Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
26

P: Gen Remove now changes elements outside the painted mask

Explorer ,
Aug 13, 2025 Aug 13, 2025

The update to the Generative Remove AI model in Lightroom Classic 14.5 has ruined it, as it now changes elements outside the painted mask, making it more or less unusable in many situations.

Bug Fixed
TOPICS
macOS
22.9K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Pinned Replies

Adobe Employee , Aug 19, 2025 Aug 19, 2025

We are looking into this report and other similar reports. Thank you for the additional information. 

Status Investigating
Translate
Adobe Employee , Dec 15, 2025 Dec 15, 2025

Greetings all, 

 

A new update for the Adobe Photography products has been released.  The December release contains an update regarding this issue. 

If you do not see the update in your Creative Cloud Application, you can refresh it by pressing  [Ctrl/Cmd]+[Alt/Opt]+[ R ].

Note: It may take up to 24 hours for your update to be available in your Creative Cloud app.

 

Thank you for being so patient. 

Status Fixed
Translate
replies 138 Replies 138
138 Comments
Adobe Employee ,
Dec 15, 2025 Dec 15, 2025

@Thomas Steen Petersen  Thank you for sharing the screen shot. We had been testing with this specific example image, which was provided by you. We do get better results sometimes but it is likely due to the randomness associated with generative AI. 

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Dec 15, 2025 Dec 15, 2025

@krishna.singh @Rikk Flohr: Photography 
Before the Lightroom 14.5 update in August, the Remove Tool was very powerful, and you could always trust that only pixels inside the selected area were changed. I understand that AI has some inherent randomness, which is fine, since you can simply regenerate the result until you’re satisfied. What I don’t understand is why Adobe chose to let the Remove Tool modify pixels outside the selected area. It worked beautifully before this change. What is the purpose of this new behavior?

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

I must agree with @Thomas Steen Petersen, editing stuff outside the mask makes this pretty unusable for me.


I'm still getting results that, honestly, don't look great.

As mentioned by others, the behaviour prior to all this was much more controllable.

 

Can we go back to how this was before where edits are made completey inside the mask? 

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

Adobe was trying to make it easier to use. Inexperienced users were having trouble selecting everything necessary, such as shadows, so they tried to make it smarter, to automatically select shadows. The result was a huge disappointment. I've reverted to LC 14.4 until they fix this issue. Supposedly it is fixed as of yesterday, but I'll wait to hear if the problem is really resolved. I have thousands of images to edit and can't afford this sort of issue.

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

@Rikk Flohr: Photography

I’m very saddened that the status has been changed to fixed, because it is far from fixed. In my view, it is not fixed until you can trust that only the selected area is affected by the Remove Tool. As it is now, I’m left with the feeling that I no longer control the tool. It worked so well before.

I have a few questions:

  1. Does the fixed status mean that there is absolutely no chance that Adobe will reconsider this change and restore the Remove Tool to the well-functioning tool it once was?

  2. Is the change in behavior of the Remove Tool in version 14.5 and newer — as some have suggested — intended to help inexperienced users who may struggle to paint precise masks (for example around shadows), and if so, has this been done at the expense of professionals and enthusiastic, skilled hobbyists?

Translate
Report
New Here ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

It is not fixed!!! I can hardly see any difference vs 14.5

 

I'm still using version LrC 14.4, but you Adobe screwed all mobile users who can't downgrade. I can't use LR on iPad anymore! It's ridiculous!

Translate
Report
LEGEND ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]

 

I retried the sample photo posted by @Thomas Steen Petersen and got the same results as in LR 14.5 and LR 15.0:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-bugs/p-gen-remove-now-changes-elements-outside-the-...

 

I don't see any change -- Generative AI Remove is still coloring outside the lines. Here's the careful selection of the building behind the chimneys and roofs:

 

Screenshot-2025-12-16-at-11.01.38-AM.jpg

And here's the result, where the chimneys outside the selection have been significantly changed:

 

Screenshot-2025-12-16-at-11.02.08-AM.jpg

Translate
Report
LEGEND ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

@Jonathan_Seattle: "Adobe was trying to make it easier to use. Inexperienced users were having trouble selecting everything necessary, such as shadows, so they tried to make it smarter, to automatically select shadows."

 

That's always been my assumption too. I helped many dozens of users with the prior version:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-discussions/p-generative-remove-feedback-lr-classic...

 

and the most common complaint was that Remove would "replace" rather than "remove".  In nearly all these cases, though, selecting the shadows and reflections of the object to be removed would yield an excellent result.  Often the shadows or reflections weren't obvious, and infrequently, Remove would get fooled into mistakenly identifying a shadow or reflection.

 

For very simple removals, the current version does an adequate job and replaces the shadows and reflections even if they're not selected. But as many have observed, it often colors outside the lines, producing unacceptable results. 

 

It's seemed pretty clear to me that the LR product managers have explicitly chosen to make Remove easy for inexperienced and casual use, sacrificing the more complicated and sophisticated use cases. This may be an instance where the technology isn't able to serve both sets of use cases with a single feature.

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

@johnrellis 
I agree with you that the Remove Tool may not work optimally for both inexperienced and skilled users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution in this situation. That said, Lightroom is an application with a strong focus on professional users, and it should avoid prioritizing simplicity at the expense of precision and control. A possible feature request could be to introduce an expert mode for the Remove Tool, selectable either in Lightroom’s preferences or directly from the tool menu.

Translate
Report
LEGEND ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

@Thomas Steen Petersen, see here for how to post a feature request:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-ideas/p-how-do-i-write-a-feature-request/idi-p/1238...

 

If you submit a request, post its link here to encourage us to upvote it and add our own constructive feedback.

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

@johnrellis

Thanks for the link to the instructions on how to submit a feature request, and for the advice to post a link to that request in this thread.

I truly enjoy working with Lightroom, and it has been impressive to follow how the Lightroom has evolved into such a comprehensive and highly capable tool over the years. This is exactly why the recent change in the behavior of the Remove Tool stands out to me. For that reason, I have to make a feature request for an expert mode for the Remove Tool, as this would help maintain the level of precision and control that experienced users rely on.

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
Dec 16, 2025 Dec 16, 2025

Lightroom is PROFESSIONAL tools. It mean, if someone don't know how to use it properly, this person must learn how to master the tool - or switch to a consumer software.

 

But Adobe want keep everyone - as a result, trying to please lazy uneducated newbies, they broke the great powerful tool for everybody,  hit advanced users, and didn't fix the issue for practically half of year. And yet, they still announce ney toys targeting inexperienced users at first. Introduced new funny things at MAX over the unfixed broken tools.

 

I see lack of understanding from Adobe side. If they are playing this game to keep new users from switching to consumer spps, the EXISTING PROFESDIONALS will switch to another professional apps. Doesn't matter how many new funny tools Adobe will include, it doesn't matter if these tools are unreliable. If I can't use some tool, I can use other software without this tool, plain and simple 

Translate
Report
Explorer ,
14 hours ago 14 hours ago
LATEST

Easy fix to satisfy both user groups would be an Expert mode toggle.

Translate
Report