Quality Issues

4912: There is still a light noise level to see, but I think the major problem with this picture are artefacts like this:

And then you have these points that look like sensor spots:

I would edit them out. You can refine your editing and then resubmit.

Check here for more information on refusals. If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td-p/13549435

I picked two photos to review in depth, here are my thoughts:

549A2212:  When zooming to 100% view, the details of the bird and buoy appear blurry and hidden in the shadows.  There is a slight but noticeable halo around the bird.  There are dust spots, light spots, or artefacts that should probably be removed.  Looking at the Histogram, the blacks need to be pulled down a bit, and the whites need to be pulled up a bit.  I'm on the fence as to whether this photo appears too stylized.  Leaving some room for further adjustment by the customer definitely makes it a more useful commercial asset.

20230522_125240:  Zooming in to 100% view, focus appears soft to me.  There are also halos and artefacts around the buildings.

I hope that helps!