Searchable Image vs. Searchable Image (Exact) - Quality of OCR
I work in the legal field, and have always used the "Searchable Image (Exact)" setting when running OCR in-house on document productions. I'm currently using Acrobat X when I do my own OCR.
I have a vendor who says they use Acrobat 9 "Searchable Image" for all their document productions. They say even though the actual image of the document is altered, they get better quality OCR results than they do with "Searchable Image (Exact)." They say the document is deskewed so text can be read better by the OCR engine.
My problem is that many documents are being altered. Especially architectural drawings are tilting drastically to the right, the edge of the drawing is being clipped off entirely from the document, and dotted lines are being added to the image itself -- apparently where the edge of the page used to be. This is unacceptable. They say the entire drawing is being flipped so that the first few lines of text on the drawing is horizontal. So if there is a small bit of text which is slanted, the entire drawing is tilted to adjust to that one piece of text.
Is it true that OCR is that much better using "Searchable Image" vs. "Searchable Image (Exact)"? I have to select one setting for all docs, and I'm inclined not to alter our documents in any way at the expense of OCR.
They also say that they're having trouble OCRing docs that I can OCR without a problem using both Acrobat 8 and Acrobat X. Does that make any sense? I switched directly from 8 to X so I'm not familiar with Acrobat 9.
