Participating Frequently

Answered

InDesign Share for review - Images are blurry

51 replies
11139 views
Translate

Hi, when I prepare an InDesign file using "Share for Review" feature, the images are exported out rather low resolution / blurry as seen here:https://assets.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:913908ef-996f-4b5f-b99d-f730a011bda9?view=published

These images are quite hi-res in the original document and look fine in InDesign, but they are overly compressed when viewed in the review pane. The original source images are in PNG format.

Performance

Rishabh_TiwariCorrect answer

Legend

Hi ,

Thank you for reaching out. We have received a similar request on the Adobe InDesign UserVoice, and as per the comments from our Engineering team, "Share for Review is to quickly share a design that is still a work-in-progress with the Reviewer(s) for quick feedback. Since the review opens in a browser for the reviewer, it has to load quickly even on slow networks, that’s why the image quality has been kept low deliberately so that the page loads quickly without long wait times. Using high-res views will slow down the loading of pages in the browser considerably, marring the experience". Having said that, I'll share your feedback with the team and you can do that too by posting a new request.

Thanks

Rishabh

doriley

Participant

Another vote and feedback to be able to adjust the resolution of images when we share for review. Many of my clients cannot get past the low resolution look and just will not be able to focus on reviewing the document until that is resolved. Please pass this along and share with the team at Adobe. We are a smart group of users and have knowledge on how/when to use low resolution vs high files. Thanks.

Translate

Abhishek Rao

Community Manager

Hi @doriley,

Thanks for sharing your feedback. I completely understand how important it is to have control over image resolution during review.

I’ll definitely pass this along to the product team for their consideration. Really appreciate you taking the time to highlight this!

Best,

Abhishek

Translate

R

Rob22922348t1ib

Participant

Hi
I am struggling with a SVG file that blurs in share for review.

This is odd as its the only time this has happened and I have worked on various other documents with hi res images no problem. It looks really poor to send for approval.

Translate

xspace

Participating Frequently

....same issue...I use PDF in the future...with that bad quality it´s not possilbe to get a o.k. from the client. Maybe Adobe will kill this feature like other softwares.

(Thank you Adobe for raising the subscription prices and killing another Software like XD...well done!) Before you do that you should check your AI if it works correctly...midjourney is much far better for less money.

Translate

Mike Witherell

Community Expert

"deliberately kept low"

How low? What ppi and compression level did the Adobe engineers elect to use?

Translate

Mike Witherell

L

Laubender

Community Expert

Hi Mike,

it's not only low quality of images. There's more ( or if you prefer ) less to it:

Overprinting does not work at all.

For years now I suggest the equivalent of the following PDF settings for export with Share For Review:

Regards,
Uwe Laubender
( Adobe Community Expert )

Translate

Tyler Lukey

Participating Frequently

Are there any updates being made to this feature? I'd love to have at bare minimum a setting where I can control the dpi of the raster image outputs. Please.

Translate

Rishabh_TiwariCorrect answer

Legend

Hi ,

Thank you for reaching out. We have received a similar request on the Adobe InDesign UserVoice, and as per the comments from our Engineering team, "Share for Review is to quickly share a design that is still a work-in-progress with the Reviewer(s) for quick feedback. Since the review opens in a browser for the reviewer, it has to load quickly even on slow networks, that’s why the image quality has been kept low deliberately so that the page loads quickly without long wait times. Using high-res views will slow down the loading of pages in the browser considerably, marring the experience". Having said that, I'll share your feedback with the team and you can do that too by posting a new request.

Thanks

Rishabh

Translate

M

miket21014843

Participant

The issue is fast load times don't matter if what appears afterwards is unusable for review purposes (as many of us have said in this thread).

Translate

G

gHowarth

Participating Frequently

Can we get an update on this? Every png/jpg image in links I share looks low res - and each time I have to tell the client "no, it's just Adobe's Share for Review feature, don't worry" - it reduces their confidence in the platform.

Translate

C

Craig29210919lf7q

Participant

If you can do your artwork in Illustrator it produces a higher resolution image. Not ideal, but if it is only a one page doc, copy your InDesing file to Illustrator and then share it for review.

Translate

L

Laubender

Community Expert

Hi @Craig29210919lf7q ,

interesting to see that "Share For Review" done with Adobe Illustrator will yield to better results.

Still, I have to test this with Illustrator. And also if overprinting elements are showing the overprinting effect for example.

Thanks,
Uwe Laubender
( Adobe Community Expert )

Translate

A

Andrea25447791n208

Participant

I'm having the exact same issue.

It's too blurry and it makes no favour to all my hard work. I rather export as pdf and get my comments in another plataform.

Translate

A

Andrea25447791n208

Participant

This issue has been around for 2 years with no solution.

Translate

Tyler Lukey

Participating Frequently

Still waiting on this. 3 years now.

Translate

victoriak75216465

Participant

Did this ever get resolved? I have seen some Adobe employees saying standard practice as it's used to share work in progress and made to be quick so makes the resolution of images smaller, it's only for internal use etc...

But at my place of work we are using this to share designs with clients too, so they can comment their amends to us, pin to specific pages and avoids the client keeping files that aren't finalised and having the wrong one on file. It streamlines the process when designing websites in XD and sharing with the client, they get to see the site look as realistic as possible and makes feedback easier so would be great to see in the same quality on other Adobe products.

Translate

M

miket21014843

Participant

Even when you're only using them internally, internal stakeholders are going to see a very low-res image and say "hey that image is too low res." It's useless to use this as a solution for reviews when you have to say "oh ignore the pixelated images" and then do a separate review later as a PDF to get approval on the image quality.

Translate

cbesett

Inspiring

I was hoping there was something I was doing - but to find out this is just how it is supposed to be? No. I can't constantly explain why everything looks terrible. No client will understand "that's just how it is" and sign off on something or even give feedback without constantly asking why things look bad. Vectors look great -- it's just rasterized images.

Translate

Show more replies

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.