Why did my photo get rejected?

[Numan30100543ert3]

I uploaded a photo but it got rejected, may I please know the reason of the rejection.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Check your pictures at 100% and you will see many artefacts. I also think that the asset is out of focus, but looking from my phone, that is a bit difficult to appreciate.

Edit:

This is your asset seen at 100%. In addition, the scripture may represent an IP violation. I do not read Arabic, but given that there is a logo on the cup, I guess that if it hadn't been refused with Quality Issues it would get an IP strike. You should take neutral cups for such pictures.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td...

[Zaid Al Hilali]

I do not read Arabic

By @Abambo

Let me help you with that 🙂

The text on the tea-cup reads "Michelin" just like the tyres brand or the restaurant's star rating.

[Jill_C]

Thanks! Then definitely another reason for rejecting the asset...

[Abambo]

I do not read Arabic

By @Abambo

Let me help you with that 🙂

The text on the tea-cup reads "Michelin" just like the tyres brand or the restaurant's star rating.

By @Zaid Al Hilali

You know that the tires and the restaurant rating guide from the same company are?

(Thanks for the help!)

[George_F]

With the handle cut off on the side and the background table angle appearing crooked, I think this photo isn't composed very well.  I agree with @Abambo that there are noticeable artefacts.  I wonder if heavy sharpening has been applied to try to correct soft focus?

[Abambo]

 I wonder if heavy sharpening has been applied to try to correct soft focus?

By @George_F

The “soft focus” looks like camera shake.