Skip to main content
Alaska Dawn 907
Alaska Dawn 907
Known Participant
July 6, 2023
Answered

Rejection reason not given please advise

  • July 6, 2023
  • 2 replies
  • 3708 views

Hi,

Will someone please,  tell me why my upscale AI generative image from midjourney ,have a paid subscription so commercial use allowed, was rejected. No reason was given other than "quality issues". .I need constructive criticism or at least a direction to go . Then I can correct. I prompt in midjourney , image usually 1024 pixels by 1024 pixels, resolution 72 dpi.  I then upscale to 300 resolution and it gets me somewhere in 2048 px by 2048 , 300 dpi , ,24.0 M (don't know what that means?) what's wrong with it? Appreciate advice .

Thank you very much in advance .

Correct answer RALPH_L

I believe that upscaling is not allowed. Also, there is a white fringe (outline) to be seen.

2 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity Expert
Community Expert
July 6, 2023

A rejection reason is always given! QUALITY ISSUES is probably the most popular. Quality issues means that you should scan your assets for quality issues:

3363: Bad cutouts,

 

lines on the background,

In addition, the image is not sharp.

 

You need to get your image at a higher resolution (but that is pricier, if I'm correctly informed). Just upscaling a bad asset will enhance the faults.

 

What you call dpi is ppi, in a pixel image there are pixels and no dots! And that value is at most irrelevant, set it to whatever number you want. All that counts is the pixel size and consequently the MEGA PIXEL count (which needs to be at least 4 Megapixels). The 24M is the size in Megabytes that the uncompressed image has. It is irrelevant to stock.

 

I would recommend you to read about images and the different parameters, as you seem to struggle with the most basic (technical) information that is needed to produce quality assets. Whatever you want to do, a good amount of theory is needed.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td-p/13549435

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Alaska Dawn 907
Alaska Dawn 907Author
Known Participant
July 6, 2023

Thank you Ralph_L,

I am relatively new. 
I appreciate you revealing specifics ! So, if my understanding is correct, the original image was bad to start with? It's from midjourney .
I created the gradient background in photoshop app, supposed to be state of the art professional .

The cut out, selection was just select subject.

 

This part in quotes below I do not understand. Mega pixels? Photoshop app only gives me pixels . 

"What you call dpi is ppi, in a pixel image there are pixels and no dots! And that value is at most irrelevant, set it to whatever number you want. All that counts is the pixel size and consequently the MEGA PIXEL count (which needs to be at least 4 Megapixels). The 24M is the size in Megabytes that the uncompressed image has. It is irrelevant to stock." 

Trying to learn. Not giving up! 

D

 

T
Test Screen Name
Legend
July 6, 2023

"This part in quotes below I do not understand. Mega pixels? Photoshop app only gives me pixels . "

A megapixel is a million pixels (more or less). It's a common measure of the detail of a camera. But it's equally used to give a minimum size of a graphic file. Suppose you have an image 1920 by 1280 pixels. To get the number of pixels, multiply 1920 by 1280 = 2,457,600. We'd call that about 2.5 megapixels. So we can see that a picture this size doesn't reach Adobe's minimum size. Meanwhile 1024px square is just 1 megapixel.

You need to pay more to get a midjourney image that has more pixels, it's often said. Is this wrong?

    RALPH_L
    Community Expert
    RALPH_LCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
    Community Expert
    July 6, 2023

    I believe that upscaling is not allowed. Also, there is a white fringe (outline) to be seen.

    Abambo
    Community Expert
    AbamboCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    July 6, 2023
    quote

    I believe that upscaling is not allowed. Also, there is a white fringe (outline) to be seen.


    By @RALPH_L

    Upscaling is to be avoided. If it is done in an intelligent way, it is not exactly disallowed. All the trouble is, that most of the upscaling can be seen because also the faults get “enhanced”.

    ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
    Alaska Dawn 907
    Alaska Dawn 907Author
    Known Participant
    July 6, 2023

    But adobe stock rejects 1024 px as too small 

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices