Skip to main content
Inspiring
April 19, 2019
질문

want to grade video for film look, but also saturate a particular coloured object.

  • April 19, 2019
  • 6 답변들
  • 3136 조회

I shot some talking head footage on D610 being ingested into BlackMagic Video Express. It's tonally flat and a bit overexposed. There's a solid block of colour on the bkgd poster in the background of shot behind the speaker's head. I want to get this colour of the poster as close to "on brand" as possible or at least over saturate it in preference to under saturating it. The colour teal: R98 G203 B201 but rendering more like R139 G159 B152 in the uncorrected footage (that's a long way from home kiddo!).

I know in photoshop I'd need to isolate the area by colour selection or create a mask (harder in Premier as the speaker's head is in front of the coloured area) and then use the

I want to use a LUT/Lumetri Color preset and then modify it to get more film look and colour into the skin tones, and it does lift the saturation of this teal colour a bit but not enough. 

이 주제는 답변이 닫혔습니다.

6 답변

wideEyedPupil작성자
Inspiring
April 19, 2019

Bug isnt in PPro CC 2018 so i want to export my project to that version. It's a very simple project with two source files (shots) and about 8 cuts from each in simple edits. I've never used an EDL before, heard about for decades… is that the best way to get my edit info out of PPro 2019 into PPro 2018? Will try!

wideEyedPupil작성자
Inspiring
April 19, 2019

this bug is happening on Master clip and individual timeline clips too. And confirmed it happens on renders. Each spec of noise is 8x8 = 64 pixels (seems like VRAM related coding issue or something doesn't it?), usually all the pixels in a block will be effected but not always see the one on right of image.

[Please do not double post different issue, mod]

wideEyedPupil작성자
Inspiring
April 19, 2019

Ok this would  have worked, I isolated the colour range easily thanks to your instructions, Neil. Pumped up the saturation for it. But there's a bug in PPro 13.x Lumetri Color. I came across a thread about it only a couple of hours ago and then like some virus it grabbed me. You can see in this vide, happens in renders too according to what I read (haven't tested yet). In the video I turn off HSL Secondaries tab 7 seconds before the end of the video and the "noise" stops.

https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZUfkO7ZIqDbQWO44H76yne2OXNTIuc9CouX

How did this get through QA Adobe? You're one of the biggest creative software companies in the world (if not the biggest) and yet apps seem to be getting more buggy and less patched than since the shaky software of single app shared memory space of the 90s. 

wideEyedPupil작성자
Inspiring
April 19, 2019

By film look I just meant I'm going to grading for more warmth in the skin tone, and probably some more contrast, didn't have anything firm in mind, just that it was going to change. DSLRs even when not outputting in a Log colourspace/codec tend towards flat footage from what I've seen. Obviously a LUT warming skin tones is not going to be lifting the teal colour much (other than general saturation increase), so that was kind of what I was getting at, the conflicting goals as you pointed out in your first response, Neil.

R Neil Haugen
Legend
April 19, 2019

Oh ... as to the "film" look. Everybody's idea of a "film look" is different. And which film look?

The 70's low-saturation with rolled off deep shadows (NO blacks) and soft "whites"?

The highly saturated stuff with not a lot of shadow detail?

The tendency of some of the Fuji stocks to have brilliant greens and subdued reds?

The Kodak tendency to emphasize either the soft warm colors, or produce brighter reds/blues?

BIG massive hard-edged grain ... or soft subtle grain?

The stocks that had a moderate to fair "sharpness" of local contrast inherent in them, or the ones that bluntly were pretty soft for detail/local-contrast?

"Tonally flat and a bit over-exposed" sounds like a ton of early/mid-70's flicks. A few of which I've heard people say "too bad they haven't restored that one yet, it's clearly lost saturation and just has no blacks anymore." Having seen the original in the theatre ... it never HAD blacks or saturation.

A colorist friend is always doing tutorials on Mixinglight about doing 'filmic' grades with say music videos. What he thinks of as 'filmic' is emulating a narrow set 16mm stocks, with a lot of moderately hard pretty-good sized grain, where you need to actually soften (take sharpness DOWN) before applying the grain effect or it looks ... wrong. TOO sharp. Shadows are soft to a point, then drop to near-black. Highlights are a bit softer but still roll-off notably.

And ... saturation is mainly in the areas around 30-75 on the IRE/nits scale, really rolls off in both shadows and highlights.

So ... what's your idea of a "film look"?

Neil

Everyone's mileage always varies ...
Legend
April 19, 2019
Everybody's idea of a "film look" is different.

I disagree.  I think the term "film look" has but one meaning, motion cadence.  It means shooting at 24 fps, and only that.  All the other properties associated with professional production, things like composition, lighting, grading, etc, can all be ignored and the material will still look like film.  Witness any 16 mm news real, for example.

But even when you have all those other properties in line, if the frame rate exceeds 24 fps, it will look like "video".  Witness The Hobbit at 48 fps.

"Film look" means 24 fps.  If you're not referring to motion cadence, then I think you're using the term "film look" erroneously.

R Neil Haugen
Legend
April 19, 2019

As I noted, everyone has their own definition. Shutter angle is a large part for many. But I've read so many articles and tutorials from professional colorists working to get their film look ... with radically different expectations and results.

Neil

Everyone's mileage always varies ...
R Neil Haugen
Legend
April 19, 2019

You have two different things there ... correct for them differently.

Correct for general tonal work/color and skin tones first, then use the HSL Secondaries tab or the Curves tab to isolate the color of the background poster and modify it for the change you need.

In the HSL tab, first isolate the color for hue, saturation and luma or any combination of one, two or three of those for tightest match. It's best to use a 'mask', so after clicking, set the mask to maybe grey/color to select only those pixels you want to change. Turn off the mask. Then use the tonal/color controls that are the bottom half of that tab to make the change needed.

Or ... in the new Curves panel, select the poster in the Hue v Hue tab with the eyedropper tool. Then adjust the center point up/down to get the color change you want.

Neil

Everyone's mileage always varies ...