Copy link to clipboard
Copied
We prefer to use images of models NOT looking at the camera, especially the classic yet boring stock image of someone crossing their arms and looking at the camera. How do I filter out these types of images?
If it is not possible, please consider adding this to the filtering preferences. Thank you.
If you add this suggestion as an Idea, rather than in the Discussions category, other Stock users can upvote it for Adobe's consideration.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
We appreaciate your input, I have pass this information to product owner.
Best regards,
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I have the same request. Getty Images let you specify 'unposed' as a search term, and it returns images which are candid. I would like to see Adobe introduce more filters to allow for candid, reportage, unposed etc. Also, as 75% of my search results seem to be AI generative these days, please mention to the people generating these images that perfect people, arms folded, looking into the camera lens is fast becoming the hallmark of an AI generated image and will probably be rejected by the majority of designers and art directors, myself included.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
People with folded arms is probably becoming a hallmark of AI because it was trained on a hallmark of actual photos of people with folded arms. 🙂 Pre-AI days, I'd always come across hundreds of them back in the day.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you add this suggestion as an Idea, rather than in the Discussions category, other Stock users can upvote it for Adobe's consideration.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Where do I do that?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Make a new Post in this Community Forum and chose the Conversation type Idea.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I tend to title and keyword my images of people with "in profile" or "three-quarter profile." You might try using that in your search prompt.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Using a minus before the search term excludes that key word, so "-apple" means no apple. The contributor, however, needs to have added that keyword.