Skip to main content
Inspiring
February 17, 2010
Question

why is illustrator better than corel? [locked]

  • February 17, 2010
  • 15 replies
  • 78302 views

hello forumers.

im an illustrator freak, but my annoying boss wants me to learn corel ;-( ,i need some facts why illustrator is better than corel so i can shove his face in it if possible.

VIVA illi

thank you very much.

[This discussion is from Feb 17, 2010 9:58 AM and is more than eight years old. It is now locked. Please start a new thread, as both products have changed.]

This topic has been closed for replies.

15 replies

New Participant
August 19, 2014

I have used both CorelDraw and Illustrator since the earliest versions and am using the current versions.  I won't repeat the great write-ups (right-ups?) earlier in this conversation that definitively and correctly illustrate the differences.  As an industrial designer that designs point of purchase displays, CorelDraw wins hands down.

Aside from those attributes listed above, I have two reasons for making this blog entry: one practical - CorelDraw is terribly faster for my work, and one altruistic - I dislike most aspects of Adobe from their culture to their practices relating to their software that doesn't always work anyway.  Illustrator sells because it's the best thing that will work on a Mac. Period. 

Details: My work entails creating a presentation drawing to sell the job and then communicate with the maker-types to create a prototype.  Follow-up drawings are a dream where in Illustrator it is a chore.  Finally, contract drawings are created which amount to engineering drawings.  I used to do this in an Autodesk CAD program but 'Draw can do it faster and cheaper.  Illustrator can almost do it, and it is like pulling teeth.  Most graphic artists that work with me do not agree with all my views.  But in almost 30 years of using computer design programs as a free lance CorelDraw has always been a clear choice for me.

Participating Frequently
May 18, 2014

Lol, and you expect cons on a Adobe forum?:))

And I am a Corel freak , arround 15 years, familiar with illustrator also. If we talk about vectors then Corel is by far the best, it is straight and clean on what you have to do, with what you need to do, I'm just roaring when I must finish something in illustrator, their team it's so mind twisted about tools and ergonomics, every time I want to scream and beat somebody:)). I can assure you that you finish twice as fast in Corel, illustrator is more about creativity not for productivity, also you can paste directly in photoshop as smart object witch is the best feature of all times:), anyway, you must play with what you know better.

Inspiring
July 2, 2014

You can always cherry pick whatever perceived advantage that one piece of software has over another.  The fact is, every single piece of software has something that it does better than another.  Even Illustrator is not best at everything.  But frankly, I think the comments from MyCoalescense above are just incredibly wrong.

I don't know if Adobe is doing enough, but I feel extremely strongly that Corel is not.  How do we explain the disaster that is the undeveloped, forgotten, abandoned since the late 90's, eternally, extremely buggy Photo-Paint?  That's the only other "major" program in Corel's idea of a "suite".  It's a joke.  How does Photo-Paint compare to.  Photoshop.  I don't think they both belong in the same sentence or even in the same thread.  The difference is greater than night and day in every conceivable way.  Quality, scope, modernization, you name it.  Photo-Paint's only use is to help to call CorelDraw a suite.  If you take that dinosaur out of the box, is it still a suite?  With just the other throwaway items in the box?  Antique Font Navigator?  Crummy Corel Connect.  And a web editor that mostly Corel fans say don't bother to install?  Is that a suite?

I'm not here to really defend Adobe.  I detest the notion of renting their products forever, but I can't deny the fact that they are absolutely making the highest quality product ever.  And I appreciate their extreme reliability and quality.

New Participant
July 2, 2014

Don't know why I'm wading into this old thread, but...

I receive somewhere between 10 and 20 customer files per day. The overwhelming majority of them were produced using some version of Adobe software. Unless you want to live on an island, you use Adobe. I don't care if its the "best" or not. The fact is it has become the defacto standard.

So, if all you are doing is personal, and you will never be communicating with anyone else, pick whatever you want. Makes no difference. But if you are going to be communicating your work (ie, sending comps to your web programmer or sending PDF's to your commercial printer or whatever) you can be confident that if you send them files created with Adobe stuff, they'll be able to work with it. Send them something else and you take your chances.

JETalmage
Inspiring
February 17, 2010
Do not, I repeat do not, ask James or Scott or Hans.


Indeed.

Only ask Jacob, who is still using a four-version out-of-date copy of Illustrator and who tries to personify it as a female idol.

If the comparison is to be "fair" (which it clearly will not be, at least from your perspective), it should compare Corel Draw X4 to Illustrator CS3 or CS4. Release dates being what they were, X4 would more legitimately be considered Draw's answer to CS3; since it long predates CS4.

Talking about earlier versions of either program is not very meaningful, except in the sense of history of development. When I compare the release histories of Draw, FreeHand, Canvas, and Illustrator, Illustrator comes in an often-embarrassing last in terms of features long taken-for-granted in other programs.

im an illustrator freak,but my annoying boss wants me to learn corel...i need some facts [that] I can shove his face..

Shove in your boss's face? For presenting you an opportunity to escape fearful dependency upon a single software?

i need the pros and cons...to outline to him why illustrator is better...


Why don't you simply welcome this opportunity to actually know something about that which you claim a completely bogus "preference"?

Were you at all interested in gaining input that would help you help your boss reach a rational and objective decision, you would at least describe something about the kind of work your boss pays you to do. What kind of business employs you? Is the Macintosh platform even relevant to your boss's business market? How large a workgroup is affected by the software choice? What kind of artwork does that workgroup produce? How is it delivered? What are its initial content sources? Who are the end-users of the artwork? In how many different ways is it delivered, and in what formats?

Yet here you are, soliciting predisposed "why Illustrator is 'better' than Draw" advice from a handful of users who, so far, admit themselves having either no, or practically no, experience with Draw! If that's not blind-leading-the-blind, I don't know what is.

You are by admission predisposed toward Illustrator, even though you are not at all equipped to say why. Reason is pointless with so irrational a mindset. Since no one responding yet seems to actually know anything about Draw, I will instead offer some ammunition I hope your boss uses to see if you are even objective enough to consider it.

The following is a just-off-the-top list. Should you actually try to counter it, you should be prepared for more:

General:

Lower cost, both initially and in upgrades

Better support for non-current versions

Faster performance

Better support for several vertical-market industries (signage, embroidery, engineering-related)

More robust CAD and more business-centric import/export formats

Better multiple page implementation

Better-organized interface

Highly-customizable workspace

Features:

User-defined drawing scales

Reliable snaps

Dimension tools

Callout tools

Connector lines

Flowchart Tools

No-nonsense, 2D vector face extrusion

Live shape primitives

Smart Drawing tools (freehand shape recognition)

Virtual Segment tool

Ability to properly cut/crop vector and raster content

Contour tool (multiple parallels)

Export selection only

Barcodes

Print Merge

Bundle for Output Bureau

Scan directly into Draw

Trim (not merely mask) vector artwork to any path

Fit Text To Path

Text stats

Export artwork as Type 1 font.

Lens Fills (live details)

Live Perspective

Object Data (spreadsheet-formatted database of user-defined object data fields)

Fillet / Chamfer / Scallop

User-defined Arrowheads

Shared Features Better Implemented in Draw:

Mesh Grads

Dynamic Guides (with increment snaps)

Independent control over Snaps for Guides, Grid, Objects, Dynamic Grids

Property Bar (far more sensible and useable than AI's poorly-designed and buggy Control Panel)

Status Bar with context-sensitive instructions

Elastic Mode (vs. AI's Reshape tool)

Add/remove/line/curve/cusp/symmetrical curve commands properly implemented for all nodes (points) in a selected path

Logarithmic and Symmetrical spirals

Macro Recording (vs. AI Actions)

Envelopes (retract envelope handles without wrecking artwork)

Old-Saw Arguements Based on Overstatement, if not Myths:

Adobe's cross-app "integration" is more hype than substantive advantage.

Illustrator's text handing is worst among Adobe apps and worst-of-class among its direct competitors.

Draw opens and creates PDFs just fine.

Claims of AI superiority regarding importing of raster images is practically immaterial. In fact, Corel Draw's interaction with Corel PhotoPaint is at least as "smooth and seamless" as AI/PS, if not more so.

Using vector artwork created in Draw (or any other mainstream Bezier drawing program) in page-layout programs is no more difficult than using AI. This stuff has been being done for decades.

Again, this is just a beginning. You do yourself a huge disservice by declaring (let alone attempting to defend) a "preference" to the only choice with which you have experience (and evidently only beginning experience at that). That's true regardless of which program you claim to "favor." How can one, with any trace of intellectual honesty, claim to have a "favorite" of anything--when one has no exposure to any of the considered alternatives?

Since you already have Illustrator, you should absolutely welcome your Boss's willingness to provide you a current copy of Corel Draw. Here's an opportunity for you--at no personal cost--to actually learn something about another program; to potentially have some clue as to what you're talking about when you claim to "prefer" one over the other; to benefit from knowing more than one particular tool, and to overcome the fear of learning your way around more than one offering among similar programs. For all you know, you may be arguing against the program you would actually end up preferring.

I could also build a bullet list of better-than-Draw AI features. It would not be as long as its opposite. Nor would the AI-favoring listings be as broadly practical.

Fact is, anyone can build a bullet list to favor any of them. (Just look at the sides of the boxes, or each vendor's self-serving "competitive comparisons" on their respective websites.) Fact is, all of them are really rather mediocre; mostly 20+ years-old technology.

You really should have no axe to grind in this, unless you can state something specific to your work that strongly favors the relatively few functional advantages of AI.

JET

Jacob Bugge
Community Expert
February 18, 2010

inquestflash,

Now you know why I warned you: the assurance implied in the OP would not remain unscathed; and now it is too late, with just two out of three.

JETalmage wrote:

Do not, I repeat do not, ask James or Scott or Hans.


Indeed.

Only ask Jacob, who is still using a four-version out-of-date copy of Illustrator and who tries to personify it as a female idol.

There would be no point at all in asking Jacob, who would never dream of claiming the superiority or faultlessness of Illy, or even enter any such discussions.

Tries to?

Participating Frequently
October 30, 2013

lol ppl pls relax and kick back we are here ot solve our problems.


CorelDraw x6 vs Illustrator cs6?

I compared to both extremely closly. Ive used illustator for 10 years and watched 8+ hours of lynda.com coreldraw tutorials and done alot of research about it. During the videos when ever they did something cool or in a better or faster way id pause the video. I would open illustrator and see how it compared and most of the time illustrator could do it but differently. Some times corel won and some times illustator on doing the same things. With some the same toosl could be as easy as say right click and with an other you would have to open it through a drop down menu at the top of the program. I was skeptical of coreldraw and my bet was on illustrator but I wanted to be sure and reafirm that illustrator is the vetor drawing king. Then when people start saying what alternatives to illustrater there are I could honestly say there are none as good. Here are my findings. Please note this does not include ever single tool/fucntion for both but only the ones that stood out or key ones.

Both have:

movable windows for most everything

rotate

pen tool

custom shapes

many color options

line view mode

layers

heavy text editing tools, kern, track, lead, text styles

clipping masks

live trace/paint

a way to merge, seperate and recombine objects aka pathfinder tool

photo shop like tools for vectors as smear, pinch and more

3d rendering

both come normally with a sharing/organizing program, bridge and connect for corel

Illustrator advantages:

Industry standard

multiple art boards each with easy to change different sizes. This is very rare I need ever board different.

photo shop filters but honestly that should stay in photoshop and they are impossible to work with because every time you move the object it has to recalculate and can crash the program/computer

easier one stop shopping for text editing, adobes text editing floating window is very handy and has almost everything you would need for even advanced text editing in 1 spot

one stop shopping floating windows for several function as text that are some what easier

3d perspective tool, ive used it a few times and quite handy

CorelDraw x6 Suite advantages:

Corel can do master pages and facing pages, columns, margins and a few other bells and whistles for text so corel wins on text, first edition with text heavy tools so i expect next wil be a very viable replacement to indesign

sheer and rotate are both visable on an object at the same time, illustator it is a new tool

copy/paste, the copy pastes in the exact spot it was coppied from which saves tops of time in repositioning where with adobe you have no idea where it will appear

repeat, in adobe this repeats the last action, such as movement, scale change, rotation ect but in corel it can track the last few things dont to an object and say "ok i see a pattern each square is 50% further away than the last not just 1/2 in" and reappear complex commands like that

take a select several objects and place a effect, change or say gradient on them all with out "grouping" or a clipping mask! Time saver

cheaper, 500$ full price for CorelDraw x6 suite, only comes as package deal, price if it were possible for just draw would be about 150$

can import/export to illustator, photoshop, pdf and many more so no major comparability issues

product release every 2 years and last was in 2012 of march so next is due for 5 or so months and will upgrades to compete with illustrator

illustrator has seen no significant upgrades since cs 6 even with the cc to release them as they come

customizable floating windows, what is on them, orientation, and a few more things

buying options, perpetual lisence standard buy model cd/download, standard + premium cloud or subsciption cloud only

connect beats bridge as it can pull from more than your files but from social media, web sites and search engines and just works smoother

Web creator program included, similar to muse but wont go into it here

Photo-Paint program included, its a merger of photoshop elements and illustrator, but wont go into here

Overall im very disappointed in illustrator considering according to wikipedia adobe rakes in x15 as much $ revinue as corel. With all that $ for R&D illustrator should kick the pants off of anything anyone has to offer but because adobe has stopped focusing on core functions other programs are catching up and quick. After about cs 3 it stopped focusing on vector drawing and increasing work speed and instead just became bloat ware. Adobe stopped focusing on normal functions for each program and started tossing in tools/features from other programs that had no business being there. Such as how photoshop can edit video and illustrator can do filters but both are sad compared to the real function in the program they ripped it from. They just got bored and decided to throw them in... for some reason. Its as though the designers could not come up with anything good so just started bloating. Illustrator is still great dont get me wrong. I say corel has an edge on illustrator and indesign and if adobe is not very careful corelsdraw x7 will be a replacement for both illustrator and indesign and for 60% of the cost of just 1 program with cs 6 price models! If photo shop elements is not careful CorelDraw x7 suite will outright replace photshop elements. Draw was by every thing I saw just more intuitive and user friendly and many of the functions just worked more smoothly and gave a better user experience. That is why im leaning to get corel but i need to try the trial version first.

The jury is still out for a few months to see what corel and adobe both cook up in the next 6 months before I get my BFA in graphic design. I still have hopes for adobe but they are fading by the week. If i end up hating the trial ill go for cs 6. There is no way id go to cc, cash cow, crazy cloud, or crazy contaminent as the 38million users had their information compromised this month and found out about yesterday. They could cut the cc price to 30/month for the whole suite, allow buy out at 3 years and have a middle buy option of like your favorite 3 programs for 20/month and still no way id use it. By the way i talked to my college about cc. They as a college are not going to update for sure any faster 1 time every 4 months but more likely 2 times a year becaus its a pain to upgrade even 1 lab of 25 computers forget upgradeing several hundred for tiny upgrades and thats between semester also they dont have access to any cloud features so they are getting the bad deal.

Jacob Bugge
Community Expert
February 17, 2010

inquestflash,

Do not, I repeat do not, ask James or Scott or Hans.

Inspiring
February 17, 2010

hello jacob

who are they? :-/

Inspiring
February 17, 2010

inquestflash wrote:

hello jacob

who are they? :-/

They are James, Scott and of course Hans!

One Corel is PC only there venture into the Mac world was less than a pleasant experience.

then their priority file format brings with it some limitations and is not used s much as Illustrator and it is integrated with Adobe 's other apps
and I am not certain it is with Quark as well

Known Participant
February 17, 2010

Corel had its hayday back in the mid-late 90's. I used CorelDraw 5 when I

was starting to learn vector illustration and continued using it

exclusively through version 8, but I reached a point where I grew out of

it and moved on to Illustrator.

It has been a long time since I've used anything from Corel so I probably

couldn't fairly assess their strengths and weaknesses nowadays. Last time

I even saw their interface, it was CorelDraw 10. It seemed just "okay" to

me, but I still preferred Illustrator.

I don't think your boss should be the one to decide which software is best

for you if he is not having to use it himself everyday. That would be like

me going to the mechanic and telling him which tools he had to use to

repair my vehicle.

-JM

Inspiring
February 17, 2010

hello junk.

your absolute right about what program im  comfortable  with,but i need the pros and cons of the programs. to outline to him why illustrator is better.