Skip to main content
Inspiring
February 26, 2021
Answered

Convert Type on a path elipse back to elipse

  • February 26, 2021
  • 5 replies
  • 1404 views

I want to convert a Type on a Path elipse back to an ordinary elipse. I've tried Effect>Convert to Shape>Elipse>Shape options without success. Must have done this in the past but can't think how. Thoughts, anyone? 

Thanks

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Jacob Bugge

Michael,


Below is a longer and hopefully more intelligible version of my suggestion, based on the (mis)understanding that you wish to go back to the original plain/notext ellipse.

 

If you wish to have both the ellipse and the Type, just skip 4).

 

And the rest of what Hans-Jürgen said.

 


You can:


1) Click an empty spot to deselect your Path Type;

2) ClickDrag with the Direct Selection Tool while holding Alt (for Win) or Option (for Mac) over the ellipse (away from the Type) with the Direct Selection Tool to select just that; you can do that in the upper part well away from the actual Type at the bottom;

3) Hold Ctrl (for Win) or Cmd (for Mac) while you press C and then B to have a new independent path beneath the Path Type;

4) Switch to the (normal) Selection Tool, then Click the Path Type (easy to see/do at the bottom) and press Delete so you only have the ellipse from 3); as another way of selecting the original Path Type you can also click it in the expanded Layers palette.

 

5 replies

Jacob Bugge
Community Expert
February 27, 2021

For my part you are welcome, Michael.

 

There are many small vital things to know, and remember.

 

New Participant
April 20, 2024

Thanks fix my issue as well

Jacob Bugge
Community Expert
April 20, 2024

You are welcome, Dow.

 

The Getting back to the Type on a Path path thread lives.

 

Inspiring
February 27, 2021

Hi @pixxxelschubser appreciate the contribution. Jacob's solution below works.

 

Michael

Jacob Bugge
Jacob BuggeCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 27, 2021

Michael,


Below is a longer and hopefully more intelligible version of my suggestion, based on the (mis)understanding that you wish to go back to the original plain/notext ellipse.

 

If you wish to have both the ellipse and the Type, just skip 4).

 

And the rest of what Hans-Jürgen said.

 


You can:


1) Click an empty spot to deselect your Path Type;

2) ClickDrag with the Direct Selection Tool while holding Alt (for Win) or Option (for Mac) over the ellipse (away from the Type) with the Direct Selection Tool to select just that; you can do that in the upper part well away from the actual Type at the bottom;

3) Hold Ctrl (for Win) or Cmd (for Mac) while you press C and then B to have a new independent path beneath the Path Type;

4) Switch to the (normal) Selection Tool, then Click the Path Type (easy to see/do at the bottom) and press Delete so you only have the ellipse from 3); as another way of selecting the original Path Type you can also click it in the expanded Layers palette.

 

Inspiring
February 27, 2021

Your solution worked and just would never have occured to me. Greatly appreciate you taking time to explain all this in detail – such small, but vital things, really help with production.

 

Michael

pixxxelschubser
Community Expert
February 27, 2021

Hi @Michael5ED9 

if @Jacob Bugges post don't answer your question ( I would have given you the same answer) - say you need a duplicate of the circle for a second lettering at the top of the circle.

 

Please explain a bit more in detail what you really want.

for example:

  • a duplicate of the circle without text
  • the same circle but lost all the type
  • change type into paths and lost the circle
  • or something else???

 

What is your final goal?

Jacob Bugge
Community Expert
February 26, 2021

Michael,

 

You can (after deselecting if selected) Alt/OptionClickDrag over the ellipse (away from the Type) with the Direct Selection Tool to select just that, then Ctrl/Cmd+C+B to have a new independent path beneath the Path Type, then just delete the latter.

 

Inspiring
February 27, 2021

Thanks Jacob

 

Not quite getting it, so maybe I didn't explain it properly. Please see the attached.

 

Michael