• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
3

Could add a feature to Photoshop for "document versions"?

Community Beginner ,
Dec 23, 2024 Dec 23, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think it is good to see "revisions" or " document versions" feauture in Photosop. There is a "new document" feauture avaible but this is not working in the same document.

Idea No status
TOPICS
macOS , Windows

Views

81

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
6 Comments
Community Expert ,
Dec 23, 2024 Dec 23, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@ardak89157071 – I've added my vote on your idea/feature request for this as a native feature.


It would help the developers to understand exactly what you want... Is this simply adding a numbered suffix to the filename, such as 0001, 0002 etc? Or would this be a date/time stamp? Or the option for either, or something else?

 

Would this save a copy leaving the original doc open with the original name, or would it save as replacing the open file? Or an option for both?

 

You mentioned working in the same document but not what/how this versioning would work (i.e. a database). Are you looking for a single visible file with accessible versions, rather than multiple files with different names?

 

Until such a feature is possibly introduced, there are various custom scripts available to do this as separate files.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 23, 2024 Dec 23, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I also support this idea, and for clarity with the developers, it should be available as an option for incremental saving of local documents. Cloud documents (PDSC) are already versioned, but are not practical for large documents on slow internet connections or where NDA requirements dictate local saving.
A suffix on the filename such as v001, v002 ....etc would work for me.

Dave

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 23, 2024 Dec 23, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@davescm 

 

So for you, simply having separate named files is enough? You are not wanting the same version experience as offered by PSDC on a "single" local file?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 23, 2024 Dec 23, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@Stephen Marsh No, multiple files is better for me. Less chance of corruption and, if a file was corrupted, there is a simple way step back to an older version. In short, for me, it would be good to be able to have the option to use an automated way of doing what I do now with Save As.

 

Dave

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 23, 2024 Dec 23, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think that most forms of versioning "single" image files would use separate files and abstract or hide this from the end user so that they only see one file, unless rolling back to a previous version, where they would then select one of multiple versions. I am not well versed in the mechanics of this, so I'm just guessing.

 

Have you looked at the various scripts for doing this as separate incrementally named files? You mentioned Save As, so you want the current open file to become the new increment (not saving a backup copy in the background).

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 24, 2024 Dec 24, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hi Stephen,

I've not looked at scripts as I am OK doing it manually at present. However, when I saw the idea put forward, it is one I support.

 

Dave

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report