Hi,
I recently got reminded during the exam process that I need to fill a right to the image, for an illustration, with a 100% fictive person. How can I avoid this kind of situation?
It doesn't make any sense as the person doesn't exist even in the real life.
Two examples were rejected :
It makes sense, as the moderator does not know, there is no ressemblance with a living person. Submit a property release where you sign as the property holder and the artist ("photographer"), where you declare in the description, that the image is not modeled after a real person.
Moderators need to be on the secure legal side. If they don't know, they will refuse. It's only like that, that a potential buyer get's protected.
BTW: nice work. I love especially the second one. But I would have preferred seeing the eyes wide open, as with the first one.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
AdChoices