Professional Impact of Systemic Software Instability

[Flame2bits]

The current state of the Adobe Creative Cloud ecosystem has become a significant liability to my professional practice. The shift toward a continuous subscription model appears to have prioritized rapid release cycles over fundamental stability, resulting in a product that is increasingly unfit for high-stakes production environments. 

Currently, my workflow efficiency has inverted: I am spending 60% of my billable hours troubleshooting software regressions and only 40% on creative output. Today so far since 10.00 (now its 13.00) 100%. My kids are waiting for me to finish a project so we can get out and do stuff. The recurring technical failures are no longer marginal; they are systemic:

• Failure of Core Functions: Basic UI responsiveness—including spacebar playback, playhead tracking, and global search functionality—is consistently unreliable.

• Version Fragmentation: The "clean install" requirement for every minor update, coupled with the loss of plugin parity and legacy project incompatibility, creates an unsustainable administrative burden.

• The Personal Cost: This lack of reliability doesn't just impact my bottom line; it erodes the boundary between my professional and personal life, consuming time that should be reserved for my family.

Reliability is the primary feature I am paying for. Currently, Adobe is failing to deliver on that contract. Bigly.

[RjL190365]

Did you mean "slow down the major version release cycle" or "slow down the point release cycle"? If the former, this would result in a software falling far behind everybody else in both features and codec support, which would be a regression instead of progress (for example, video support would have been limited to old codecs fewer and fewer people are currently using). The hardware industry is pushing everybody to speed up thevupdate cycle. Otherwise, a video editing program would turn into a very niche product compatible only with legacy codecs. In that "slow down the major version release cycle" scenario, you would have achieved a Pyrrhic victory.

[R Neil Haugen]

Subscription versus non-subscription has no effect on stability. Resolve is not subscription and each new major version since around R17 has been less stable than the preceding version.

I think two things are in play here.

First, trying to make a complex NLE that works across all OS/hardware/media/workflow combinations is a ridiculously difficult objective.

Second, hardware makers have expanded the variety and capabilities of their gear and there are more major suppliers. Just for monitor feeding, it isn't just AMD and Nvidia , there's ARC and various iGPUs and others that must be coded for.

It's a vastly more complex job than it used to be.

Now throw in all the machine learning stuff that yes, many are demanding. From text based editing through bin searches through masking that is actually roto capabilities to auto this and that. Add in many different color spaces and gamuts of the media involved and different needs for export deliverables. 

[PaulMurphy]

It’s clear you’re dealing with some serious frustrations, and I can see how that would take a toll.

For contrast, I’ve been editing some fairly complex longform projects in the latest version without major issues. If you're open to sharing details like your system specs, OS, Premiere version, and media formats, others here might be able to help identify what's going wrong.