Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
July 3, 2020
Answered

InDesign Share for review - Images are blurry

  • July 3, 2020
  • 23 replies
  • 10837 views

Hi, when I prepare an InDesign file using "Share for Review" feature, the images are exported out rather low resolution / blurry as seen here:https://assets.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:913908ef-996f-4b5f-b99d-f730a011bda9?view=published

These images are quite hi-res in the original document and look fine in InDesign, but they are overly compressed when viewed in the review pane. The original source images are in PNG format.

Correct answer Rishabh_Tiwari

Hi ,

 

Thank you for reaching out. We have received a similar request on the Adobe InDesign UserVoice, and as per the comments from our Engineering team, "Share for Review is to quickly share a design that is still a work-in-progress with the Reviewer(s) for quick feedback. Since the review opens in a browser for the reviewer, it has to load quickly even on slow networks, that’s why the image quality has been kept low deliberately so that the page loads quickly without long wait times. Using high-res views will slow down the loading of pages in the browser considerably, marring the experience". Having said that, I'll share your feedback with the team and you can do that too by posting a new request.

 

Thanks

Rishabh

23 replies

Participant
April 17, 2024

Hi
I am struggling with a SVG file that blurs in share for review. 

This is odd as its the only time this has happened and I have worked on various other documents with hi res images no problem. It looks really poor to send for approval. 

xspace
Participating Frequently
February 4, 2024

....same issue...I use PDF in the future...with that bad quality it´s not possilbe to get a o.k. from the client. Maybe Adobe will kill this feature like other softwares.

(Thank you Adobe for raising the subscription prices and killing another Software like XD...well done!) Before you do that you should check your AI if it works correctly...midjourney is much far better for less money.

Mike Witherell
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 20, 2023

"deliberately kept low"

How low? What ppi and compression level did the Adobe engineers elect to use?

Mike Witherell
Community Expert
December 20, 2023

Hi Mike,

it's not only low quality of images. There's more ( or if you prefer ) less to it:

Overprinting does not work at all.

 

For years now I suggest the equivalent of the following PDF settings for export with Share For Review:

 

 

Regards,
Uwe Laubender
( Adobe Community Expert )

Tyler Lukey
Participating Frequently
October 27, 2023

Are there any updates being made to this feature? I'd love to have at bare minimum a setting where I can control the dpi of the raster image outputs. Please.

Rishabh_Tiwari
Rishabh_TiwariCorrect answer
Legend
December 20, 2023

Hi ,

 

Thank you for reaching out. We have received a similar request on the Adobe InDesign UserVoice, and as per the comments from our Engineering team, "Share for Review is to quickly share a design that is still a work-in-progress with the Reviewer(s) for quick feedback. Since the review opens in a browser for the reviewer, it has to load quickly even on slow networks, that’s why the image quality has been kept low deliberately so that the page loads quickly without long wait times. Using high-res views will slow down the loading of pages in the browser considerably, marring the experience". Having said that, I'll share your feedback with the team and you can do that too by posting a new request.

 

Thanks

Rishabh

Participant
December 20, 2023

The issue is fast load times don't matter if what appears afterwards is unusable for review purposes (as many of us have said in this thread). 

Participating Frequently
October 23, 2023

Can we get an update on this? Every png/jpg image in links I share looks low res - and each time I have to tell the client "no, it's just Adobe's Share for Review feature, don't worry" - it reduces their confidence in the platform.

Participant
September 25, 2023

If you can do your artwork in Illustrator it produces a higher resolution image. Not ideal, but if it is only a one page doc, copy your InDesing file to Illustrator and then share it for review.

Community Expert
September 25, 2023

Hi @Craig29210919lf7q ,

interesting to see that "Share For Review" done with Adobe Illustrator will yield to better results.

Still, I have to test this with Illustrator. And also if overprinting elements are showing the overprinting effect for example.

 

Thanks,
Uwe Laubender
( Adobe Community Expert )

 

Participant
July 29, 2022

I'm having the exact same issue. 

It's too blurry and it makes no favour to all my hard work. I rather export as pdf and get my comments in another plataform. 

Participant
July 29, 2022

This issue has been around for 2 years with no solution. 

Tyler Lukey
Participating Frequently
February 17, 2023

Still waiting on this. 3 years now.

victoriak75216465
Participant
November 1, 2021

Did this ever get resolved? I have seen some Adobe employees saying standard practice as it's used to share work in progress and made to be quick so makes the resolution of images smaller, it's only for internal use etc...

 

But at my place of work we are using this to share designs with clients too, so they can comment their amends to us, pin to specific pages and avoids the client keeping files that aren't finalised and having the wrong one on file. It streamlines the process when designing websites in XD and sharing with the client, they get to see the site look as realistic as possible and makes feedback easier so would be great to see in the same quality on other Adobe products.

Participant
November 1, 2021

Even when you're only using them internally, internal stakeholders are going to see a very low-res image and say "hey that image is too low res." It's useless to use this as a solution for reviews when you have to say "oh ignore the pixelated images" and then do a separate review later as a PDF to get approval on the image quality.

cbesett
Inspiring
September 23, 2021

I was hoping there was something I was doing - but to find out this is just how it is supposed to be?  No.  I can't constantly explain why everything looks terrible.  No client will understand "that's just how it is" and sign off on something or even give feedback without constantly asking why things look bad.  Vectors look great -- it's just rasterized images.

rlndsznt
Participating Frequently
April 22, 2021

Haha, I just discovered this function, then immediately abandoned it after seeing how the compression totally botched up my document. Great idea, awful execution.