Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The recommended order for applying edits is:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@matt23382267brvi: "That's not the case for this one."
Please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I've just read another comment saying it could be related to crop, transform or lens corrections. This seems to be the case. I reset the image and tried the tool and it worked well... The problem with that is, sometimes you only want to remove something after other work has been done. There needs to be a work around for that.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]
@matt23382267brvi: "The problem with that is, sometimes you only want to remove something after other work has been done. There needs to be a work around for that."
Agreed. For many people including me, the most natural workflow is to apply crop, lens corrections, and transform first and then apply further edits.
A mildly inconvenient workaround is to press Alt / Opt and then toggle off Lens Corrections and Transform:
After applying Remove, toggle the corrections back on.
There is no such toggle for Crop, but you can do Settings > Copy Settings to copy the current crop, reset the crop, apply Remove, and then do Settings > Paste Settings to restore the crop.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
thanks for genretive Ai. Its work good at some time in lightroom but not work properlly compair to photoshop genretive ai beacuse here we can give any comment to genretive ai (what i need ) so plz provide promt section in lightroom. So we can work eassaly with ai
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
LR Feature requests — (sorry, I couldn't find a better place to post it)
1.Add a “Notes” section in Library module, right panel.
2.Number history items for easier reference
3.Add brush function to allow brushing luminance range. Now have to do everything and then subtract.
4.AI to fill in blown out overexposed information
5.Ability to name a mask prior to its use, not only after its use. Perhaps auto-name it, e.g. “Background” with instant option to rename it.
6.KB shortcuts for Subj, sky, background, Obj, Lum range & color range
7.Put redeye under people. This is rarely used by LR users.
8.HDR merge. Let “”Cancel” have the shortcut of Com-delete or Com-W.
9.Have Folder show number of images in subfolders. Now = 0
10.Have “constrain crop” turned on as the default in Transform
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Ken Woodrow Please read: https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-ideas/how-do-i-write-a-feature-request/idi-p/123863...
Most importantly - never combine feature requests in one post!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Why is it that it seems to be impossible to completely remove an object from the edge of an image? If it goes off the edge, I would think it would be easier... Can someone give me a tip as to how to get this to work?
Thanks!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@LongView: "Why is it that it seems to be impossible to completely remove an object from the edge of an image?"
The photo probably has Crop, Transform, or Lens Corrections applied, all of which crop the photo. Apply Remove first then those commands. See this article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks! I read all the related links and it's working much better now!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Teilweise überraschend gute Ergebnisse. Leider bringe ich es nicht zustande, ein kleines Stück unpassenden Hintergrund, zu entfernen und dafür den daran anschließenden Hintergrund einfügen zu lassen.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@ChristianFrank: "I can't remove a small piece of unsuitable background and have the background inserted in its place."
Please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Love the added feature, but it doesn't remove completely. There's always a faint outline left before at 100% opacity. Photoshop does a better job than lightroom.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Sara38921655kblf: "There's always a faint outline left before at 100% opacity."
Are you applying Remove on top of a Sky mask? If so, then do Settings > Update Ai Settings?
If not, then there have been some reports about replacements not matching the background color exactly. You can often work around that by making a much larger and/or raggedy selection around the object, e.g.
If these suggestions don't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
All AI functions are NOT remebered
My computer crashed
And after i can go further with the foto's i must restore all pictures with AI
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Gerard38305403cjab, see if the fix in this post helps:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The REMOVE tool is NOT a replacement tool
Please delete / remove selected
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Gerard38305403cjab: "Please delete / remove selected"
See this article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so we and Adobe can see the issue in detail. With nearly everyone who has posted a problem photo, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm guessing it's been mentioned already, but the blending between areas of subtle gradient variation is one of the tool's weaknesses. The occasionally successful workaround employs the use of the original healing brush which does a far more accurate job in blending tones.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@JBedfordPhoto: "blending between areas of subtle gradient variation is one of the tool's weaknesses."
There indeed have been a number of reports about replacements not matching the background color exactly. You can often work around that by making a much larger and/or raggedy selection around the object, e.g.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I assume its probably been mentioned, but it really doesnt work well with film stocks. in particular film grain. where ever you apply it's left smoth without grain. So theres a clear line from the effect to the image.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@tom38971491noxg: "it really doesnt work well with film stocks. in particular film grain."
There have been a number of reports about not matching sky and other uniform backgrounds but none here about grain. Please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo, so Adobe can see the issue in detail.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@tom38971491noxg, I'm not at all surprised about this. For reasons that are beyond my pay grade, a photograph of an slide, negative, or photo does not respond the same way as a scan of the same. For example, if you try to "Transform" an image in LRC that was photographed, it doesn't work right. If you scan that same image, it works just fine. While I've not tried it recently, using Manual Noise Reduction on a photographed photo, it just doesn't understand film grain. The scan works "better," but is still a challenge.
For speed purposes, you cannot beat photographing other media, but for quality, you need to scan.
I'll do some tests later today on using Generative Remove on some of the images I've photographed and some I've scanned and get back to you.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
OK, in a nutshell, it didn't make much of any difference when removing objects if the analog image is photographed or scanned. As far as the grain is concerned, IF when taking the photo of the analog image, you also introduced digital noise, that could be removed with either ACR's noise removal or Topaz (sorry, if you have another third party noise removal, that's the only two I have to test with. However, I think it's safe to say that the results would be similar.
Film grain, however, still remains a big issue for digital repair. Grain is best removed at the time of capture using scanning and using Silverfast, I was able to remove the vast majority of grain very successfully.
I found that Adobe's Denoise did little to nothing to remove any grain, but Topaz did an OK job unless it got very dense. But light grain was removed was removed by topaz. Again, Topaz is the only 3rd party noise removal software I have, so I cannot test them.
But again, I found no difference from removing objects following the Lightroom Queen's guidelines whether the image was digitally created, photographed, or scanned (plus a bit of luck).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Funktioniert garsde mal eben so was von überhaupt nicht. Entfernt die markierten Linien kein bisschen. Ganz großer Murks.