I can't figure out or understand the following
99% of my photo rejections is for the following reason:
"Thanks for submitting your file for review.
Unfortunately, during our review we found that this file does not meet the Adobe Stock’s Illustrative Editorial Guidelines.
We are looking for imagery intended to illustrate articles on current events and news, focused on conceptual imagery using real brands and products to convey strong ideas.
The most common cases for rejection from that collection are:
- The file includes identifiable people.
- The file is news or documentary editorial.
- The file did not have a strong editorial concept."
I spent hours trying to understand Adobe Stock’s Illustrative Editorial Guidelines but I can't wrap my head around it. Attached is the image they rejected
1. Can anyone tell me specifically what is lacking in the image that doesn't meet the Editorial Guidelines?
2. If I redidd the shot, what could I change in the image to meet the Editorial Guidlines?
3. In another post you all tried to explain it but I plead ignorance and admit it went over my head. If you try to explain it again, maybe showing images that meet the editorial requirements would help or explain it as if explaining it to a 5th grader.
Sorry for not grasping this.. I read the guidelines and when that didn't help me understand I turn to the internet for my research. It didn't help because I still get the same rejections reason and it just drives me crazy that I can't figure it out. I never resubmitted a rejected image in the past but for experimental purposes if you recommend what I could change to make this image acceptable I'll change it and resubmit to see if it passes the editorial guidlines.
Thanks Again
