Great, thanks. Finally, since most all of my footage is shot at 50 fps and only one clip at 59.94, should I still use 59.94 as the highest rate as you suggested before, or drop to 50?
Great, thanks. Finally, since most all of my footage is shot at 50 fps and only one clip at 59.94, should I still use 59.94 as the highest rate as you suggested before, or drop to 50?
By @Lane23499113pawo
I wrote about that earlier:
"It do also depends on how much of each footage there is. It may not be worth it if you have let´s say ten seconds of 59.94 footage and two hours of 50 fps footage. If that´s the case i would choose a 50 fps timeline to edit in."
So since that seems to be the case for you a 50 fps timeline may be worth it, but i write "may" since the 29.97 fps footage will cause issues since 50 is cannot be even divided to 29.97 while 59.94 can. It all depends of how much time of each footage there is. Trial and error til you find the best solution. Mixing frame rates boils down to compromises. "If i do X, this happens but if i do Y that happens but i cannot do both..."
This is why i always aim to use the highest framerate of the footage since i dislike dropped frames and stuttery footage. (trial end error once again...)
If you use a 50 fps timeline, export to 25 fps for your TV but expect seeing dropped frames in the 29.97 footage.