Got you! Thanks for clearifying this. I'll let you know when it is accepted. Is there any privileges for "older" accounts? Are their Ai illustrations bein greviewed faster than those who are kust begginers on Adobe stock?
Got you! Thanks for clearifying this. I'll let you know when it is accepted. Is there any privileges for "older" accounts? Are their Ai illustrations bein greviewed faster than those who are kust begginers on Adobe stock?
By @O’Neil
That's not what Adobe said. Adobe only said that for some submissions, you may experience a greater delay, if the moderator flags that submission for additional vetting, for example if there are doubts about IP protected content. You will see that only, if you submitted different assets, and some of those assets take longer to get moderated.
Except for this, moderation is on a first come, first served rule. However, with generative AI, and the possibility to generate massively assets, many contributors are submitting hundreds of assets in a row per day. Formerly, artists were able to submit less frequently such amounts of assets. As a photographer, When I have a day's shooting, I need at least 3 to 4 days to sort out the pictures and edit them. When I could submit then all good pictures, I would be able to submit 20 to 50 assets. And correct titleing and keywording would also take time.
If you are able to submit 500 assets every second day, and that by hundreds of contributors, you are rapidly clogging the system, as Adobe does probably not add many more moderators, to get 50 times as much easter egg motives as normally. Customers wont buy more assets than before, so there need only be a moderate influx of new assets. And to be clear: the customer is the target of Adobe with Adobe stock. The contributor is only a tool, you or me or @Nancy OShea or @George_F, who cares who's assets get approved first, except the concerned contributors themselves. Adobe sells as well any asset.
AdChoices