P: Generated images violate user guidelines

@bradleyalphabet That's a great analogy; remove the training wheels - beating a dead horse at this point, but it's an unacceptable level of restriction / censorship (I hate using that word in this context but I think the concept is applicable).  Many of us shoot primarily portraits, most is totally unremarkable, some of which is boudoir, and some may even be spicier - it's nothing new, so it's silly to think that this should be a problem only now.

@lagedor222 You're right, there's zero reason Generative AI should be flagging that, however the Content-Aware Heal tool, or new beta Remove Tool (which works fantastic, btw, barring the occasional (internet / server?) delay) would be better for.

Also, do we know if the Generative AI will be outputting in higher resolution once it's out of beta?  I read on a 3rd party website that it's limited to 1024px maximum resolution currently, which obviously is tiny by today's standards.  While that works fine for many use-cases, that doesn't work for many others.  I've of course tried to keep working areas smaller with this in mind, but the average user when it comes out of beta will not be aware of, or understand, this limitation.  Another important limitation to keep in mind is this resolution limitation also prevents the Generative AI tool from properly matching many input's grain.  I'm shooting on an R5, which is 45MP SOOC, or 180MP if you've used Super Resolution (which is what I do for headshots).  At that resolution, Generative AI won't keep up with the natural grain of the camera even at 45MP for even just a medium sized area.  I've gotten around that limitation by faking it by matching the grain by applying a Camera RAW filter with matching grain (Amount: 25, Size: 15, for the average R5 file) onto the Generative AI's Smart Layer, and that does the trick most of the time, but it's another issue that needs to be looked at by Adobe before this is rolled out for primetime, becuase that's definitely a limitation, and it's something that nobody but powerusers like most of us here in this thread will be knowlegeable enough to work with.

I think the prudish community guidelines have a 'thing' about legs! I wanted to recreate something I saw while swimming so I used a photo of the pool underwater, and asked the prompt to fill it with "plump pale legs underwater." Nothing salacious about my concept. It's something I see everyday and find very beautiful (I'm female by the way) but no, "Guideline violation" 

I wanted to add a beachbar to the photo of a beach and sea, and used only the prompt "beachbar". However I get a message that the beachbar was not generated because it violated the guidelines. This is really odd! On what base does it violate the guidelines? Can you clarify this?

Maybe seen as niple? Refused to fill over and over again.
Also filling the space between cabinet doors is refused because "against the rules". Gereative fill doesn't work with most of the pictures I shoot in an office because of this reason. 

When it works it works

I had exactly the same with a flower, trying to remove highlights:

I will try it 

I would hope that testers will get a BIG discount off their next subscription as a thank you, like most other companies do

Donkeet,

You said, "Well you're not paying a premium for this because it is still in beta..."

Oh yea? I have great alternate graphics software but signed up just for their "super" (lol) Firefly and gen fill beta. Like other AI image beta generators they should work.

So every dime I spend, is a premium. And I will pay a huge penalty to cancel and rebuy when it is fixed.