Skip to main content
amaarora
Inspiring
May 2, 2019
Question

Discussion: InDesign problems and innovations...

  • May 2, 2019
  • 34 replies
  • 7646 views

Hi community members,

As users of InDesign and other lay-outing tools, I want to ask you some questions:

  • What is new in the world of document layouting? Something innovative? For example: Gridifying based on page dimensions
  • What problems are faced in the domain of typography that you think must be solved? For example: #Fontphoria: Adobe MAX 2018 (Sneak Peek) | Adobe Creative Cloud - YouTube
  • Any smart solutions or workflows you want in the product that can ease work? For example: replacing all missing glyphs in a document in one click
  • Anything out of the box workflows? For example: Automatically applying fonts to a document based on context...
  • Anything which you feel sounds cool and amazing and is useful?
  • Something which other tools do but not InDesign? For example: Messages in iOS 10: How to Use Emoji Replacement and Prediction - MacRumors

Above are just pointers i can think of right now. Would love to hear more such ideas, hurdles and other opinions... I also found one such innovative idea here: Dynamic baseline related unit of measurement – Adobe InDesign Feedback

FYI: The idea is not define the InDesign roadmap or mention bugs. We have a seperate page for that: Adobe InDesign Feedback .

The sole purpose of asking this here, is to gain understanding and knowledge regarding what concerns are facing our customers and  knowing the innovations they want in the product. (something like InDesign CC 2019 new feature - Content-Aware Fit - YouTube )

Please feel free to express your idea even if it is totally weird at its core

Thanks,

Aman

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    34 replies

    Community Expert
    July 18, 2019

    BobLevine

    I 100% agree! That is exactly where my beef is at too.

    Colin Flashman
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 18, 2019

    In answer to the original post by amaarora, I think a lot of what is being asked for could be found in the indesign.uservoice.com suggestions – as at the time of writing this post, there are over 2340 suggestions, and I agree with the top 5 (Option to split table rows across pages, MathML Support, SVG import, Make text variables/live captions breakable like normal text, Locate where a specific colour is used in your document). That said, I won't parrot the other suggestions that I agree with, needless to say the uservoice site would be a great place to start.

    Other ideas that have cropped up recently (at least in this office) have been:

    • Grammar checker similar to Grammarly;
    • Open PDFs natively in InDesign;
    • Autoformat feature similar to the Microsoft Word autoformat feature;
    • Be able to see a "rendered" preview much like RIP software such as AGFA Apogee or Fuji XMF can display;
    • A "consistency" checker. For example, a feature to check consistency of a document for how dates are written, how addresses are written, how people's names appear, how post-nominals appear etc.

    I don't necessarily agree with Eugene Tyson's comment of "there are lots of functions added to indesign over the years that are no longer viable and should be removed" as this may apply to what he is doing, but not what everyone is doing – an example of this is when Acrobat removed features they felt weren't being used, only to have backlash from the community complaining that the removed features had in fact been used. I do agree that there are features that I don't use and have probably been deprecated elsewhere.

    If the answer wasn't in my post, perhaps it might be on my blog at colecandoo!
    davidblatner
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 17, 2019

    Wow, this thread is fascinating… some great ideas + an enormous steaming heap of complaining and cynical philosophizing. Of course, complaining has its place, I suppose, but holy moley…

    Just a few points that need to be made:

    • On the question of how should the developers decide what to do: They have been very clear that they a) watch https://InDesign.UserVoice.com carefully; b) read prerelease; c) talk to large customers; and d) watch industry trends and try to innovate.
    • Eugene whinges at some length about a comment from 9 years ago, without understanding a number of the important features discussed, and then equates this with how the InDesign team is run today. Makes no sense at all.
    • "A developer" says InDesign has been "put out to pasture," apparently ignoring the many, many new features and improvements that the team has made in the past 3 years.

    Look, I want InDesign to be better/stronger/cooler as much as anyone here, but whining like a preteen doesn't help at all.

    To Barb, Kelly, Jane, Dave, and everyone else here who is providing constructive criticism with great ideas: THANK YOU! Love reading these.

    It's fun to think of how InDesign could be better, provide good background so the developers understand it… but please also make sure these ideas are collected and voted for on uservoice!

    Community Expert
    July 18, 2019

    By the way - did you read the first list I posted in this thread.  I felt it was very constructive,  non-preteeny, and non-whingy.

    As it goes with a forum - the conversation can develop, heated feelings come out, and frustration sets in, and constructive ideas can be born from a healthy, frustrated, heated feelings, debate.

    All the information in this thread is GOLD material for the InDesign team.

    I also think that InDesign User Voice should be (or at least the entire User Voice) areas should be far more accessible.

    I love them - but I often forget they even exist.

    I will definitely endeavor to promote this as much as I can.

    davidblatner
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 18, 2019

    Eugene, I apologize for not having read your earlier post… just did, and it is full of excellent ideas! Thank you, too, for your kind words about my work and the site. I'm sorry that my comment (about your later post) was overly sharp, but I do feel that you (and some other here) are being pretty harsh to the InDesign team. I don't mean to be an apologist for them, and I want to keep the pressure on them, too! But I don't think it's fair to lambast them for how they make decisions or the features they choose to work on.

    Some of the features you list (from back in CS5) were extremely powerful. For example, what they were calling "soft-bottom frames" back then is now called "Auto-Size" (in the Text Frame Options dialog box).

    We all want more (I personally have a list several pages long of features I want in InDesign, many of which I've been asking about for literally 15 years). But I don't think it's true to say we haven't seen anything important recently. True, the first 3 or 4 years of CC was pretty sparse. And true, there has been nothing truly groundbreaking. But there have been some great new features.

    James Wamser maintains a wonderful document showing all the new features, per version: https://indesignsecrets.com/indesign-new-features-guide-updated-for-cc-2019.php

    From that, I see: Publish Online, CC Libraries, Paragraph Shading and Borders, end notes, object style size/position, pdf comment import…

    By the way, I think there are five reasons why it seems like there hasn't been a lot of change in InDesign:

    • There was a surprisingly large amount of work done on under-the-hood changes and user interface changes over the past 6 years. Some of that was necessary and some was self-inflicted (such as Adobe kept changing the UI and InDesign had to "keep up").
    • There was a lot of turnover in product management, which was unfortunate but may have been inevitable as InDesign development was moved to their India office. It's been nice to see things "settling in" more, where there's more consistency and focus over the past year or two. This product needs long-term consistency and focus.
    • The product is, of course, already reasonably mature. That means each year it becomes harder to "teach an old dog new tricks." I remember talking to Douglas Waterfall 8 or 9 years ago about a feature he was working on—I think footnotes. He started to explain the complexities, and I realized that a problem that I thought would be pretty simple ("just throw them at the bottom of the frame!") was actually mind-blowingly difficult to solve. He spent over 6 months just trying to crack the puzzle of how to architect this one change (which then took even more time to actually implement).
    • The users/customers want more and more diverse things. (Bob wants them to do interactive features; Eugene wants print production and long doc improvements… the more users, the more directions the team is pulled. So the result is that we just get a little of this and a little of that.
    • A lot of work has been done on background systems that aren't necessarily direct feature improvements in InDesign: publish online, creative cloud libraries, typekit/adobe fonts, adobe stock. While many of us might question the need to do these, we have to remember that ever since Creative Suite launched, InDesign has been part of a much larger ecosystem.

    Let's keep pushing for improvements to our favorite app! But I vote we keep it positive and constructive.

    Dave Creamer of IDEAS
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 17, 2019

    This is not an exhaustive list (and some is repetitive), but here are the ones that come to mind.

    Rather than repeating everything previously posted, I'll just add easier creation and exporting if interactive documents, especially to HTML5. Shouldn't need a third-party plugin to get good output.

    Long document features (some not updated since CS3--12 years ago!)

    • Graphics
      • Fix runaround with anchored graphic for previous text flow (2-col layout with straddled graphic anchored in 2nd col.)
      • Dynamic Link to Photoshop to edit images directly in ID without switching over to PS (with layer styles)
      • Dynamic Link to Acrobat to edit PDFs directly in ID (with option to save a copy and replace with edited version)
      • Easier anchoring of multiple objects (such as graphic with caption--see below)
      • "Add a caption box" option to graphics (defaults to width of graphic, used predefined format--maybe an Object styles
    • Tables
      • Option to remember table geometry (at least table and col width) in Table Styles
      • Conditional table rows (possibly columns)
      • Table footnotes (that show at bottom of noted text on multi-page tables, not at end of table)
      • Excel linkage option upon import rather than under Preferences
      • Table style auto-assigns header rows to incoming Excel document (rather than all body rows)
    • Workflow
      • Text insets as in FrameMaker (or InCopy insets, but can be inserted inline with other text but maintain link)
      • Book folders and groups as in FrameMaker (although I would reverse how they are used: groups for multiple documents in same chapter; folders for organization)
      • Ability to turn off multiple undo's temporarily (was a big drag on system with doing InData text flow with inline graphics--I suspect is was recording each entry as an undo)
      • Easier Print Booklet to PDF option
      • Per-page layer option (split Layer panel into two sections--per document and per layer?)
      • Per-page view option for facing page documents
      • More XML features as in FrameMaker (fix it or drop it...)
    • Text
      • Track format changes in addition to text edits
      • Leading proportional to type size (like Quark--+2 or +10%)
      • Endnotes for entire book, not just per chapter
      • Wrapping text variables
      • Character styles in variables
      • "TOC" list based on character styles
      • Multiple indices
      • Easier option to right-align auto-numbering (so 1, 10, 100 align on right, not left)
    • InCopy
      • Option to prevent manual text reformatting
    David Creamer: Community Expert (ACI and ACE 1995-2023)
    Legend
    July 16, 2019

    One feature enhancement I would love (that I realize may be completely unworkable for coding reasons).

    I'd like a Find/Change and Spell Check option inside the Index Panel.

    Barb Binder
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 16, 2019

    Hi Aman:

    I forgot to add my support for better form fields properties. We have a good start, but there are many properties that can only be changed in Acrobat, which are wiped out when we re-export the PDF. And JonathanArias​ pointed out recently that form fields options could—but are not—part of object styles. Yet.

    ~Barb

    ~Barb at Rocky Mountain Training
    Document Geek
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 16, 2019
    • Ability to export notes as PDF comments. The new PDF comments feature only goes one way (when importing). And it's wonky and doesn't work well.
    • When exporting a PDF from the book panel, the PDF type defaults back to the type used when exporting from the File > Export menu. The different PDF export areas should be independent of each other.
    • In the Stroke styles dialog box, stroke weights are tied to the Document Units of measurement, not the Stroke unit of measurement (as set in Preferences)
    • I'd love to see conditional text that can be manually reordered. Right now, it's ordered by alphanumeric only.
    • Ditto on the Text Variables that get squished.
    • Ability to change missing fonts in hidden conditional text.
    • The Notes panel is really in need of improvement. I'd like to see XML incorporated into annotations so that the resulting PDFs can have various types of annotations, not just sticky notes (which currently requires a third party plugin). I write about that here: Document Geek: My Wish List for Notes in Adobe InDesign
    • Get rid of Hover Scrolling! Or give us the option to turn it off. It's been messing up my workflow since it was introduced in 2013.

    Some of these I've posted to the UserVoice site, but I am reposting them here because they are out-of-the-box workflow which would greatly improve my ability to work with InDesign. Improving PDF Comments/Notes is probably top of my list of desired features. I don't use any of Adobe's recent additions to this area (either in Acrobat or in InDesign). I came up with my own solutions that are more full-fledged and reliable.

    Community Expert
    July 16, 2019

    Reading through all the posts - most of the ACPs here want functionality for exisiting items to be updated and work better than when first introduced. They were introduced, then no further updates to how they work since being integrated.

    A lot of features fell behind when InDesign programmers were scurrying to the "interactive" market, flash, ePubs, etc. and the main functionality of the program hasn't been updated in years!

    We want InDesign back for what it was designed for! We want it better. We want features improved upon, year on year - not just once!

    jane-e
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 16, 2019

    https://forums.adobe.com/people/Eugene+Tyson  wrote

    most of the ACPs here want functionality for exisiting items to be updated and work better than when first introduced. ... We want InDesign back for what it was designed for!

    Exactly!

    jane-e
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 16, 2019

    Long documents features that work without plug-ins and scripts would be awesome beyond imagination!

    Footnotes

    Endnotes (including at the end of the book)

    Indexing (with Italics)

    Selecting all of the same style

    Moving to another style to make edits from within the Paragraph Styles panel (Drop down menu)

    Text variables that don’t jam up

    A selection of several H&Js to choose from that are better than the default. Talk to Nigel or Brad or anyone.

    Turn off greeking as the default. Leave the checkbox in case someone wants it. QuarkXPress did this in QXP 7.

    Charts and graphs (unless Illustrator gets them)

    No bugs? Some of these “bugs” have been here since the beginning. Fixing them would be the coolest thing you could do!

    ~ Jane

    Barb Binder
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    July 16, 2019

    Hi Aman:

    Also late to the game but I'd like:

    1. the ability to link the application of a master page to a paragraph style (i.e., opening page master to chapter style title).
    2. sidehead columns and paragraphs (to designate a subhead to sit the the left of the paragraph it modifies)
    3. option to put para numbers at the left or right of the paragraph they modify (equations are numbered on the right)
    4. more options for paragraph numbering—specifically the ability to add a tab character at the beginning or middle of the number string.
    5. variables that can break across lines and variables in a pod for quicker updating.

    ~Barb

    ~Barb at Rocky Mountain Training