Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This thread is now closed. Please update to LrC 14.x or LrD 8.x. If you wish to provide feedback, please go to the new article.
The recommended order for applying edits is:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Agreed!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, agreed. Is there a way to indicate remove instead of replace?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@P21910559kll8: "Is there a way to indicate remove instead of replace?"
See this article for more details on how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'd say "Remove" really acts like replace probably 19 times out of 20. It's a laughable shadow of the Remove AI tool in PhotoShop.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@andrew1505: "I'd say "Remove" really acts like replace probably 19 times out of 20."
Remove works very well following the guidance in this article (summarized in the top post here):
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It removes the object, but I had to refresh the result at least 7 times to find the result where it actually removed the object. Ideally, this should be the first in the results. And most of the results appeared quite artificial.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Agree with the above, I tried to remove a rock from a portrait and it replaced it with someone's head. I don't understand the logic there.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Brutal!!!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Love how it removed spots, but yesterday the spot removal no longer is removing to bug in my images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I found that drawing, what seemed to be too much margin around the object to be removed, yielded a successful removal. And if it didn't work the first time, I clicked the "refresh" button.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Agree, its frustrating when you try to remove an object and instead Adobe places another image instead of removing and puting the background as requested. Especially when you can't tell it what you want it to do with a prompt.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@prgal: "you try to remove an object and instead Adobe places another image instead of removing and puting the background as requested"
See this article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Sometimes it works great, especially when removing objects, but sometimes it just offer cracy replacements instead of just considering the sourounding background. To remove cables or fences it works really pour, other programs can do that much better already.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Gerald36453231giy4: "sometimes it just offer crazy replacements instead of just considering the surrounding background."
See this article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Adobe as a software editing leader should figure out a way one can mask the entire fence with chain link or otherwise and seamlessly remove and replace the background. If it kept the same resolution in doing so it would be fantastic and a real game changer.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I thought that the tool was working better about month ago. I can't seem to delete anything and keep the surroundings. Too much is added in that does not belong, even without generative ai.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
See this article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
A Remoção Gerativa também permite que você escolha entre várias variações, porem nao permite ainda que voce diga o que deseja , fiz um teste e ele me trouxe muitas variações mas nenhuma delas estava a contento.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Great start! I love the addition of this tool to LRCC 13.3 - amazing that Adobe was able to slap this technology onto RAW files.
The first improvement that I see could be made is a feathering option for the selection. The transitions under light fall-off are still quite hard-edged and noticeable.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Better seams and outlines is something we are working on.
Barry
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is very good to hear.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Sweet!
Doesn't work to start by defining an area with Clone tool, switch the already applied retouching to Remove and then turn on the Generative AI checkbox. It presents the usual progress bar, but does not produce a generative result. (LRC on M3 Macbook Pro running Sonoma on HEIC panorama from an iphone)
Would love to see you allow us to use it to fill the empty/white areas at the edge of an image after appling Transform features such as upright, but it currently can only work within the original image area.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, started using Generative remove today. I had taken a series of images and found that the sensor on a camera, not often used had been fungussed!? It was a great day and was disappointed that all the images were wasted. However, I found that Generative Remove has cut the work down in this instance quite dramatically, and saved the day, but it still onerous. Luckily the areas affected are block colour but in the more detailed areas I found that I needed to use a much smaller cursor size, but it worked, after a fashion.
Adjustable Feathering the cursor might help. I also had a glitch (hockey-stick glitch) every so often (pictures attached) which I could not explain - just went to undo and waited a few seconds. In addition, would it be possible to save the actions of Generative Remove as a mask that could be used on the other imagesof the same batch? Thats all. Thanks
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Using Generative Remove for spot removal is not recomended as it is much slower than using the standard heal tool.
Please refer to the FAQ provided by Adobe for guidance on whcih of the Remove tools is bested suited to particular tasks.
https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-cc/using/generative-remove-faq.html