Skip to main content
Inspiring
January 27, 2021
Question

Problem with PS file vs. any other file format

  • January 27, 2021
  • 2 replies
  • 1268 views

Hello,

 

I am having a terrible time working with a dark-colored photo. The photo looks great when Photoshop, but when printing or saving it as ANY non-PS form, the lighter colors look significantly more saturated and the darker colors look quite a bit darker and muddy. 

 

My current workflow is a NEC color-critical monitor as well as an Epson 3880 printer. 

 

The lighter photo was taken using my phone and the darker one was a jpeg-formed copy of the the native PS file. The one taken with my phone (lighter one) is much more accurate to my PS version.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated.

 

Sand Patch

 

 

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

davescm
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 31, 2021

I've posted this before but have a read through it, it may help your understanding :

 

Colour Management simple explanation

Digital images are made up of numbers. In RGB mode, each pixel has a number representing Red, a number representing Green and a Number representing Blue. The problem comes in that different devices can be sent those same numbers but will show different colours. To see a demonstration of this, walk into your local T.V. shop and look at the different coloured pictures – all from the same material.

To ensure the output device is showing the correct colours then a colour management system needs to know two things.

1. What colours do the numbers in the document represent? 
This is the job of the document profile which describes the exact colour to be shown when Red=255 and what colour of white is meant when Red=255, Green = 255 and Blue =255. It also describes how the intermediate values move from 0 through to 255 – known as the tone response curve (or sometimes “gamma”).
Examples of colour spaces are (Adobe RGB1998, sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
With the information from the document profile, the colour management system knows what colour is actually represented by the pixel values in the document.

  1. What colour will be displayed on the printer/monitor if it is sent certain pixel values?
    This is the job of the monitor/printer & paper profile. It should describe exactly what colours the device is capable of showing and, how the device will respond when sent certain values.
    So with a monitor profile that is built to represent the specific monitor (or a printer profile built to represent the specific printer, ink and paper combination) then the colour management system can predict exactly what colours will be shown if it sends specific pixel values to that device.

    So armed with those two profiles, the colour management system will convert the numbers in the document to the numbers that must be sent to the device in order that the correct colours are displayed.

So what can go wrong :

  1. The colours look different in Photoshop, which is colour managed, to the colours in a different application which is not colour managed.
    This is not actually fault, but it is a commonly raised issue. It is the colour managed version which is correct – the none colour managed application is just sending the document RGB numbers to the output device regardless without any conversion regardless of what they represent in the document and the way they will be displayed on the output device.

  2. The colour settings are changed in Photoshop without understanding what they are for.
    This results in the wrong profiles being used and therefore the wrong conversions and the wrong colours.
    If Photoshop is set to Preserve embedded profiles – it will use the colour profile within the document.

  3. The profile for the output device is incorrect.
    The profile should represent the behaviour of the device exactly. If the wrong profile is used it will not. Equally if the settings on the device are changed in comparison to those settings when the profile was made, then the profile can no longer describe the behaviour of the device. Two examples would be using a printer profile designed for one paper, with a different paper. A second example would be using a monitor profile but changing the colour/contrast etc settings on the monitor.
    The monitor profile is set in the operating system (in Windows 10 that is under Settings>System>Display >Advanced) which leads to a potential further issue. Operating system updates can sometimes load a different monitor profile, or a broken profile, which no longer represents the actual monitor.

 

 

Colour management is simple to use provided the document profile is correct, always save or export with an embedded profile, and the monitor/printer profile is correct. All the math is done in the background.

 

I hope that helps

Dave

Inspiring
January 31, 2021

I thank all of you for taking the effort in helping me with my monitor/printer issue. This is hugely informative to me. Please bare with me and my total illiteracy on the aspects of color management.

 

Okay, let me start trying to get myself out of this mess.

 

First, let me start of on C.pfaffenbichler's recommendation. When I made the Status Bar Document Profile, it changed the text to say, "Untagged RGB (8bpc).

 

Then I changed the Working Space to Adobe1998, however after I had closed the Color Setting window and opened it up again the RGB had defaulted to sRGB IEC61966-2.1. Is that to be expected? 

 

Also, will I end-up needing to go into my SpectraViewII software for any reason?

 

Sand Patch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inspiring
February 1, 2021

"I changed the Working Space to Adobe1998, however after I had closed the Color Setting window and opened it up again the RGB had defaulted to sRGB IEC61966-2.1."

 

Did you click OK or just close the dialogue window?

 

If your file is untagged then you will need to assign a profile. Which profile to assign is anyone's guess - try sRGB and if that looks wrong try Adobe RGB

In color settings I like to check "Missing Profiles Ask When Opening" as that way I get a warning on opening an image with no embedded profile and have to choose a profile for it there and then.

 

If you suspect your monitor profile is broken then you would use Spectraview to make a new one, but at this stage there is nothing to indicate that. I do though recalibrate and make new profiles for my monitors every 200 hours of use.

 

Dave

 

 


To answer your first question, I always click "OK," unless otherwise. To assign a profile, should I navigate to Edit > Assign Profile or Convert to Profile? If neither, where should I go? In the Assign Profile window, the setting has been set to "Don't Color Manage this Document". Obviously, that is consistant with what my Status Bar has been telling me. If that is indeed the correct window, should I revise it to the Working RGB: sRGB... setting, which does not have any other choices nor does it seem to change the appearance of the image in anyway. Or, should I check the "Profile" setting, with the dropdown menu sat at the sRGB... setting? The Profile one include a wide array of Epson profiles.

 

To give you an idea of idea of how I use my color-critical monitor I primarily use it for Illustrator vector files and use it for photography as a second resort. I got it about six years ago, and overall have been incredibly happy with it, when it comes to viewing images on display vs. the printouts, using my Epson 3880 printer. In terms of calibrating, I try to do that every two weeks. I have read that it is very common that people recycle their color-critical monitors every 2-3 years, but I have never found any need to do so myself. Once I asked an expert photographer, who has had two of them for as long as I have had mine, and what his take was on the scenario. His response was that he still thrilled with his original monitors. So I'm not quite sure about what to think of the idea of the need to replace them so often.

 

I brought this issue to you because of the unusual with my trying to print such a dark print, not having been as high quality as my other prints (taking into account that they had been quite a bit light in tone overall). Also, I have read that the Epson 3880 has a tendency of making prints noticably darker prints by other artists, despite the fact that it is a nine-color printer with four shades of black ink is contains.

 

Sand Patch

c.pfaffenbichler
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 27, 2021

For starters you saved the jpg without embedding the Profile. 

What was its original Color Space? sRGB or something else? 

 

Please set the Status Bar to »Document Profile« and post screenshots of the layered image and the jpg open in Photoshop. 

Inspiring
January 27, 2021

Thank you for responding.

 

First, I'm a little bit confused on how you say I save the jpeg file without embedding the profile. Are you referring to the screenshots, or my actual file?

 

Second, I seemed to be using the Adobe RGB 1998 setting.

 

And third, here is a screenshot of the current color settings. It looks like the RGB was set to the color critical monitor I'm using.

c.pfaffenbichler
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 31, 2021

And again: 

Please set the Status Bar to »Document Profile« and post screenshots of the layered image and the jpg open in Photoshop. 

 

»It looks like the RGB was set to the color critical monitor I'm using«

Why would you set the Working Space to the monitor profile?

That’s nonsense as it makes a mockery of Color Management. Though as you set Photoshop to preserve embedded profiles it would not be an immediate problem if the image has the correct profile embedded.  

(edited)