『アドビコミュニティフォーラム』に質問/トピックを投稿する方法
Questions
新着順
Heads up:Apple is distributing letters to owner of Final Cut Studio that those apps will not run in High Sierra, which is to be released this fall -More info here: About Apple Pro Apps and macOS High Sierra - Apple SupportWhile Final Cut Studio apps (FCP-7, Color, etc.) have been officially not supported since the introduction of FCP-X, most FCS apps (with the exception of Compressor 3.x and below) ran in some form right up to OS Sierra.This means, if you choose to upgrade your OS to High Sierra you will either need to:1) Give up functionality of all FCS appsor2) Create a dual boot computer so you can boot to an older OS to run the legacy FCS apps. This may not be viable if you upgrade hardware, as older OS's may not support any new hardware that Apple introduces, so you may not be able to dual boot to an older OS on a new machine.or3) Bunker a workstation with an older OS and move on to new hardware to run OS High SierraMtD
The software is far from finished I myself run it on 1070 ti, i7 3770k, 32 gb ddr4.Some of my peers run it on the new macpro and imac pro and similar pro workstations.Most terrible performance for the hardware it is running on. This application is so terribly written that it makes it impossible to edit in 4K (even with proxies/ingest) as of late 2018. Where amateur tools like final cut pro show no difficulties whatsoever, very, very disappointing fact.As of latest update the app has been showing more bugs than ever in history, I already use adobe software sinds quarkxpress was a competitor of indesign. So you can just take my word for it, I know how adobe software is supposed to perform.My conclusion:If you are a new user and your reading this, consider final cut proconsider affinity designer software, boycot the adobe software, because they are not working on the bugs they should be working on.I lost thousands of euro's due to corrupted projects in adobe, lost 100's hours of lost work
In the meantime, for all of us frustrated by the slow batching of proxy media in Premiere/AME... Davinci Resolve is excellently fast at batching media reliably. Then it can be reconnected after the fact in Premiere.But since you're importing clips into a fully featured (free) editor like Resolve anyway, maybe you just finish the project in that software while you're at it. Just thought I'd offer advice seeing as how I've been out of commission for 30 minutes "creating proxy jobs" for 20 RED clips.
Adobe, you just enjoy — people out of money and sticking us with — software while claiming to be leaders in content creation. I have never see a product CRASH and bug out so much as the lineup of software you provide.AND PLEASE give me your stock-standard copy n' paste bs reply.Moderator Warning: Do not use profanity in these forums, it is against our community guidelines.
You're discontinuing Adobe Story for a few reasons, one of which is because not too many people used it. Please realize that people don't want to place their screenplay(s) on the internet when NOTHING is 100% secure online. A lot of people need screenplay software that would allow easy, automatic placements of camera shots, lighting, notes and so on, but will not risk having their work online when people have the ability to hack servers.Imagine the screenplay to The Avengers: Infinity War, a movie that made over $2 billion, was stored in Adobe Story, and then someone hacks Adobe and posts the screenplay online for everybody to read before filming even began. Screenplay software ALWAYS has to be confined to people's personal computers, it's a no-brainer.Thanks,JL
hi this is sai i want to buy a editing software for youtube videos i did know which is better can you please suggist me make me simple
I have tried through Adobe Edinburgh to get someone from Adobe Story to view this thread. I do have many connections on LinkedIn to most of the Adobe Global Team. Will try messaging them. Could those you have contributed her (not my thread but started by "Glasutin") to try and encourage as many in their work or social circles as possible to contribute. Its not until you go looking at the alternatives that you learn how good Adobe Story is, and the includes the new FD. Its collaboration tool appears very cumbersome. Adobe will listen if enough people are motivated to speak out. Shantanu Narayen has said as much at each conference. So can we start all spreading the word further? Thanks
Yeah after the update to resolve 15 I am spending more and more time learning the program. We shoot a compressed Raw on the Blackmagic Ursa mini pro that can't be read in Premiere so I have to say after 19 & 1/2 years using Premiere we might be looking to slowly switch our entire editing team away from Adobe based on this, the lack of Metadata support, and the super buggy April update of Premiere. I mean I am sure Adobe doesn't care about us and our 5 CC subscriptions enough to bring back Adobe Story but for the first time in almost 20 years I am seeing an actual viable alternative for our Mixed OS environment.
All Adobe software is now too expensive, The creative suite is ludicrously overpriced. I am looking at all the alternatives, Adobe don't have a monopoly on good products. They have treated customers shabbily.
Agree 100%. Well, except switching to FCP. I'll be 100% honest. I STILL prefer to cut in media composer, PPro is still the most robust software package for most of today's edit needs. It's not the best. But it's the one that meets the most needs of the most kinds of productions, and unless a workflow never changes from project to project, I have to concede it's the best option. But, realistically, Adobe should not get complacent here. Adobe is the industry standard across a bunch of industries and swaths of industry, but that doesn't mean they're the favorite. I've been using Adobe products since 1995, and they've usually served me well. I also used Media Composer for a good 10 years and prefer its intuitive workflow for editing. And I used FCP, not because I wanted to, but because some post houses are FCP houses. At this point, while I have preferences, those don't drive my decision in software use. It's all logis
Surprised this has not ben picked up in the PR forums, or did I miss it? Saw a post on a non-Adobe site, but see now that this blog entry was posted in August:Adobe Video and Audio Apps: Upcoming Changes to OS Support | Adobe Blog
Hi,I'm using Adobe Premiere 12.1.2 for a project which requires video capture. Adobe Premiere creates .mov files when using the video capture feature. Upon finishing the video capture, I am prompted to name the file and a .mov file is created. As far as I can tell there is no way to choose a different file format. For shorter files, everything plays fine. For longer files (approx 120 minutes or so), it imports audio only. No video. I've found a workaround by installing an older version (12.0.1) but I am prompted with this message upon launch:"32-bit QuickTime support endingSupport for import/export of legacy 32-bit QuickTime media will be discontinued in a future version of Premiere Pro. Transcode to a non-legacy format to continue using the media in Premiere Pro after legacy support has ended."I'm all for moving on if you don't want to support QuickTime, but why does Adobe Premiere create these files during video capture without leaving an option to create a more compatible file forma
Adobe has got to go, they cannot keep up with the times... too busy making new programs that no one asked for. Funny how Premiere alleges to be able to edit anything, until it can't... then the community professionals come out with the cult of hidden knowledge of what codecs and containers actually work with Premiere, then when you try those it still doesn't work.Have you tried DaVinci Resolve?It... what's the word I'm looking for...ah yes, it WORKS!
What are some good Premiere Pro Alternatives since Premiere has turned into total garbage?I'm a very angry user who's been trying to get this damn program to stop crashing for what seems like months now ... I'm fed up!
https://forums.adobe.com/people/R+Neil+Haugen schriebI understand the frustration. I'm a user like yourself and have needed to stay on an earlier build for several months til a fix came out myself.Hi Neil,it would be a start, if ADOBE at the IBC not only oneGLAMOR party celebrates,but with dennen,who pay for your licenseslet's talk about the last —and if you want to change that,speakModerator Warning: Please do not use profanity in our forum. We have minors reading here. You've been warned several times before. This forum is for troubleshooting not rants.
THANK YOU ALL FOR POSTING...I've been saying all this on here for weeks, Adobe loves to sweep it under the rug.One ACP told me it's normal for software to update and then not work as well as it used to on the same thing because it the software improved... which doesn't make sense in any way shape or form.Adobe doesn't test it's products and doesn't care because it has our money...I recommend taking these issues to the BBB :Adobe Systems, Inc. | Better Business Bureau® Profile
This is probably one stupidest advise I ever heard.
Not sure if I can sell it and would probably need to check it out with Adobe, this lot cost me a lot of money CS4 - 5.5 and 6 upgrade and I'd like to get something back (now retired).
Why my internet explorer cannot play flash video?
After using Audition 6 for years, finally broke down and gave Audition CC a try.It just isn't worth what Adobe is asking for it.I won't try and debate you out of it. Clearly your market research shows enough people are willing to pay it. I mean, not only did I think it was overpriced before, but now you had the audacity (get it? "Audacity"? The free sound editor) to actually raise the price even more.Oh well. I have money burning in my pocket and am more than willing to pay a subscription for it. I do with Microsoft Office, which seems to manage a year's worth of sub for $70, not the $239.88 you're asking.But you're going to have do to a lot better than $19.99/month. Especially considering that once I let the subscription lapse, I lose access to all my work structures. (Movie Magix keeps the software running after the subscription lapses, you just don't get updates anymore.)Clearly, some people feel that price is worth it. I won't try to talk t
Do any forum users or Adobe staff know if Premier Pro is going to be optimised or upgraded to match or better the rendering and export performance of Apple's final Cut?From all reviews I have seen, it seems Premier Pro is way behind in this area and is considerably slower. As I understand it, given the same hardware, Final Cut is much faster as it has been optimised. As CS is one of the leading software packages for creatives, I am surprised that this performance issue has not been addressed by Adobe by now. Maybe it is more difficult than appears but I would still like to know what, if anything, is being done or planned to close the gap.I would have thought this is really important to most editors and Adobe would be trying to achieve the best performance and be the class leader.Thank You
Contact the Better Business Bureau and complainAdobe Systems, Inc. | Better Business Bureau® Profile The first Adobe staff member I got in contact with over my escalation shrugged me off and told me to contact the regular support (????)It's ok though, I can keep writing in complaints...
I'm so sorry,You're going to hate Premiere.It will give you problems you never imagined you would have while editing.
Red Frames on a Proxy?????Wow!!! Hope I never see that (and know I will be seeing it by this weekend)Can't wait for Adobe to act like red frames on a proxy they created isn't their problem, just like every other problem their software has.
Remix with Firefly Community Gallery
Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.
すでにアカウントをお持ちですか?ログイン
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? アカウントを作成
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.