Skip to main content
Inspiring
February 7, 2018
Question

Colour grade not exporting with Premiere Pro

  • February 7, 2018
  • 15 replies
  • 15049 views

Hi all, I may be doing something rather basic but here goes:

I am trying to export ANY file type from Premiere Pro CC - H264, ProRes, even still Jpeg images all have the same problem - some, not all (I cannot tell which) of the colour grades are not exporting so the Mp4 or .mov or whatever comes out is washed out - but not completely back to Slog.

It doesn't matter what the footage is - I tried reimporting MP4s and ProRes files and re-exporting them, I tried faking the grade but that just made a mess.

Any ideas? Doesn't make any difference if it's with LUTs or without - same issue

Machine is iMac Pro, Graphics card is Radeon Pro Vega 64 16GB, IOS is High Sierra, Adobe CC is up to date (brand new install)

Many thanks

Alex

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    15 replies

    Participant
    May 27, 2018

    Hey man,

    I had the same problem. Im using a a PC and noticed that most of my color grading did not export. I used windows media player to play my exported video and that is why it looked washed out. I played the same exported video using the windows default app "Film & TV" and VLC and all the color grading was there. So in my case, it was windows media player that made it look washed out. Hope this helps you.

    Cheers,

    jsyboy75Author
    Inspiring
    February 19, 2018

    Hi all,

    ​Thank you to all who have commented on this issue, I am disappointed to have discovered it, not least since the investment of an iMac Pro has highlighted it.

    The current solution is to use my old iMac as a target monitor and use that to check colours on (which is crazy, I know) but since Adobe Premiere Pro DOES NOT allow you to change the colour space of it's own Program Monitor window the only other way is to grade footage and then throw another adjustment layer on top so it looks correct on export.

    ​I am told that Adobe are working on a solution to this issue (just allow us to change the colour space of the Program monitor - problem solved) but this will happen faster if YOU get involved and request the feature.

    ​You can do this here:

    Creative Cloud Wishform (not product specific)

    ​Once again, thanks for all your input.

    ​Alex

    R Neil Haugen
    Legend
    February 19, 2018

    As noted elsewhere, I've been putting in the feature request for color management options every release for five years now.

    For operating in the real world we live in ... to get work out the door ... it's wise to set your monitors that will have program content on them to Rec709, and then calibrate them in that profile. Yea, even the colorists I know who've got some bloody expensive monitors with capabilities for nearly every space out there, say ... unless you're delivering P3 or (or whatever that space is) and such for festivals, or delivering full 1,000 NITS HDR, work in the space you deliver in.

    Which is sRGB/Rec 709.

    It just all works that way.

    And ... hopefully, we'll have other options soon.

    Neil

    Everyone's mileage always varies ...
    jsyboy75Author
    Inspiring
    February 19, 2018

    Yes but you can’t change the colour space on Adobe - that’s my point. You can change the monitor colour and actually watch Adobe snap back to whatever it thinks is correct. I should be able to set the colour space, how does adobe know what I’m editing for?

    Participating Frequently
    February 12, 2018

    I should add that allowing the PPPro program monitor to map correctly to the i-mac's wide gamut space would not have anything to do with the export being targeted for Rec 709. Those two things are independent of each other. The Rec 709 space is appropriate since it is the standard for broadcast and also because video is not currently able to embed and use color profiles. This is just like the early days of photo images on computers when there was only one RGB standard and it was assumed to be the profile for all devices...I think that was where standard RGB, or sRGB came from originally...

    Participating Frequently
    February 12, 2018

    OK, this took me a while, but I have figured this out. The reason you weren't seeing the problem with your 2011 I-mac or your 2014 MacBook Pro is because those screens are not as wide gamut as your new i-mac pro. Here is the problem, since PP Pro doesn't allow you to make the program monitor adjust for your wide gamut screen, what happens is that the Rec 709 space, being a relatively narrow color space, (like sRGB), is inappropriately mapped to the wide gamut screen. As you can see in Photoshop, if you have an sRGB image file but you ASSIGN a wide gamut profile, such as Adobe RGB, you will see that the image becomes very saturated. This is essentially what is happening in PP Pro on your new i-mac. If you have a calibration device, you could calibrate your i-mac and make it emulate an sRGB gamut screen. Now the problem with that is that when you watch your videos on YouTube or vimeo, they will be even more washed out since you are emulating sRGB. IMHO, every video editor should be working on at least 2 screens, so the practical work -around while we wait for Adobe to come to their senses, is to have a second screen emulating sRGB and that is where you should put the program monitor panel. Keep your i-mac screen set to the i-mac profile, or better yet, profile is to something like D65, 120 cd/m2, and native gamma. That way, your web browsers will look good, & your play back with Quick Time will look good, and so will YouTube and vimeo.  VLC, will look over saturated on the i-mac screen since it has the same problem as PP Pro, namely being stuck in Rec 709, but it will look good on the second screen that is emulating sRGB. This may not be as belt and suspenders a solution as a dedicated broadcast monitor, but at least your clients won't question your abilities. I happen to be working with a Mac Pro, so I have 2 external screens, one is an NEC multi sync PA272W, which can be profiled to a wide range of working spaces including Adobe RGB, sRGB, Broadcast tv, and even Digital Cinema via its excellent Spectra-view software. I highly recommend this monitor if you are looking for a monitor to sit beside your wide gamut i-mac. My other monitor is an Eizio, which I have deprecated to run in sRGB emulation. I have profiled the Eizo with the Color Navigator software and an X-Rite Color Munki. It is easy to convert the Eizo back to a wide gamut profile when needed. I sometimes edit video on my 2013 MacBookPro, and I don't see such a problem because the MacBook Pro screen is not wide gamut, which hides the problem (even if the problem is still there)….  hope this helps...

    jsyboy75Author
    Inspiring
    February 12, 2018

    That's all really interesting maphoto, I will re read and properly digest. As an aside - I've just exported a 50 second timeline of GoPro footage - no effects, no grade, NTSC (don't ask) - export took 50 seconds, ie realtime - that's not very fast for an iMac Pro. Have you optimised yours for faster exports?

    Participating Frequently
    February 13, 2018

    I've done what I can do. GeekBench report pegs this machine at 23975. Not sure how that translates into exports- but it does seem to export fairly quickly...generally better than real time by a large margin...even with filters etc...I have an Nvidia Quadro 5000 in it...I would guess that your GPU's are faster than mine...

    francis-crossman10980533
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    February 10, 2018

    Am I right in assuming the original title of this post "Colour grade not exporting with Premiere Pro" is a bit overstated?  Your color grades ARE exporting, they are just not exactly looking the same when you view them in certain players?

    francis-crossman10980533
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    February 10, 2018

    It's not a new problem, and it's small enough that it has gone largely unnoticed for the vast majority of people.  But video pros have been battling hardcore with this problem for something like 10 years - no joke.  It's quite possible that your eye is just now picking up on it.  I remember that moment for myself - crazy-making!

    To be absolutely clear about the "wrongness" I am talking about - it's not a huge wild shift.  It's a slight lift in Gamma - meaning that absolute black point and absolute white point are not affected, but the midtones a lifted a bit.  This causes the image to look a little less contrasty and sometimes a bit washed out.  But I'm not talking about wild shifts here. 

    If you are experiencing crazy big shifts, that is something YOU are doing I am very sorry to say.  This small display gamma problem will most likely sail right over your clients head.

    jsyboy75Author
    Inspiring
    February 10, 2018

    I understand. I’m not doing anything different to what I have done before. The problem is more pronounced on the new machine (I had not noticed it before and given my OCD levels that means it was fine until now!) Install of Premiere is new but all settings remain the same as before.

    francis-crossman10980533
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    February 10, 2018

    Grade your project and make it look good in PPro on a monitor that you trust - then export using one of the Vimeo presets.  It's as simple as that.

    This is part you are not going to like - Safari and Chrome will display your video incorrectly - it's not Vimeo's fault - it's not Premiere Pro's fault.  But try viewing your video in Firefox, or on your phone, or on a smart TV.  As R Neil Haugen has mentioned, the best we can do is stick to the standards and not try to out-guess them. 

    Welcome to the wild wild west of video color management.

    jsyboy75Author
    Inspiring
    February 10, 2018

    And how do I explain that to my client who asked for more colour on a washed out edit that looked fine in Premiere. I’m not really trying to out guess them, I just want to export what I see on the screen.

    R Neil Haugen
    Legend
    February 10, 2018

    And how do I explain that to my client who asked for more colour on a washed out edit that looked fine in Premiere. I’m not really trying to out guess them, I just want to export what I see on the screen.

    Colorists deal with this every day. Of course, with sit-in clients, it gets worse: if you have a program monitor for yourself, and another screen for clients ... and they suddenly look over your shoulder at your screen ... a VERY common request is "make that screen look like this one!"

    Note, they're both expensive monitors for broadcast use, calibrated with hundreds of 'points' for the LUTs in the external boxes that run them both. But no two screens, no matter how high-end, no matter how incredibly tightly color calibrated, will ever look exactly alike. So most colorists try and set their suites so the clients just can't see the colorist's grading monitor.

    So ... explain to your client and demonstrate. See, with the screen setup right, VLC, Potplayer, it's fine. QuickTime ... it's not. And see ... in Safari/Chrome with their poor excuse for color management, not so good; Firefox, much better.

    It's also good to have a couple reference videos to show in each of those. So, your perfect grade looks like X in Chrome ...  but see this, your skin tones match this movie/tv-show/whatever that's also professionally produced. Ergo ... you're hitting Standard Pro Level.

    When they see the way it looks different on different browsers/players on the same screen with the same monitor setup, well ... that's a puzzler for most people, but hopefully they'll accept your expertise at that point.

    Neil

    Everyone's mileage always varies ...
    Participating Frequently
    February 9, 2018

    jsyboy75 has put his finger on the problem and that is that Adobe has rigged PP Pro to ALWAYS have the program monitor display rec 709 NO MATTER WHAT the actual monitor profile is. This is being done behind the scenes and there are no controls to override it. That is fine if your output is ALWAYS going to be displayed on a reasonably new or calibrated TV screen, but since anything exported from the timeline in PP Pro is "untagged" in terms of a color profile, the export will display in the monitor color space, which for most of us is NOT rec. 709. If you want to see it in rec. 709 on your computer, you need to profile your monitor to rec. 709. This is true both for QuickTime and for Vimeo and YouTube as displayed on a wide gamut screen. The closer the computer monitor is to sRGB or rec 709, the closer QuickTime and Vimeo and YouTube will look to what is ALWAYS displayed in the PP Pro program monitor. Neil is correct with this statement..."One of the issues with PrPro is that some folks are now getting specs to deliver in P3 or Rec2020, and PrPro isn't really setup to do that. Which is why we all need more color managing tools so PrPro isn't only Rec709.

    jsyboy75Author
    Inspiring
    February 9, 2018

    Thank you. And with this in mind the iMac therefore cannot be used at an All In One machine since the only way to grade is on an external monitor. If this is not resolved and is in fact the case then I have bought the wrong machine and should have bought a tower with external monitors.

    However since Adobe is able to override the display settings of the monitor it MUST therefore be able to NOT override it which would solve this problem very easily.

    Participating Frequently
    February 9, 2018

    well not exactly...if you set the I-mac monitor profile to rec 709 (via the system preferences>display>color), then your QuickTime, youtube and vimeo will look the same as your monitor profile in PP Pro. Unfortunately, most folks are looking at video on computer screens and not tv screens. vimeo has something called HDR video- which they say has more color depth or something- but only runs on specific HDR screens...Luminous colors, stunning high quality: HDR has arrived on Vimeo I agree with Neil that Adobe needs to give us the option of having the PP Pro program monitor show a full range of color profile options including your own monitor profile. They can do it for Photoshop- so we know they can do it...

    jsyboy75Author
    Inspiring
    February 9, 2018

    I don't know if it's sRGB but it doesn't change. Agreed, however this is not for personal use - an iMac Pro may be overkill for the home user!

    francis-crossman10980533
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    February 9, 2018

    As R Neil Haugen suggests, the first thing you should do is set your display profile to Rec709 Gamma 2.4.  That is the first step in being able to trust anything you see in PPro or out.   Then - it sounds to me like you may be getting sucked into the dreaded Quicktime player gamma issue. I recommend using VLC player to evaluate your exported files.  If it looks the same in VLC player and the Premiere Pro program monitor, that rules out other issues  Quicktime player has had a LONG standing issue with displaying video at the wrong gamma setting and there is no way to force it to display correctly - in short, do not use Quicktime player to QC videos.

    When you bring exported footage back into PPro it SHOULD look exactly the same as the project in the Program Monitor.  If it does not, you've got some other problem

    And now on to the real fun - web browsers are also mostly displaying things at the wrong gamma.  Try comparing your video on Safari/Chrome/Firefox.  In my experience, Firefox looks "correct" while the other two do not.  One approach to mitigate this is to over-grade (as you state above) for web delivery.  Of course, this does not instill confidence, does it?

    In the end, Premiere Pro does create accurately renders; if it does not, you have a problem that can be fixed.  The real problem is with players and browsers not displaying these files correctly.

    jimbo_hippo
    Inspiring
    February 9, 2018

    I've just followed your recommendations there Francis and RNH. Been wondering what the proper settings should be recently so thanks for the input. The colour profile isn't a million miles from what my MacBook Pro uses as default so at least I know everything I've created on this machine previously isn't miles out!

    I think with the advent of affordable but impressive cameras like the Pannys and Sonys where even at entry level, you can get into some properly cinematic shooting, the woes of not having a proper broadcast setup will become more and more of a challenge and we'll have to find workarounds. I've returned to cameras after two decades. Last time I wielded one in anger it was the size of a house and had a BetaCam or Umatic tape in it. I now have a GH4 in my pocket. My advice for anyone not wanting to buy or not being able to afford a full broadcast monitor setup is to learn how to use and trust Lumetri's scopes. I often edit on the move in difficult environments and if you're on transport with scenery flicking by and constant shifts in light, you have to lean on your scopes to get a rough grade then return when it's more civilised. I'm sure there are a few broadcast professionals choking on their digestive reading this but that's the reality of low end production these days. Sorry for being a heathen ;-)

    R Neil Haugen
    Legend
    February 9, 2018

    The scopes in PrPro aren't perfect. But you're correct, make sure you're within 0-100, and no saturation spikes go outside the bounding box in the Vectorscope, and for most computer/tv "personal use",  it will be usable.

    Neil

    Everyone's mileage always varies ...