Hi alisterblack.. Thanks for your response.
But, how can I know the cause of "selected package is corrupt"..? I never touch that .ccp file.
I downloaded the full package some months ago in one virtual machine which already been deleted. I got the full package of 13 GB then I moved them to my file server and now it is successful to be deployed with 2,5 hours to complete each computer. So this full package is valid, however the time to deploy is unacceptable and I need to edit the package. How come your package manager refer to cache instead of the full package that is already downloaded completely?
Can you make your Adobe Package Manager has ability to edit my downloaded package? Or alternatively, is there any other method to deploy/install the selected Adobe program one by one?
I hope you know how it is
-when it takes 2,5 hours to complete the installation to a client computer with Core i7, 16 GB of RAM
-when it takes the whole night (more than 7 hours) to download some gigabytes of your packaged while my internet connection is 80 Mbps
-when I re-download to re-build the package, the chance to success is 50% with the same error message [ERROR] AdobePackageBuilder - Failed to unzip the file blablabla..
Thank you for your understanding.
Hi,
The .ccp file that you are loading is actually just a small xml file that should only be a few kilobytes. It contains pointers to cached downloads, and you state that you have deleted these cached downloads.
Each time you build a package you could be using different parameters. For example named user or serialized deployment. Editing the .ccp file only allows you to change the applications and updates included not any of the other details such as licensing information and how to handle updates.
If you only wish to deploy certain individual applications I would suggest building a package containing just that application. There are no limits in the packager concerning which of your licensed applications you include in your package, what you call it or how many packages you build. I think that would save you some time and give you a bit more flexibility, after all it is probably the case that not all your users need all the software in CC.