Rejected

[Giovanni5E9C]

Why? Thanks for your suggestions!

[Test Screen Name]

Adobe TOLD you why. What did Adobe say? Don't make us guess, it would be wasting your valuable time!

[Giovanni5E9C]

Adobe suggests asking you! 🙂

[Abambo]

No, Adobe gave you a rejection reason: Reasons content is rejected at Adobe Stock. That reason is important for us so that we do not have to guess.

If I'll have to guess: Technical issues.

I would say the image is underexposed, may have a wrong white balance and especially important, it has a cluttered foreground, which makes your main subject less appealing.

If you compare your picture to the thousands of entries of a similar subject, you will find probably your picture relatively weak... But as I said, this is only guesswork.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[Test Screen Name]

Adobe DID give you a reason, please repeat what they said. Again, don't make us guess! We are not Adobe staff and can't look at your account.

[Giovanni5E9C]

I'm sorry, but I didn't understand your question ... Adobe told me that my photo was rejected for "technical reasons". Thank you!

[RALPH_L]

Hello @Giovanni5E9C , for one you need to sharpen the photo, darken your highlights and lighten up the shadows.

Like this:

[Giovanni5E9C]

I appreciate your suggestion, but since I am a frequenter of the woods and I have my own vision of nature, I consider your modification "unnatural" ... your intervention takes away a certain poetry from the original image. Of course that's my opinion! 🙂

[Test Screen Name]

I think your opinion is a good one. However, if you want to produce commercial photography, it has to match the client's wishes, not your own...

[Abambo]

You have a great talent not to answer the questions that you get asked. Of course, that's my opinion. 🙂

[Giovanni5E9C]

sorry, but I'm a beginner in this forum! 🙂

[Abambo]

sorry, but I'm a beginner in this forum! 🙂

By @Giovanni5E9C

I'm sometimes overly sarcastic, when we ask twice or more the same question and get not the adequate response... It's not a big deal, it was just in my fingertips... 😄 . As we do not have insight into your account, we need to have at least the little indication that Adobe gave you because there may be several reasons fitting:

• commercial appeal
• technical issues
• similar already submitted
• non-compliant
• and IP (not with a bunch of mushrooms, probably... except if the keywords are spiked with trade names 🙂 )

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Giovanni5E9C ,

These are nice mushrooms. However the bushes hide their beauty. Therefore I agree with @Abambo, the foreground is too cluttered. Also the picture has excess noise/grains.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author