Skip to main content
Known Participant
February 25, 2019
Question

How to color-manage Display P3 image file

  • February 25, 2019
  • 6 replies
  • 27600 views

When I try to open in Photoshop photos I made with my Iphone 8 Plus, I get the following message.  Which option should I choose?

"The document (document title here) has an embedded color profile that does not match the current RGB working space.

"Embedded: Display P3

Working:  sRGB IEC61966-2.1

What would you like to do?

Use the embedded profile (instead of the working space)?

Convert the document’s colors….?

Discard the embedded profile?"

Thanks.

This topic has been closed for replies.

6 replies

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 6, 2019

Tony, the conclusion above was to not convert (both from Stephen and myself). With that kind of steady volume, it makes no sense. Just keep your files with the embedded P3 profile - don't convert to Adobe RGB.

It's very important, however, that you instantly know the color space of any file you're working on. Having it displayed in the bottom left corner is the best way to do that.

This has a bearing on further processing, and a P3 file needs different treatment from an sRGB file. There is no problem working in P3, but you should never send out a file as P3, or post online or otherwise publish. Then you should convert to sRGB or Adobe RGB as required. One or more output actions could take care of that.

DCI-P3 does not yet qualify as a standard color space. It may in the future, but not yet. Treat it accordingly.

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Tony+Whitehall  wrote

I want to continue to use my Iphone 8 Plus (which I bought in December for almost $1,000) because I found out that it's camera monitor has brighter colors than any of my other cameras, so I can get better photos with my iPhone than with any of my other cameras.

The camera monitor has no effect on the quality of the file. It may instantly look better when you check the screen, but image quality depends only on the sensor and the optics used. A phone has a tiny plastic lens, and a tiny sensor. I've yet to see a phone image even in the same league as a decent system camera. They usually work well for the intended purpose, but often fall apart with any further processing.

Participant
November 5, 2019

Tony has a capture device that supports P3 and an editing system/monitor that supports P3. I don't see a reason for him to consider Adobe RGB for any part of this process. If I were Tony, I would keep all image masters in RGB P3 and edit in RGB P3. If the resulting image will be output to a printer, I would use Photoshop's View > Proof Setup to simulate the printer profile in CMYK while editing in RGB P3. If the result is going to the web only, then I would View > Proof Setup > sRGB. Note that you can change these virtual proof settings at any time without altering the file, and you'll be able to see how your image changes for the output formats. When he's done editing, he can make a appropriate conversion for a copy that goes to print or web (e.g., to CMYK with printer profile for print / RGB with sRGB profile for web).

davescm
Community Expert
Community Expert
November 5, 2019

You've replied to an old thread. There is one statement in your response where I would disagree, that is a step to convert to CMYK for print. He is printing directly on an Epson Inkjet and the driver will expect RGB. So yes, the correct printer profile for his paper, ink and print combination is essential but the conversion into the ink set - which is wider than CMYK will happen in the print driver. No need, in fact it would be disadvantageous, to convert the document to a CMYK profile first.

 

Dave

Known Participant
March 6, 2019

Thanks, Stephen.

Again, causing me more confusion and frustration, I'm not longer able to reply directly to your message; the message in the drop-down menu says, "No actions are available", so I manually copied and pasted your message below for continuity, and converted it to bold, italic text to differentiate your message from mine.

Your advice regarding scripting is out of my scope of ken. I'm not a code technician. I can barely figure out HTML, so I don't understand how to script as you suggest and I don't even know what program you used to demonstrate your example solution.  (I assume that you used Terminal or Photoshop.)

I want to continue to use my Iphone 8 Plus (which I bought in December for almost $1,000) because I found out that it's camera monitor has brighter colors than any of my other cameras, so I can get better photos with my iPhone than with any of my other cameras. 

I'll use your advice in the screen snapshot below to "Covert the document's colors to the working space."

Tony

"Tony, these are all standard issues and concerns for any camera that does not automatically save into a desired colour space. Things have changed, you just need to decide how you are going to manage the change.

"If you are happy with an sRGB workflow, continue to use it.

"You should not need to convert from Display P3 to Adobe RGB.

"You will need to convert to sRGB for web display and or printing as you always have. The question is do you convert on input into your workflow or only on output?

"The clipping issue has always been there, just not as in your face. Most sRGB profiles will not offer a perceptual conversion table, so the clipping is going to happen anyway, whether on input or output. You could try one of the “special" v4 perceptual sRGB profiles that does offer a perceptual conversion profile, if you think that the gamut compression is preferable to gamut clipping. There are other less obvious approaches too, but at the end of the day if you are aiming for the lowest common denominator of sRGB then you can’t be too picky. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a colour space snob nor an sRGB hater.

"You can set your colour settings to warn or not on profile mismatches, and default to your standard preference when opening:

"Or you may do similar with conditional actions and the script events manager, which should be redundant if you setup your colour settings how you wish:

"You could record an action to simply convert and run it in batch or save it as a droplet, then bulk process your images with a conversion into sRGB and leave them open or re-save as a PSD working file etc.

""There are scripting routes that you could use. There are Mac OS level solutions… Perhaps there are too many solutions!

"Again you just need to formulate a plan, test it and run with it. You may be able to find a 3rd party camera app that offers more control, or perhaps even ditch the newer iPhone and use an earlier model with sRGB or even use a camera that gives you sRGB or more control."

Known Participant
March 7, 2019

Thanks, D.

You wrote, "There is no problem working in P3, but you should never send out a file as P3, or post online or otherwise publish. Then you should convert to sRGB or Adobe RGB as required. One or more output actions could take care of that."

What would be the point of editing files with their broad gamut P3 profiles but then having the gamut clipped if must I convert it to sRGB for printing? 

Tony

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 7, 2019

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Tony+Whitehall  wrote

What would be the point of editing files with their broad gamut P3 profiles but then having the gamut clipped if must I convert it to sRGB for printing?

Who said sRGB for print? We said sRGB for web. Adobe RGB is fine for print (unless you send to a consumer-oriented print service that doesn't have a properly color managed process).

Known Participant
March 6, 2019

Thanks, D.

For some unknown reason (causing me more frustration), I'm not able to reply directly to your last advice, so I manually copied and pasted your advice below, for continuity.

What if I maintain the P3 profile so that the wider gamut applies when I print my prints on my Epson 9890 printer?

I do have a wide-gamut monitor – a 2015 Imac.  I can see the difference when I convert a P3 TIFF to an sRGB TIFF; there's a significant subduing of the magenta.

Tony

"OK, then keep them with the P3 profile.

"But as Stephen points out, gamut clipping is a fact of life, especially when the target is sRGB. It doesn't really matter much whether the source is Adobe RGB or P3 - the effect is pretty much the same.

"What you absolutely need to do, is keep track of your profiles at all times. Just know what you're working with. The only efficient way to do that is to set the notification area (I have no idea why this isn't set up by default - it's by far the most useful of the listed options):

P3 should never leave your system.

"The warning dialogs are just in the way and mostly irrelevant. I disable them. So what if it doesn't match the working space, that's not even remotely important. The only one you could keep is missing profile - that too will turn up in the info area, but the dialog also gives you the option to immediately assign the correct profile.

"Do you have a wide gamut monitor? If you don't, none of what we're discussing here will be visible on screen. Everything you see is already clipped to sRGB. If you want to check the clipping, look at the histogram."

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 2, 2019

OK, then keep them with the P3 profile.

But as Stephen points out, gamut clipping is a fact of life, especially when the target is sRGB. It doesn't really matter much whether the source is Adobe RGB or P3 - the effect is pretty much the same.

What you absolutely need to do, is keep track of your profiles at all times. Just know what you're working with. The only efficient way to do that is to set the notification area (I have no idea why this isn't set up by default - it's by far the most useful of the listed options):

P3 should never leave your system.

The warning dialogs are just in the way and mostly irrelevant. I disable them. So what if it doesn't match the working space, that's not even remotely important. The only one you could keep is missing profile - that too will turn up in the info area, but the dialog also gives you the option to immediately assign the correct profile.

Do you have a wide gamut monitor? If you don't, none of what we're discussing here will be visible on screen. Everything you see is already clipped to sRGB. If you want to check the clipping, look at the histogram.

Known Participant
February 25, 2019

Thanks, Stephen.

Yes, I edit my images and then publish them on the Internet.

But normally I start with sRGB IEC6... files and publish them with that embedded profile on the Internet.

This new "Display P3" profile that's embedded in all of my Iphone photos is a new problem that began when I began using images from my Iphone instead of my cameras, and I don't know how to deal with it.

Tony

Stephen Marsh
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 25, 2019

Converting to sRGB may be the “best” option for you, I don’t know the gamut of the “Display P3” profile, nor if it is “well behaved” for editing in. You could of course convert to Adobe RGB for edits and then publish in sRGB, however this may only introduce more steps without any added visible real world benefit.

Can you provide a link to sample files on the web that have this profile, or upload a sample or two to the forum?

Known Participant
February 25, 2019

Thanks, Stephen.

I think I'll convert to sRGB IEC6.... as you suggest.

I read of the Internet that Display P3 has a wider gamut than sRGB IEC6..., but I read the same thing years ago about Adobe RGB 1998, and I had a lot of problems with Adobe RGB 1998 color profile, so I abandoned it and for years have exclusively used sRGB IEC61966-2.1 for my computer monitor, giclee printers and Internet and that's worked fine.

I'm not sure what good it would do to upload an example of a Display P3 image; from what I read on the Web, it simply has a wider Gamut than sRGB (similar to the gamut of Adobe RGB), and that it's used by Apple in its camera phones and I think Microsoft recently also.

Tony

Stephen Marsh
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 25, 2019

Use the embedded profile (instead of the working space)?

Will you be making edits in this profile space?

Convert the document’s colors….?

A “safe” option, particularly so if your working RGB space is wider gamut than the embedded image’s RGB space.

Discard the embedded profile?

Rarely a good idea for RGB profiles?