Skip to main content
L
Lu Pina
Participating Frequently
July 25, 2022
解決済み

Adobe rejeita fotos sob a alegação de problemas técnicos.

  • July 25, 2022
  • 返信数 3.
  • 695 ビュー

Estou bem frustrado com a Adobe Stock.

Entendo que há sempre espaço para melhorarmos uma foto, mas no entanto posso assegurar com base na minha formação artística que não existe o certo e o errado quando se trata de uma arte ou de uma foto. 

 

A Adobe pode reprovar uma foto, duas fotos, três fotos sob a mesma alegação, mas quando reprova praticamente todas as fotos, as mesmas que são aceitas inclusive em outras plataforma da mesma relevância, acredito que falta então transparência.

 

As fotos foram tiradas e tratadas na pós produção, com o cuidado para não ter problemas técnicos, mas mesmo assim a Adobe insiste em reprová-las simplesmente dizendo que tem problemas técnicos. Eu não gostaria de fazer isso, ma diante das circustâncias eu irei cancelar o projeto que havia inserido o Adobre Stock, por falta de transparência.

このトピックへの返信は締め切られました。
解決に役立った回答 jacquelingphoto2017

Hi @Lu Pina ,

I believe you are on this forum because you read the entire rejection notice. In that case you cannot fairly say that Adobe is not transparent because you have not completed the process to receive the transparent information that you're expecting. The notice continued to say - You might also find the Academy Board Forum to be a helpful resource. You're welcome to post your image there for constructive feedback from a group of your peers. Here's the link: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors/bd-p/Stock-Contributors 

This is the provision that Adobe puts in place to have the issues of your files highlighted. There are many who upload to Adobe, only to realize that what is accepted in their profession is not acceptable for stock photography.

 

Also did you read the information at the link provided for you in the rejection notice?

The following are some of what you need to know:

Seven Tips for Getting Your Photos Accepted.

All the information at the Contributor Learn Support.

And this detailed List Of What Is Required for you to earn from stock photography.

Read up on all the information in the above links. Look at your photos and see if they really meet the mark. Also, upload two of those rejected here for us to help you to identify the errors.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

 

返信数 3

jacquelingphoto2017
Community Expert
jacquelingphoto2017Community Expert解決！
Community Expert
July 26, 2022

Hi @Lu Pina ,

I believe you are on this forum because you read the entire rejection notice. In that case you cannot fairly say that Adobe is not transparent because you have not completed the process to receive the transparent information that you're expecting. The notice continued to say - You might also find the Academy Board Forum to be a helpful resource. You're welcome to post your image there for constructive feedback from a group of your peers. Here's the link: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors/bd-p/Stock-Contributors 

This is the provision that Adobe puts in place to have the issues of your files highlighted. There are many who upload to Adobe, only to realize that what is accepted in their profession is not acceptable for stock photography.

 

Also did you read the information at the link provided for you in the rejection notice?

The following are some of what you need to know:

Seven Tips for Getting Your Photos Accepted.

All the information at the Contributor Learn Support.

And this detailed List Of What Is Required for you to earn from stock photography.

Read up on all the information in the above links. Look at your photos and see if they really meet the mark. Also, upload two of those rejected here for us to help you to identify the errors.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

 

    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    July 25, 2022

    Adobe Stock is NOT an art gallery.  It's a microstock agency.   Microstock agencies have submission requirements and quality standards based on what their customers actually purchase, not what contributors think they will purchase.  Also ranting about how great you are and how terrible Adobe Stock is doesn't change anything.

     

    If you don't want to play the game by Adobe's rules, that's fine.  You may opt out of the program anytime you wish. Maybe you'll have better luck at other stock agencies.  

     

    Whatever you decide, I wish you good luck.

     

    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
      L
      Lu Pina作成者
      Participating Frequently
      July 25, 2022

      Pela forma que você e o seu colega escrevem, é notório que estou no lugar errado. Como citei acima, eu cheguei aqui pensando que estava no suporte ténico. Encerre por favor este post e esqueça o assunto. Faça o seu trabalho de conselheiro, e tudo bem. Mas não é o meu caso! 

       

      Também desejo boa sorte! 

      Nancy OShea
      Community Expert
      Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      July 25, 2022

      As you wish,  discussion locked at user's request.

       

      Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
        Jill_C
        Community Expert
        Jill_CCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        July 25, 2022

        If you would like to upload a few images here, the Community members will indicate what technical issues we see. Acceptance by other stock agencies is no guarantee that your images will meet the Adobe quality standard.

         

        Jill C., Forum Volunteer
        L
        Lu Pina作成者
        Participating Frequently
        July 25, 2022

        Mencionei outras plataformas para reforçar o meu ponto sobre a recusa constante da Adobe, não para ter garantia obvialmente. Isso seria muito raso! E não devo colocar aqui fotos minhas para serem analisadas. Se há algo errado do ponto de vista técnico, é de extrema importância que a Adobe informe o que está errado quando eu as envio, sem cercear a criatividade do fotógrafo. 

         

        O que são problemas técnicos? Exposição, enquadramento, foco, contraste, cor? Onde estão eles? Será que é preferência pessoal ou avaliação de algum algorítimo? Quais são os problemas?

         

        Não me oponho a ser avaliado, de forma alguma, eu só preciso entender os critérios, pois me custou subrir minhas fotos acreditando na plataforma e na sua política anunciada. Podem recusá-las todas, mas em algum momento, certamente, não haverá mais interesse na relação.

         

        Fica a observação que a arte, seja através da música, da pintura, da dramaturgia, e claro, de uma foto, tem por trás uma forma de expressão. A Adobe não pode podar a expressão de alguém. 

         

        Por isso, estou abandonando a plataforma, pois tanto como contribuidor como cliente, sei que o trabalho de muita gente está sendo negado por critétios obscuros ou pessoais.

         

         

        Jill_C
        Community Expert
        Jill_CCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        July 25, 2022

        After more than a year here in the Community evaluating rejected images I can tell you that the primary technical issues are soft focus, overexposure (including blownout areas), underexposure, noise, chromatic aberration, leaning horizons, leaning verticals, white balance, artifacts and poor composition. Adobe Stock is not a gallery for you to display your "art". Adobe requires high quality images with commercial appeal since that's what Buyers expect. It is very uncommon for a Contributor to post a rejected image here for which the Community members are unable to identify at least one, and often more, technical issues. Sometimes those images are able to be re-edited and re-uploaded and are then accepted by Adobe.

         

        There are other outlets for you to sell your art. You can create your own website on SmugMug for instance, and not be constrained by any of Adobe's requirements. 

         

        If you have decided to close your Adobe Stock account, you will need to contact Adobe directly. The members of this forum are not Adobe employees and cannot help you with that.

        Jill C., Forum Volunteer
        契約条件Accessibility statement
        Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices