Alan Craven wrote: There has just been a fuss in the UK about the award of a photographic prize to a person who took someone elses published photograph, without permission, manipulated it, and submitted the modified image to the competition. She argued that nowhere in the terms and conditions did it state that the starting point for an entry must be a photograph that you took yourself. After much argument the award was witheld, I believe. Graeme Guy is rated one of the best amateur natural history photographers in the world, and regularly gets Champion Image and a bunch of medals in natural history exhibitions and salons all over the world. The humming birds below are an example of his work (you can view more HERE). Graeme was one of the speakers, and ran a couple of workshops at the PSNZ National Convention in Nelson in 2010, and I attended both workshops. In fact Graeme’s laptop would not play nicely with the projector, so I had to rush back to my hotel to get mine, and I still have his Powerpoint on it. I also had the nerve-racking privilege of teaching some HDR and Photoshop techniques to Graeme and 39 other similarly qualified photographers in two workshops that I had been invited to run. One of the rules in NZ Natural History competitions is that nowhere in the image is the ‘Hand-of-Man’ allowed to appear. Graeme told us that the humming birds are photographed with the aid of seven small flash guns set to 1/128 th power, which gives an effective shutter speed of about 1/30,000 th of a second, and that’s how he is able to freeze their rapid wing movement. I’ve also run a number of lighting workshops, and I asked Graeme how it was that with all that flash power involved, the background was not black? He answered that two of the seven flash guns are directed at a false background, which varies between a poster sized photograph printed on matt paper, or camouflage netting. So someone else in the audience asked how these false backgrounds could possibly comply with the Hand-of-Man rule. One of the main PSNZ Natural History judges, a Ron McKie, who happened to be a very good friend of Graeme’s came to his defence saying it was OK because these items were completely ‘out of focus’. Hmmm… stunned silence all round, and a change of the rules less than a year later.
... View more