Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The recommended order for applying edits is:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Generative AI has been disgnated as 'Early Access'. As such, any credits used as part of your edits carry no cost.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I do like the feature - it seems way more accurate than the old healing (or PS spot healing tools) on many occasions.
However, the Metadata logging seems somewhat off, as I have a few photos marked from the LR filters (Library panel) as edited using AI technology, which I edited the last time way before AI was available in LR. Looking into those spots where I used the healing tool, these are clearly marked as not being healed by Generative Remove. Thus images might get flagged for (excessive) use of AI, which were never touched by AI in the first place.
Hope this can be adjusted in a future fix.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The Content-Aware Remove tool from LrC 12.x uses AI technology, albeit based solely on the pixels within the image. Therefore, any images edited using that tool will be flagged as having AI.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Wiebke37888945kwnw, "I have a few photos marked from the LR filters (Library panel) as edited using AI technology, which I edited the last time way before AI was available in LR."
There are two filter/smart criteria, Has AI Mask and Has AI Remove. Which one was given wrong results?
"Hope this can be adjusted in a future fix."
I tested these against a couple of my catalogs and didn't observe the bad results. Adobe won't pay any attention unless a very large number of people complain or a formal bug report is submitted from which Adobe can reproduce the problem:
https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-bugs/how-do-i-write-a-bug-report/idi-p/12386373
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @johnrellis,
Thanks for your reply 😊
I used the Has AI Remove Filter, however, considering @Ian Lyons' reply the old healing tool might be flagged as AI as well.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]
That tool was formerly called Content-Aware Remove and did indeed use AI technology, as Ian explained. You can still access it by clicking the same Remove icon and unchecking Generative AI and Object Aware:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I was referring to the Content-Aware Remal tool introduced in LrC 12 (October 2022 - https://helpx.adobe.com/uk/lightroom-classic/help/whats-new/2023.html), not the old heal tool. I've highlighted the Content-Aware Removal tool in the attached screenshot. It uses AI technology, but the model is restricted to using the pixels within the image.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]
LR used ambiguous terminology in 13.3 and earlier. The top bandaid button was called "Healing", and the Help calls it "Healing Mode":
The bottom bandaid button was called "Heal", and was one of three Heal Types according to the help or one of three Heal Modes according to the user interface:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I was having trouble with using the remove feature, but this morning I reset everything in the Remove portion of the menu. Then once again checked only the box for Generative AI and my results are stellar today. I even looked through all three of the ones generated and it was usually the first one that did the trick.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Good news that you resolved whatever the issue was causing bad results.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
when I try and remove an object instead of removing it a different version of it is presented
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Have a look at below linked tutorial. It demonstrates how to use the tool to remove rather than replace.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think this function would dramastically benefit, if it would include an option to choose whether I want to erase an object, or replace it. Other than that, It is sufficiently satisfying with its results.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
But it's always replacing!! The question is with what.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Have a look at below linked tutorial. It demonstrates how to use the tool to remove rather than replace.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Ian, I understand. However, isn't the tool ALWAYS replacing something? If you do the selection on a person correctly, it will not replace it with another person....however, it will replace it with a newly created background. The key is, I thing, understanding how the AI tool was trained to determine which path to take.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, technically, the tool is always replacing the selected area with generated imagery. But in common usage by non-engineers, it's intuitive to use the term "remove" to mean replacing a visually distinct object by background or imagery that we don't perceive as a foreground object, and to use the term "replace" to mean substituting a new generated object for the selected object.
With this understanding of the terms, the help article gives useful advice about how to use the tool to remove instead of replace.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I agree to the 'KISS' principle. However, even for "non-engineers", I would think it helpful to understand that the process is the same...and the masking process, as show so well in the article, is set to instruct the AI process in what to replace it with.....but maybe I'm being to logical and not 'artistic' enough 😀
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
When removing objects against a clear sky, the sky is darkened around where the objects was
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@PhotoInge: "When removing objects against a clear sky, the sky is darkened around where the objects was"
That can happen if you apply any of the Remove tools on top of an existing mask. In Develop, do Settings > Update AI Settings. In general, do Remove first, then create the mask.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
Love the feature, but...
Remove should be more of a ''remove'' thing than a ''replace'' thing.
The selection of remove areas isn't intuitive.
The results are very volatile (sometimes very good, sometimes pretty bad).
The general application of the generative removal tool should be more like in Photoshop, where you have more control over the affected areas.
Kind regards,
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
See this article for how to use the tool more reliably to remove rather than replace:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello, I'm new to using PS and LRC. I'd done some tests with the AI element suppression in PS and I'm delighted to see the function arrive in LRC. I generated a first time the choice N°2 was good but not perfect, I then updated and the 3 new proposals were not good, when I wanted to return to the proposal N°2 of the first generation that was not possible whereas one can baculate in PS. Did I make a mistake? If not, it would be nice to be able to go back to the previous generated version.
Thank you Corinne
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Lapuce69: "it would be nice to be able to go back to the previous generated version."
The command Edit > Undo will back up to the previous version. See the attached screen recording for an example.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Really an amazing addition! I find myself using it al the time and I'n pleasantly surprized by it's accuracy. Bravo!