I agree 100% with @BenPleysier , it's not advisable to make hard modifications to Wordpress code.   For this, there are various approaches that are preferable: home-made dedicated plugins, child template and/or functions.php file, code embed or snippet plugins... in short, there's no shortage of solutions.   For your more specific video needs, there are a number of plugins available out there, but the final choice will most depend on the features you're looking for... take a look at WP Video Lightbox, Responsive Lightbox & Gallery (with its surprising lightbox effects), WP Video Popup... to name just a few that come to mind...   just out of curiosity, what's so embarrassing about the use of plugins, which is the architectural basis of WP's operation? ... View more

Actually when I said, "The visuals are sick", I meant that they are superb, and well in the style... dope! ... View more

The visuals are sick, very poker, very gaming hall... that's already a good thing 😉 ... View more

I don't know the expectations of @Luigi2941351225vt , and @Ben M asked the right question. What do you expect from an AI within a code editor.   reading the previous answers posted by our community, every time the answer is somehow the orientation towards an automated solution generator... or as @osgood_ mentions... a new version template factory.   for my part, and so I join @Ben M , what is @Luigi2941351225vt waiting for, by asking this question, because , and for my own personall use, AI brings me much more since I use it than being a second hand that generates code for me, but much more...   it allows me to optimize my algorithms, il allows me to open new approaches, to refine concepts that I had difficulty to implement in an optimized way...   simply it helps me to continue learning ... while producing and coding like never before   ... View more

why not let people express themselves... and even if the conversation would become a lounge room chatter... whatever... anyway, if the conversation is exhausting you, why not simply ignore it, and just let it pass, after all the filters exist, ignore it. ... you don't know how many times I don't even open emails, just by seeing a topic, or the name of the person who just posted... lol... not even an ounce of Judeo-Christian guilt-tripping thought...   well just to add a layer... and get back to the main topic of this thread... sometimes the question is not about legislating a consideration, but rather about individual or group involvement, to see how the integration and consideration, in the broadest sense, of everyone's expectations, can be amended in the tools are they for governmental use, or not ... just to improve the daily lives of the greatest number in their uses for tools they pay for. ... View more

It seems to me that this discussion has taken a very different direction from its initial meaning, as often happens when a person expresses reluctance to answer the question they are asked. Let me rephrase the question: Dreamweaver, as a software, does not support accessibility (not just for the sites it allows to be developed, but as a tool itself). So what would be the context if an agency had to provide it to its teams? Several questions have diverted and provoked confusion, even though I have tried every time to refocus the debate by returning to point number 2. Despite this, every time the discussion returned to the discontinuity of DW...which is not the issue here.   2 - I have always believed that Section 508 requires software to be accessible to people with disabilities, especially when provided by federal agencies. So, what if Dreamweaver is used by a communications department (well, through a CC account) in a government agency? By @B i r n o u     ... View more

Maybe my English is not up to the task of understanding what is written, maybe I know DW badly.   Anyway, I have a completely different point of view about what the VSC document and accessibility tells me, or at least what I understand... and without using screenshots that eat up the whole commentary space, let me tells you what I got so far. DW's zoom management only affects the code view, not the DW's user interface... which is not the case with VSC. A person who sees badly the code, sees certainly badly the menus, the dialogues, etc... As for the Windows magnifying glass, it concerns Windows, not the software... and have you tried to use the Windows magnifying glass, which acts on all the screens (oh yes, sorry, as many developper, I use multiple screens)... and it's not at all ergonomic... if I zoom in on VSC, I don't necessarily want to zoom in on my entire desktop.   using a Dark theme, I feel like I'm confusing... using DW settings, sure the background is dark and you can play on two levels of dark, but what does that have to do with a high contrast theme, or with the complementary extensions that allow you to adjust the colours with a visual deficiency, and that are specially adapted?   What about adapting to full keyboard navigation? What about adjusting the TAB navigation ? What about screen reader optimisation? What about the adaptation of warning messages and dedicated signage? Specificaly, regarding colour adjustment and accessibility, what a paradox that Kuler is used, don't you think? What about the inclusion of the terminal in the VSC interface, which also becomes fully accessible? What about, and ... not to mention and ... etc... and so on... the liste is long... don't you think ?   As a result, no green check mark remains.... but the lampion of the good last one lights up... I know and use DW before it belongs to Macromedia... and believe me, you can't imagine how much I like this tool... proof is... I persist on this forum... but we owe it to ourselves to remain lucid... and preserve a real integrity to users, thread, and reality...   Clearly, regarding UI accessibility, don't you think that DW is far behind... it's so easy to recognize it...   Now the last point, and the main answer to the question, as for the use of this tool in government agencies, here in France... uh... all of them have a CC account... and thus have access to DW... and according to a large number of contacts on other Adobe forums with whom I often consult... it's the same across the Atlantic... CC is everywhere... so we come back to my initial question n°2... and so do the @Dee28407999w8d7 main question...  which cannot be evacuated with a nonchalant reversal of the sleeve... or by engaging in a parallel and entirely different debate ... ... View more

Dreamweaver is NOT receiving any new features.  It has been stagnant since 2021. So this discussion is futile. By @Nancy OShea   Admittedly, DW is undergoing minimal maintenance.... but the discussion is not necessarily futile, and discussing user needs may lead to a solution, perhaps outside the scope of this forum. and after all, it wouldn't be the first time that topics have gone beyond DW. but in saying that, I may be wrong... ? and I am sorry for that   Just for giggles, name or describe the accessibility features you think consumer software should be offering government agencies beyond what is already available from the computer's operating system? With that in mind, please name any consumer code editor that currently provides those features? By @Nancy OShea   I see that you may be a follower of Socratic irony, or perhaps it is simply an avoidance, a cop-out. Answering a question with a question... why not... but it doesn't bring much to the debate.   Anyway, personally, since @BenPleysier introduced me to VSC (thanks Ben 😉 ), as far as the code is concerned, I've turned to this tool, (as I always said, DW/Br/Fw) are still a wonderfill manager) and it's true that in terms of accessibility (in terms of the user interface, of course, because that's the question), it's taken care of and really listens to users... So to answer your question, and rather than listing what could be studied to meet the expectations of people with disabilities ... I encourage you to read the article dedicated to VSC and its handling of accessibility within its user interface ... https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/accessibility all is said... or at least it's a real good start     does this answer your question?... but I'm still not sure about point 2, which you still haven't answered 😉 2 - I have always believed that Section 508 requires software to be accessible to people with disabilities, especially when provided by federal agencies. So, what if Dreamweaver is used by a communications department (well, through a CC account) in a government agency? By @B i r n o u   ... View more

We were talking about DW's user interface not being compliant with accessibility standards, and instead of addressing the issue, you tried to deflect the discussion by bringing up the history lesson on the ADA and Section 508, but I think you missed the point. So when you were asked a direct question about the consequences of using such software in a government agency (point 2 of my last comment), you once again, as very often in sensible subject, chose to dodge the question and go off on another tangent. I mean, come on :). Let's stick to the topic and have a productive conversation, a solution that ensures accessibility for all, shall we? What about point 2... which seems to me to be basically the substance of the original post of @Dee28407999w8d7 ?   ... View more

As I said, Dreamweaver is NOT a website; it's software. By @Nancy OShea   I am interested in this debate, please let me ask two questions.   1 - Does this mean that Section 508 does not include software as part of ADA compliance but only websites that need to comply? 2 - I have always believed that Section 508 requires software to be accessible to people with disabilities, especially when provided by federal agencies. So, what if Dreamweaver is used by a communications department (well, through a CC account) in a government agency? ... View more

For what it's worth, my aging workstation running Win10 (ver 22H2) never crashes.  Dreamweaver is very stable.  By @Nancy OShea   the fact that this bug is not reproducible in your context, does not mean that it is not active in other environments or contexts. it is not the general stability of DW that is in question, but only its stability when searching / replacing on large volume (on files in a transversal or vertical way) But if my system crashed as frequently as you say yours does, I would install CC on another computer to see if the problem persists. By @Nancy OShea   This is not the first time that search/replace concerns on large volumes, and on many systems have been raised and Adobe has never found a solution. as I say every time this problem resurfaces in the forum, it has been tested, retested, tracked, studied, logged, dumped, reproduced, observed... so unless to perform these tasks with other tools, nobody have not found a solution so far, and for my concern, I can only support those to whom this happens. "No you didn't enter the Twilight Zone, it happens, and as Chris Carter says, you are not alone" ... View more

Crashes are abnormal.  By @Nancy OShea   Yes, I completely agree, but unfortunately, these crashes of DW (crash, freeze), are recurrent when we launch researches replaced heavily loaded (large web sites, of large XML/JSON documents)... and it is not occasional, however do not occur systematically in all cases of figures (cases of figures that are difficult to identify)   Software is tested before it rolls out. By @Nancy OShea   Several times during different beta programs of DW this problem was declared, identified, studied,... we were several to support it, but unfortunately it could not be eradicated and is still part of the workflow. As some engineers said at the time of Macromedia, it is identified as a FOL (Fact Of Life)   I suspect a deeper problem that's goes beyond the scope of what this user-to-user community can provide. By @Nancy OShea   Yes @Nancy OShea , you can't say it better, especially since a year, or two ago, the engineers took the hand on my machine, they were able to see several times the bug, indentifiy it, retrieve the various logs and crash dump files, but once again, it seems to be a complexity that has difficulty to find solution.     This being said, and I'm not presenting this as a workaround, or a method to launch heavy duty searches and avoid crashes... but in general, by modifying the Windows startup file and removing all Adobe services (there can be up to ten of them depending on the facilities), I found that the machine consumed less resources, the fan blew less, and when running several tasks in parallel, it preserves some flexibility in using DW   ... View more

Well, I turned off all cloud stuff and haven't had this issue since. By @Dee28407999w8d7   By saying, turn off all the cloud things... I think we're probably talking about the same thing, but just in case, I'll point out for those who are interested, that for some time now I've had stopped all the Adobe services running at startup... and it's amazing how much calmer and more responsive the machine is since then. However, this has not solved the problem of intense replacement searches, either on large sites or on large documents. But for the daily use inter soft... what a gain of flexibility ... View more

Well, it's 2023 and as @Dee28407999w8d7 I still have huge trouble serach and replace in very large document, or very large web site... I d'ont talk about XML structure 😞 DW since 2015, I don't remember exactly the date, change something in it's core engine, and serach and replace went out... as I said many, many times to folks @adobe , bugs reported... but bugbase is closed now... Folks @adobe took hands on my machines, bug report was send, and so on... nothing helped... now when I need to digg in large document or large project... Ultra Find or Vim... ... View more