Generative Fill Guidelines / Generative Füllung Block sobald etwas Haut zu sehen ist.

Forum|Forum|1 year ago
February 22, 2025
2 replies
277 views

Hallo zusammen,

ich bin als Fotograf aktiv und nutze Photoshop regelmässig für meine kreativen Projekte. Was mich aber immer wieder erstaunt: Die Generative Fill-Funktion blockiert schon bei minimal sichtbaren Hautanteilen – ob bei Strandaufnahmen in Badehose, Babybauch-Fotos oder auch bei anderen künstlerischen Gestaltungen.

Ich frage mich, was hier genau das Problem sein soll. Welche Inhalte sollen eigentlich verhindert werden? So unproblematische Bildinhalte blockiert die Funktion und schränkt den kreativen Spielraum massiv ein. Falls Adobe diese Filterentscheidungen nicht besser umsetzen kann, stellt sich doch die Frage, ob man überhaupt von einer sinnvollen AI-Lösung sprechen kann.

Habt ihr ähnliche Erfahrungen gemacht? Wie geht ihr damit um, und habt ihr vielleicht Tipps, um diesen Einschränkungen zu entgehen? Ich bin sehr gespannt auf eure Meinungen und Anregungen.

Beste Grüsse

macOS

JR Boulay

Community Expert

"Habt ihr ähnliche Erfahrungen gemacht? Wie geht ihr damit um, und habt ihr vielleicht Tipps, um diesen Einschränkungen zu entgehen? Ich bin sehr gespannt auf eure Meinungen und Anregungen."

Yes, see: https://community.adobe.com/t5/photoshop-ecosystem-bugs/photoshop-turns-35-and-ai-generative-guidelines-violation/idi-p/15167796#M119348

Acrobate du PDF, InDesigner et Photoshopographe

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

AI is far from perfect. I rarely use it. Among other things, AI struggles with skin tones, frequently blocking or generating unnatural results.

Possible workarounds:

Smaller selection areas:

Try selecting smaller portions of skin at a time to increase the chances of successful generation.

Adjusting clothing color:

If editing clothes near skin, consider slightly adjusting the clothing color to differentiate it from the skin tone.

Using alternative tools:
For more precise skin adjustments, rely on traditional editing tools like the clone stamp or healing brush instead of AI.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

P

PhotographtasticAuthor

Participant

Yes, it really is incomprehensible, well I just can't seem to understand why. And then they want credits from us for that.
I hope a Chinese tool will deliver soon 🙂 so that Adobe realize that you have to do something:

It's a shame that such strong restrictions are being made, I photograph people and they have skin, it would be bad if they didn't. 🙂

So I'll probably have to look for an alternative.

But thank you again

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

I haven't met an AI image generator yet that didn't struggle with human anatomy. They often botch facial features, fingers, toes, skin, hair, eyes, and apparel. It's the nature of the beast.

Some machines perform better than others, but ultimately they do what they're told to do. They generate output based on the data samples with which they were trained.

I have a love/hate relationship with AI. I love it as a design tool, the way an artist loves brushes & pigments. But as a replacement for human talent, there are still boat loads of room for improvement. 😏

I mainly use AI as inspiration for manually created artwork. In that way, I maintain control & ownership rights over the final product.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded