I agree- "ppi" is only a 'reference'.
But- there are people in this world that do not understand.
My case- I submitted an image 6016x4016 pixels for a newspaper advertisement,
the 'junior' type-setter contacted me to say my image was not "detailed" enough for a newspaper advertisement.
On investigation I had exported if full-size at 72ppi, so "72ppi" was seen by the type-setter as "low quality".
Nothing would convince him/her that it had all the "quality" it needed. Only a re-submission of the file with an embedded 300ppi reference would be accepted.
And I have books on Photoshop and 'Digital photography' written 10-15 years ago that will perpetuate the "ppi/dpi" confusion if a reader is to believe what was written.