Skip to main content
Participant
April 11, 2023
Answered

Help with rejection due to quality issue. AI Generate Illustration

  • April 11, 2023
  • 2 replies
  • 399 views

Hello everyone!

I would like some assistance regarding the reason for the rejection of 2 images. The official information is "quality issue" and in my limited experience with AI-generated illustrations, I couldn't find the possible reasons for the rejection.

Both illustrations are over 12MB, do not depict images of people, and were created from my own prompts, without any type of copying from any existing ones.

I appreciate anyone who is willing to collaborate!

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

The quality issue has to do something with the quality of the assets, not the size of the file.  As for the rest, I agree with @George_F .

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td-p/13549435

2 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
April 11, 2023

The quality issue has to do something with the quality of the assets, not the size of the file.  As for the rest, I agree with @George_F .

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td-p/13549435

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
George_F
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 11, 2023

Greetings!

 

After a deep dive into both of these, here is what I noticed:

 

-Max Ernst Style:  This one appeared soft in the details at 100% view.  There were some random artefacts, and many places that faded between sharp and blurry.

 

-Remedios Varos Style:  This one appeared both soft in the details and also dark.  The histogram confirmed what would be considered underexposure.  I know this is an illustration, but I don't think it would print well and that would be a consideration.  Many of the structures seem to be formed together in an odd way. 

 

I hope that helps and you have better luck with future submissions.

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
Participant
April 11, 2023

I really appreciate your comments and observations. I will take them into consideration, in my future illustrations. I think that, being a developing field, AI-generated illustrations should have a specific module for guidance and frequently asked questions. It would greatly help all those interested.

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 11, 2023

@Abambo has provided above a link for a very comprehensive Help Page on Generative AI. In addition, there's a page of FAQ's which should provide all of the info you're looking for. Have you read them yet?

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-faq.html

Jill C., Forum Volunteer