AI image not keyworded as AI

[ShouresSoote]

Hello,

After some searching it appears there is no built-in method of reporting AI images that aren't tagged/keyworded as such, and instead the recommended method of reporting these images is just to link them here in the forums.

This image is AI generated but is not marked as AI:

https://stock.adobe.com/1714652487

Thank you.

[daniellei4510]

@Contributor1 can have a look. Seems the contributor's omissions were oversights, as some are labeled correctly. Nevertheless...

[Abambo]

You need to report them here. @Contributor1 will get the asset checked and if your appreciation is correct, Adobe will remove it. 

[ShouresSoote]

Thanks very much. By "here" I assume you mean this forum? In the future should I also tag Contributor1 as you and Daniellei have done?

[ShouresSoote]

Looking through this contributor's portfolio, I'm pretty sure nearly all of them are AI generated but unfortunately they're not all tagged as such.

[ShouresSoote]

Apologies for posting more, but this is another contributor that also produces all (or most) AI content, but not all are tagged properly. Here is one of the images in question:

https://stock.adobe.com/540053556

Thanks again.

[Abambo]

Yes, here is this forum, and feel free to tag Contributor1. His team will check the assets (again) and then take a decision. If you have bought the asset and spent a precious credit for it, he will also be able to refund you.

[ShouresSoote]

Awesome, thank you very much @Abambo.

[daniellei4510]

Correct. It's a big no-no. One is an accident and must be removed. When it's done over and over, those accounts are disabled, at least until the matter is corrected.

[Abambo]

No need to apologize, to the contrary. It's a shame that such an asset did pass asset moderation.

[ShouresSoote]

Yeah, some of them are particularly aggregious. I can only assume they were submitted before tagging rules were in place, but when you're working under strict "no AI allowed" contracts it makes things difficult.

[daniellei4510]

No need to apologize. As a contributor who only submits AI myself, it's frustrating to see this happening as often as it does. Competing against other AI submissions is difficult enough; I don't want to have to compete with so-called "photographs" as well. 🙂

[Contributor1]

Hello @ShouresSoote, I've sent the details of image 1714652487 and 540053556 to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the images.

[ShouresSoote]

Awesome, thanks so much!