Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Seems like buying Compressor for $50 and getting access to the ProRes 444 codec makes a lot more sense than transcoding my footage using Adobe Media Encoder and wasting 25% of my drive space using ProRes 4444, since my footage doesn't have an alpha channel, and those files are HUGE!
Is anybody doing this, and have any caveats, upsides, downsides, or success stories they can share?
Mac only, obviously.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Switch to DNx in the MXF wrapper.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Good idea.
I don't see an export option for DNxHR in MXF OP1a Format in Premiere (although I do see lots of other codecs).
I do see a DNxHR codec using Quicktime Format.
Do you happen to have a link or tip for doing this in Pr, AME, or Ae?
Is there a good reason to use MXF instead of QT?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In your first post you mentioned ProRes 444. I'm not sure I've ever heard of that flavor of ProRes. It's not listed in the Apple List of ProRes codecs:
About Apple ProRes - Apple Support
and does not appear as an option in Compressor running on my machine:
MtD
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You're using version 12.1.2?
MXF is a wrapper, plain and simple. QuickTime is a Multimedia Framework. It needs to be installed, needs updating, has bugs. It's not good. MXF just...works.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now