• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
35

P: Develop presets not sorting correctly

Explorer ,
Apr 03, 2018 Apr 03, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

TheyRackMultipart201804039331215qg-c8f7b329-4af5-42e3-ba14-bd44aef398bd-279039350.pngRackMultipart201804039331215qg-c8f7b329-4af5-42e3-ba14-bd44aef398bd-279039350.png used to be sorted alphabetically. In version 7.3 the order is random

Bug Fixed
TOPICS
macOS , Windows

Views

291

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Apr 05, 2018 Apr 05, 2018
We're investigating this issue. Thanks for reporting.

Votes

Translate

Translate
replies 123 Replies 123
123 Comments
Adobe Employee ,
Jun 19, 2018 Jun 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Grégory, 

This thread contains users who might benefit from the Manage window. That is additional information for users who rely on managing and organizing their presets. 
Rikk Flohr - Customer Advocacy: Adobe Photography Products

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Jun 19, 2018 Jun 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

No, it is still not possible to sort presets.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 19, 2018 Jun 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Please post a screenshot of what you're seeing.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 19, 2018 Jun 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Presets should sort alphabetically. You cannot choose another kind of sort yourself.
-- Johan W. Elzenga

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Jun 19, 2018 Jun 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Grégory, you have registered your complaint. Now, as a developer could you offer your clear advice on what you'd consider to an acceptable implementation that would meet your needs and expectations.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Jun 20, 2018 Jun 20, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Nothing more than a consistent folder system (we can consider preset groups are folders) so you can delete/rename/create folders independently from their content, and all actions accessible *at the same place* (right now new=create new preset to create parent group (!), rename=right click, hide=manage window, unhide=manage or right click).
Concerning sort, alphabetical order is fine as long as *all* groups are sorted even the default ones. If you can't do that, instead allow custom sort.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Jun 20, 2018 Jun 20, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

This should be very helpful to Adobe as they continue to evolve LR Classic CC going forward. They seem like reasonable and useful features.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 24, 2018 Jun 24, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I still have Presets scrambled all over the place.  I now have went back AGAIN to the version that works.  When is this getting fixed please!!!! (June 24th)

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 24, 2018 Jun 24, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I am sticking with 7.2 until this situation is resolved.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 25, 2018 Jun 25, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

> I still have Presets scrambled all over the place.

Can you give examples Christine? Screenshots would be ideal. They've fixed the obvious issues, but there clearly could still be some outlying situations they haven't caught yet.
______________________
The Lightroom Queen - Author of the Lightroom Missing FAQ & Edit Like a Pro books.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 25, 2018 Jun 25, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

New Develop presets I create with LR 7.4 are out of sort order. It looks like they are being placed near the bottom of the folder list. I just created two presets shown below inside the red outline. I used John Ellis' 'Fix Presets' plugin with 7.3, which fixed the preset sort order. It's my understanding with LR 7.4 this plugin shouldn't be needed.

19971jsg2nq_inline-becaad0d-80c0-42a4-8abc-daf3567f70af-172722870.jpg

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
Jun 25, 2018 Jun 25, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It's not clear to me if this issue is fixed or not. Many of the presets are not in alphabetical order but I'm not sure if they were designed to be so ordered. See the following post from about three months ago by Nathan Johnson:

"Nathan Johnson

  • 19 Posts
  •  
  •  18 Reply Likes
OK - I think I've solved this little mystery... it doesn't have anything to do with High Sierra (it's happening to me on El Capitan) BUT with the XMP presets conversion (and differences in convention between the .lrtemplate files and the .xmp files). 

Inside an .lrtemplate file, there are two name properties... "internalName" and "title"... when you initially create a preset file, they are both the same. But it is possible for the "title" to become different than the "internalName" (especially for preset developers who are editing .lrtemplate files directly). 

Example of .lrtemplate file:

RackMultipart20180404998481hqo-246d9c76-2a26-4708-9ae7-083ac5b41dac-25307344.png


So here, I must have changed the title directly in a text editor.

In any case, this didn't matter, because ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF LIGHTROOM only looked at the "title" property to determine how to sort presets.

Enter LR Classic 7.3 and the .xmp conversion...

XMP also has a number of properties related to the name of the preset. The "Name" property is the displayed name...

BUT... XMP has a "SortName" propertyAnd this property determines how Lightroom actually sorts the presets.

When LR 7.3 converted .lrtemplate files to .xmp files, it took the "internalName" and placed it in the "SortName" property... 

Example...

RackMultipart20180404542081mnc-993a57b0-8240-4e60-b1de-7952e8c3e3c0-1720890488.png

AND unlike all previous lightroom versions, the .xmp presets actually do get sorted by the sortName property... 

So now, inside Lightroom Classic, you see presets that are mostly sorted, but with seemingly random deviations from that sorting...

RackMultipart2018040426340t4wd-5a4093fb-0156-401e-8edb-d4e871bc83f7-1940074241.png

All that to say, I wish that Adobe hadn't assumed that we wanted the internalName to now be used a sorting device (which it never had been before). But I don't think it is cool that now we have the ability to do custom orders without changing the display name!

Now... I've got a lot of presets to update..."

Here is a sample of what I am seeing in LR CC 7.4 after updating.

RackMultipart2018062537683jdd5-3c467ba0-38fc-4807-afe4-761cb49ac68d-249992111.JPG

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Jun 25, 2018 Jun 25, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The Lightroom Classic CC team is aware that there are still some sorting issues and are working through it for the next release. We appreciate your patience. 
Rikk Flohr - Customer Advocacy: Adobe Photography Products

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 25, 2018 Jun 25, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

As a workaround while awaiting a fix, the free Fix Presets plugin will correct the sorting of your presets.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jun 25, 2018 Jun 25, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I hope Adobe just fixes what they broke in the name of "improvements". 
It is well past the time to stop introducing new "features & enhancements" and just fix the software.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 25, 2018 Jun 25, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks John. I downloaded the latest v1.6 Fix Presets plugin update, which corrected the above mentioned "new preset" sort order. This should work for others with similar preset sorting issues.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Nov 19, 2018 Nov 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Rikk, I'm still seeing this issue in LR 8.0 when creating new presets. They appear at the bottom of the list. When can we expect an update to correct this issue?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Nov 19, 2018 Nov 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Have you reviewed the steps here, Todd: https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/develop-presets-incorrect-sorting.html ?
Rikk Flohr - Customer Advocacy: Adobe Photography Products

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Nov 19, 2018 Nov 19, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I'm using John Eliis' Fix Presets plugin, which is quick, easy to use, and free. Renaming presets after creating them seems like a kludge. Status still shows as 'In Progress' so I assume this will be fixed correct?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 01, 2019 Jun 01, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I haven't been able to reproduce the sorting problems in LR 8.3.1, testing imported presets, creating new presetings, moving presets into groups, renaming presets, presets manipulated by Camera Raw, and presets with names containing numbers.

Previous versions of LR may have left your presets inconsistently sorted, and LR 8.3.1 won't fix that.  But you can fix it by running the Fix Ordering command of the free Fix Presets plugin.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 02, 2019 Jun 02, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks John I can confirm running the Fix Presets plugin corrects the sort order problem permanently...at least for now. Let's just hope Adobe doesn't break it again in a future update!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Nov 30, 2020 Nov 30, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

3 years and this problem is still here. LOL ADOBE!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Nov 30, 2020 Nov 30, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

This was fixed a couple of years ago  You may need to update Lightroom. 

Rikk Flohr - Customer Advocacy: Adobe Photography Products

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report