Skip to main content
Inspiring
September 18, 2018
Answered

Editing Anamorphic 2944 x 2160

  • September 18, 2018
  • 6 replies
  • 11034 views

Hey guys, I'm editing some Arri Anamorphic 2k footage, aspect ratio is 2944 x 2160. If you're familiar with this ratio, you know that once you desqueeze the footage and bring the clips into Premiere, it has extra black padding on the left and right.

What is the proper sequence settings / dimensions I should be editing this footage in?

Here are some options I've come across on message boards:

1) Edit in the native sequence, 2944 x 2160 and scale up the clips to eliminate the extra padding.

2) Edit in 2880 x 2160, no scaling required.

3) Edit in a 2048 x 858 sequence, and scale the clips to fit

My final delivery will be in 1080p, by the way. So, I'd like to edit everything in the high res sequences, lay graphics over the top etc. and then export out at 1080p, unless that's not the best way. Would love to hear suggestions.

Thank you, and sincerely appreciate any help I can get.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer jonathand80819138

Ah, I see. Guess I was wondering what the industry standard workflow is when dealing with this 2K, 2944 x 2160 anamorphic footage shot on the alexa mini, when delivering for broadcast at 1080p. Maybe there isn't one? From what I gather, it's pretty much up to me to determine how the end product should be cropped within the 1080 comp.

6 replies

Mike Dziennik
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 19, 2018

Regardless of how you perform your de-squeezing, scaling etc. you should probably work in a 1920x1080 sequence - some effects (such as denoising) and text might not render at their best if you are working in a frame size different from your delivery and applying scaling after the fact.

Ann Bens
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 19, 2018

On the otherhand if you want to use WS you need to nest.

juanmario
Participating Frequently
September 19, 2018

jonathand80819138  escribió

it has extra black padding on the left and right.

The sequence is not well configured:

jonathand80819138  escribió

What is the proper sequence settings / dimensions I should be editing this footage in?

In the project panel where the clip is located, right click on the clip and select New clip sequence. With this you configure the correct resolution. If you want a more fluid edition, otherwise it will increase the processing during editing.

jonathand80819138  escribió

My final delivery will be in 1080p,

In Export Settings, you select your preset 1080, and in the export monitor, Output> Source Scaling> Scale to Fill.

Inspiring
September 19, 2018

Also, looking to end up with 16x9 final export...but cropped to appear the way it was shot, so it would 16x9 but letter boxed, if that makes sense.

chrisw44157881
Inspiring
September 19, 2018

you can't change the laws of physics. either crop or pad. two, there are, no more no less.

Aspect Ratio = (Horizontal Resolution / Vertical Resolution) × Pixel Aspect Ratio

so your AR = 2.66666 square

and 16:9 = 1.77 square

if you had to keep AR, 2.6 square would be 1920/720 square pixels or 2k par 2.6 2880x1080.

hdtv is 1920x720 par 2.6 pad or 1920x1080 crop/zoom.

Inspiring
September 19, 2018

I guess what I'm asking is, should I just scale the native clips to fit the 1080 comp, and just apply the 2.39 matte over the top? Just feels like strange workflow. Just don't understand why the clips don't desqueeze to automatically fit the 2.39 crop. The extra step is annoying.

R Neil Haugen
Legend
September 19, 2018

Maybe?

I'm still not understanding exactly what you're expecting to end up with ... a long-narrow or standard 16:9 final image/export.

Neil

Everyone's mileage always varies ...
jonathand80819138AuthorCorrect answer
Inspiring
September 19, 2018

Ah, I see. Guess I was wondering what the industry standard workflow is when dealing with this 2K, 2944 x 2160 anamorphic footage shot on the alexa mini, when delivering for broadcast at 1080p. Maybe there isn't one? From what I gather, it's pretty much up to me to determine how the end product should be cropped within the 1080 comp.

R Neil Haugen
Legend
September 18, 2018

I found this from a blog on Frame.io ... one of my fav places to get interesting info these days.

To de-squeeze anamorphic footage in Premiere, highlight the clips in question, right click and hover to modify and click on interpret footage.

Screen Shot 2018 02 03 at 11.49.32 PM

Once there, under Pixel Aspect Ratio click the Conform to: toggle and select Anamorphic 2:1 in the dropdown menu.

Screen Shot 2018 02 03 at 11.50.44 PM

Premiere will then interpret that footage moving forward as anamorphic and it will be de-squeezed. You can do this for all of your footage at once if you have it all imported.

Does this answer your needs?

Neil

Everyone's mileage always varies ...
Inspiring
September 18, 2018

The footage is already de-squeezed. I don't need to do it. I'm just trying to determine the proper sequence settings to edit my picture in,taking in consideration I'll be delivering for broadcast at 1080. I want to make sure I'm framing the footage correctly etc. and getting the most out the native framing and how it was intended to be viewed.

R Neil Haugen
Legend
September 18, 2018

Oh, right. For that question, I've seen several editors with workflows where they used a mask to proportion on a track above the media, but left the media sequence at native pixel dimensions. They could toggle the mask layer on/off at will of course to see what the 'final' would look like. One commented he preferred this to automatically scaling to final as this way he could see exactly where he wanted to scale the underlying clip up/down on the track as it tended to vary per clip, even at times within a clip.

Of course, depending on how well the DOP shot it, it might work to just set per final ratio and auto-scale. With Set To rather than Scale To set as your option in the preferences, you still have scaling after-the-drop as needed.

Um ... that's nice media to work with. Enjoy!

Neil

Everyone's mileage always varies ...
Legend
September 18, 2018

My preference is to edit in a sequence matching the highest resolution needed for delivery, so I'd choose 3.

Inspiring
September 18, 2018

So, for you would that mean taking the 2944 x 2160 clips and scale them down to fit the 1080 comp?

Legend
September 18, 2018

Sort of.  I'd edit in a sequence at the correct aspect ratio, scaling them down to that (or not, if reframing is needed).  The software would add the necessary black bars for 1080 delivery, but still allow a proper "no black" export of 2048 x 848.