Name, Project Clip Name, File Name, Sound Timecode, and Sound Roll. It would be great if you could choose any of the many fields in the Metadata Panel. This could also be implemented as an effect similar to or integrated into the existing clip name effect. It could also be integrated into the simple text effect. You could pick a source track and it would overlay or burn in the chosen metadata field.
Subsequence Auto-Switch Behavior in Premiere Pro 2025Dear Adobe Premiere Pro Team,I’d like to provide feedback on a change in Premiere Pro 2025 regarding the “Make Subsequence” function.Currently, when I select a portion of a sequence, right-click, and choose Make Subsequence, the program automatically:Places the new subsequence in the Timeline, andSwitches the focus away from my original sequence.This behavior introduces unnecessary interruptions to my workflow. Instead of continuing seamlessly in my main timeline, I now have to close the subsequence and re-open my original sequence, adding extra steps every time I use this feature.Why this is a problemDisrupts established workflows: Editors often use subsequences for organization, but not for immediate timeline switching.Increases friction: Each forced switch requires manual correction, which adds up significantly over the course of a project.Removes flexibility: Editing is highly personal. One-size-fits-all behaviors don’t work well in professional environments where speed and precision are essential.Suggested improvementPlease make this behavior optional. A toggle in Preferences (e.g., “Open new subsequence in Timeline on creation”) would allow each editor to choose whether subsequences auto-open or stay in the Project panel.This change would:Respect different editing styles.Eliminate unnecessary steps for users who prefer to stay in their current sequence.Make Premiere more efficient and user-friendly for a broader range of professionals.Final thoughtEvery time a workflow changes in Premiere Pro, the software becomes so complex that I end up needing to consult outside help just to keep working. I’m increasingly fed up with being forced to adapt to changes that provide no real benefit. I yearn for a future where software is designed by AI with the user’s needs at the center — and where disruptive, forced changes like this simply don’t happen.Sincerely,[Your Name]Would you like me to also make you a condensed “quick feedback” version (just a few sentences) in case you’d rather drop it into the in-app feedback box without the full letter?
If the Marathi language is not responding to your app and you do not have the Marathi font, then I think Adobe should work on this because it will be easier for a Marathi person to handle it. I hope you will do something about this soon, your Adobe member.
I would love to get an option to let LR automatically delete images from the card after they have been successfully imported. Images on the card that have not been imported, are let alone, of course. It would serve two purposes for me: 1. It would save me deleting the images manually. 2. It would dramatically improve the experience of importing images from one card into different catalogs. An incremental import of subsets of images on one card into a single catalog (but e.g., different folders) is well supported by the "New Photos" filter in the import dialog. However, when I switch catalogs while downloading images from a card -- because some subset of images on the card needs to go into a different catalog -- the "New Photos" filter no longer works. As a result, I have to remember and wade through a lot of images I already imported into a different catalog. I realise that deleting images from the card is a sensitive issue. It must not happen prior to having verified that the image indeed has been copied (or converted) to a new location. Picasa supports this double checking. As a safety net, Lightroom could offer a "restore deleted images" feature that would resurrect deleted files from cards. Users will find such a feature tremendously useful for other occasions as well. I'd be happy with the following compromises as well: * The option to delete images after import is available only if one activates a second backup location. * Images are not deleted but the tracking of which images have already been imported is extended to work across catalogs. A record of what images still need to be imported could be associated with a currently inserted card.
I'd like to see LR Classic-like plugin support for things such as https://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies or https://www.negativelabpro.com/Primarily on Desktop, but if you can do it on Mobile and Web somehow, more power to ya. I know this past thread was marked as solved:https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-ecosystem-cloud-based-ideas/p-3rd-party-plugin-support-for-lightroom-desktop/idi-p/12355007 but it was really only for the round trip feature of editing raw files. Searching on here is difficult so if an existing request exists, my apologies.
I believe the filter options need to be greatly expanded upon in Lightroom. Currently, the Filter options are: Let me explain -- I do a lot of batch editing due to the nature of my photo work. In Lightroom, when filtering images, the "Edited?" filter currently only includes "yes" or "no". While I can think of several reasons and ways to expand, an example of how this impacts my typical workflow is that images that have been rotated are included in the "yes" filter, implying that "yes, this image has been edited". I imagine the Filter options expanding to include many specific functions, relatively simliar to those we are able to choose when Copying Edits on an image. Here's that Copy Edits options menu -- imagine if when you wanted to Filter large batches of images, a similiar set of options appeared: Imagine being able to filter by if an image had the remove function used, or not. Or if images had been straightened, or not. I can't think of a photographer I know who wouldn't LOVE to be able to filter by functions like these. Hope y'all agree!
I would find it very helpful if I could add keywords to the grid paintbrush by shift clicking the keywords and the keyword lists It would speed up keywording keywording events with multiple spoadic subjects
When working with large files in After Effects, I'll often disable a layer once it's effects are applied and animated so I can focus on working on the other layers without having to worry about viewport preview times. When it comes time to render the final animation, I'll often forget to turn these layers back on, resulting in me having to render a file a second time.I'd love to be able to designate a layer to be a "Target Layer" in the way that you can designate a Guide Layer.Where a Guide Layer shows up in your viewport, but not in the final render, a Target Layer shows up in the final render, but not in the viewport.This is a feature that already exists in many 3D softwares. It would be nice to be able to do the same in After Effects.This will be a substantially quicker/cheaper alternative to having to work with proxies.
When two consecutive keyframes on the same property have the same value, the Timeline should visually indicate that they form a “hold” or plateau. For example:Draw a small horizontal connector line between them.Or tint/mark the in-between area so it’s obvious at a glance that no change happens between those keys.Why it matters:Currently, in the Timeline, even if two keyframes have the same value, there’s no visual difference compared to changing-value keys — you only see it by scrubbing or checking the value numerically. This slows down workflow when checking for “freezes” in animation, especially across many layers.Other software (like Blender or Cavalry) makes it clear visually when keys hold the same value, which helps animators quickly spot:Loops or cyclesFreeze framesPlateaus where nothing changesDetails / Proposal:Visual connectionA small flat horizontal line between identical-value keys in the Timeline view.Or a faint shading/connector overlay.Per-propertyWorks individually for Position X/Y/Z, Scale %, Rotation, Opacity, effect sliders, etc.Tolerance settingOptional preference: treat values within ±0.0001 as equal (to avoid float noise).User controlToggle in Timeline Display Settings: Highlight Identical KeyframesNon-destructive — only affects visuals, not data or interpolation.Benefits:Immediate readability of where animation changes vs. where it’s flat.Faster cleanup when you accidentally duplicate keys without meaning to.Easier to identify holds in timing workflows (common in character animation and motion graphics).Matches animator expectations from Blender/Cavalry and improves parity with those workflows.
We understand it couldn't be very real time probably but still would be nice for some micro scale errosion where slope blur is not always a good alternative .
I have not found a way to search for FOLDER names, or ALBUM names in the new Lightroom CC. If a person has nested folders or nested albums there should be a way to search for keywords in the folder or album names.
After Effects currently offers robust face tracking with detailed "Face Measurements" data, including face position, orientation, and specific metrics for eyes and mouth. This data is invaluable for driving mask animations and other effects, as highlighted in the discussion "Using Face Measurements Data to Drive Mask Animation" on the Adobe Community Forum. To further enhance these capabilities and provide even more creative control, I propose adding nose tracking data to the existing Face Measurements. Including nose-specific data, such as its position, width, and height, would significantly expand the possibilities for facial animation within After Effects. This addition would enable more precise and realistic deformations, allow for targeted mask animations around the nose area, and facilitate more nuanced character expressions. For example, animators could easily manipulate masks to simulate nose movements or attach visual effects that accurately follow the nose's dynamics. This enhancement would greatly benefit animators and motion graphic designers, offering a more comprehensive dataset for facial manipulation. It aligns with the existing strengths of After Effects in face tracking and would unlock new avenues for character animation and dynamic visual effects, making the process of creating expressive and engaging content even more efficient and intuitive.
I'm proposing an idea for an After Effects improvement: a more direct way to use the existing Face Measurements data points to drive mask animations. Imagine creating "Annoying Orange"-like videos more easily! After Effects already excels at face tracking and provides incredibly detailed "Face Measurements" data, all relative to a designated "Rest Pose" frame. This includes crucial information like:Face Position: Offset values along the x, y, and z axes.Face Orientation: Three-dimensional orientation along the x, y, and z axes.Left/Right Eye Measurements: Eyebrow Distance, Eyelid Openness, and Eye Gaze (X, Y).Mouth Measurements: Offset (X, Y) and Scale (Width, Height).Currently, after extensive searching, there isn't an explicit or straightforward method to directly import or paste this "Face Track Points" keyframe data (especially for specific features like the mouth) onto a mask. While general track data can be copied and pasted as text, and methods like "Points Follow Nulls" exist, a dedicated feature to convert the detailed Face Measurements into a manipulable mask path would be revolutionary. Therefore, my idea is to empower users to directly utilize detailed face measurements, such as those for the eyes and/or mouth, to dynamically create and animate masks. This feature would be particularly beneficial when masks are applied with an "add" mode. What are your thoughts on this potential enhancement? Do you foresee other practical applications, or are there existing methods that achieve similar results?
The requirement to sign out and sign in every time I work from a different computer is really annoying. I take photos for my business and depending on the time of day, need to edit them from my laptop, my office PC, my home PC, or a PC in our school's theater where the photos are taken. I often end up using all four PC's in the same day, and each time I need to switch PC's I have to (1) sign into creative cloud, (2) enter the digits of my cell phone, (3) wait for the 2FA text and enter that code, (4) enter my password, and (5) select another device to sign out of. What makes these even worse is that the sign-in is all or nothing; if I want to use Lightroom on one PC and Acrobat on another PC in the same day, under the same license, I need to sign in/out of the entire suite of software. I am the ONLY person who ever uses my account, and find this to be a completely unneccesary and time-wasting hassle. If Adobe knows which other devices are in use, why can't they simply allow up to say, five devices for the same user and enforce that no two devices are used at the same time? Like with Microsoft Office365? I am posting this here because I've send several feedback reports to this effect with no response.
Es wäre toll, wenn man die Möglichkeit hätte, mit einem Klick Dinge wie Augenringe, Hautrötungen, verfärbte Zähne und ähnliche Schönheitsfehler zu korrigieren wie bei CapCut oder in Ansätzen in Lightroom. Für kreative Arbeiten wäre es auch cool, wenn man die Möglichkeit hätte z.B. Augenfarben oder Hautfarben mit einem Klick anzupassen oder Hintergründe automatisch auszublenden oder verschwimmen zu lassen ohne es erst aufwendig selbst zu maskieren.
Es wäre sehr hilfreich, wenn man mit einem Klick ein Overlay für verschiedene Social Media Plattformen (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube Shorts) aktivieren könnte um eine Vorschau für das Aussehen des Videos auf diesen Plattformen zu haben und Safezones sofort zu erkennen. Dann würde man sofort sehen, wenn z.B. wichtige Elemente und Untertitel, Überschriften usw. in einem Bereich liegen, der später nach dem Hochladen auf diesen Plattformen von Buttons überdeckt wird.
Please make this possible as it's very usefull if you want to do it on a clip/clips and then use it in the Mogrt or change multiple clips at once before placing them to the timeline. See attachments
It's really either difficult or impossible to visually detect when a property has two keyframes that are a frame (or less than a frame) apart - and depending on the length of the timeline and its zoom level, even having 5 frames separation between keyframes is not humanly possible. Yet, this occurs more often than desired. And with the new Quick Offset feature this issue will hit more users as keyframes will occasionally lock themselves in-between frames. So, I'm looking at larger keyframe icons to depict such occurrences. It'll be great if the size can be responsive to timeline length+zoom levels. And add a threshold (in frames) for this to kick in with a default of 10 frames.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.