I use QXP, ID et al. I rarely use PS and when I do it is an older version. I mostly use PhotoLine as my image editor of choice. I also mostly use AI as a glorified file converter if/when I need to supply drawings back as an AI file. I prefer to use a more efficient vector editor/creation application for the types of vector drawings/illustrations I do. YMMV. The up-front software costs are one thing. The man-hour costs are on-going up until everyone is up to speed and those costs are more than replacing your current software. But this exact type of thing, the costs of software and man-hours in training/support, is what happened to shops and agencies that switched from a Q-centric work-flow to an ID work-flow once upon a time, too. There are large & small agencies, publishers, etc., that use a Q-centric publishing flow. Somehow it seems to work for them ;^) As an independent, I have done work for agencies, publishers and even for other independents that don't use an Adobe-centric work-flow since the late 1980s. To me it's not a big deal to have feet in different "camps." Because I have always owned my own shop, I haven't had to face this issue as an employee. The best you can do is, without fear and/or emotion attached to it, is to lay out and even-handed review of your current processes, the costs (all the types of costs) associated with the choice management is going to make. Then just dig in and do the work with whatever their decision is. It's all doable. Mike
... View more