Hi, > I think ver 5.7.1 should be made available on cloud You can download the installation executable from their FTP server: ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/lightroom/win/5.x/Lightroom_5_LS11_win_5_7_1.exe or ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/lightroom/mac/5.x/Lightroom_5_LS11_mac_5_7_1.dmg ... View more

I also think that the whole Adobe software installation system is a mess. Too complicated, much too buggy and much too impacted by marketing considerations instead of being merely practical. Adobe, can you imagine how many work hours are lost in this world each time you release a new version of your software just because you cannot deliver a reliable, simple, quick and effective installation system? For most software companies, this is no longer an issue. I'm using a lot of software. Only Adobe make things so difficult and exasperating. ... View more

Actually, for most plugins, there's no need to reinstall. Since PS CC 2015 installs in a new folder and since the installer is leaving alone all the files that did not belong to the initial PS CC 2014 install, one just has to copy the plugins folder from the 2014 folder to the 2015 folder (unless you deleted the 2014 folder too fast). I did this for all my plugins without any problem. However, as mentioned in the ON1 document, the ON1 panels don't work in 2015. You have to use the File | Automate menu. ... View more

Hi, If the above suggested method doesn't work or forces you to uninstall everything (including CC apps), try this: CC Desktop update failing again ... View more

Samoreen wrote: 2. Kill the Coresync.exe process. I should have also mentioned that the CC Desktop app itself should be terminated before trying to delete anything. Just right-click its icon in the system tray and Quit. ... View more

Sheena Kaul wrote: Patrick can you please post a screenshot of the error message? I wrote above : Once the download reaches 100%, the update window closes without any warning No error message at all. The CC Desktop window closes and that's it. ... View more

Hi, For those who don't want to re-install everything, here is the method I'm using each time there's a new update for Adobe CC Desktop. Yes, each time, this is not a new problem. Since I have installed Adobe CC Desktop, each new update fails the very same way: the update is downloaded and when the progress indicator reaches 100%, the window closes without any error message. When re-launching the app, it invites you again to update, same failure again, endless loop. This has been reported again and again but nobody cares. Very frankly, the people at Adobe who are in charge of the development of these installation programs should consider switching to another job. My workaround: - Make sure you close the CC Desktop app (Right-click its icon in the system tray and Quit). - Kill (terminate) the Coresync.exe process by using the Task Manager (Ctrl+Shift+Esc). - Completely delete the C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Creative Cloud folder. Other similar folders may also exist, suffixed with a different version number (especially when a previous update attempt failed). Delete them too. - Navigate to https://creative.adobe.com/products/creative-cloud , download and re-install Adobe CC Desktop. This is what I'm doing for each update and it always worked. Good luck. ... View more

And now that I have painfully installed CC Desktop, I'm trying to install the Photoshop CC and Bridge CC updates. No luck! CC Desktop tells me that the files are corrupt. I'm not alone with this issue, obviously. What a mess! ... View more

Hi, Same problem here with Photoshop CC and Bridge CC. ... View more

Not fixed in 6.1. Are you surprised? ... View more

Thanks Sheena. Could someone definitively fix this issue ? The problem exists for me since I have installed CC Desktop. Each update is a failure. It should be possible, in 2015, to write installation programs that work. Is that so difficult? ... View more

Confirmed on my system. ... View more

emil1369 wrote: can someone who doesn't have a problem please give some feedback as to what kind of performance gains they're seeing? Is the difference significant? Hi, Nobody can answer this question until we get something else than a beta version of LR 6/CC. I don't have this problem but there are too much new problems related to the display (especially when loading an image) to be able to validly comment about the performance enhancements in LR6. For example, when I load an image in the Development module, I can observe a 4-step "process" that was not there in LR5 : 1. The image is sharp but very briefly. 2. The image becomes very blurred. 3. The image becomes less blurry. 4. The image becomes sharp again. This happens even when the 1:1 preview has already been generated and with or without GPU acceleration. The process is just a little bit shorter (1-2 seconds) when the GPU option is enabled. Just wait for the "real" thing. This is the worst x.0 version that I have ever seen for Lightroom. The only thing that can be done for now is stacking up bug reports and wait... ... View more

Thanks Atul, Two remarks though : 1. How do I know which processes should be stopped ? 2. Since the installer knows which processes are conflicting with itself, could the developer be kind enough to display a more informative message ? After two years all of us being bothered with this issue, he/she could have found enough time for fixing this. If the problem is really caused by conflicting processes, why does this installer not behave like any other installer : temporarily stop the installation, inform the user of which processes should be terminated (or offer to kill them itself) and then resume installation ? ... View more

Dave Merchant wrote: The "mark all read" feature is handled by your inbox Streams, not within the forums. Which is the awkwardest way to handle this . Why make it simple when it can be complicated? Any clue about what they are smoking at Jive ? ... View more

Dave Merchant wrote: The bold style in Content > Discussions indicates either a new thread has appeared since your last visit to that Community, or a new reply has been posted to a thread you've previously viewed (within the past month). Sorry but this doesn't work that way. Even if I sign out / sign in, most thread titles remain in bold even if they are not new since my last visit or if no message has been added to the thread. The only way to have a thread title not in bold is to open it. Anyway, a simple "Mark all as read" button is a basic feature that belongs to any decent forum. It should be there. ... View more

Jacob Bugge wrote: If you use the Discussions view, threads with new posts, or editions, are shown in bold. New posts since when ? If I can't mark all threads as read as in any other forum, what means new ? ... View more

Beza wrote: I have been having the same problem, but not only this. When I click "browse in Bridge" under File, instead of getting Bridge, the Adobe Creative Cloud window opens on my desktop! I had this problem too. My solution was to uninstall Bridge and reinstall it. Although the Adobe CC desktop app tells you that Bridge is up-to-date, it is not. PS CC 2014 is aware of this and opens up the CC window to allow you to install the latest version of Bridge. But since the CC desktop app considers that Bridge is already up-to-date, you're entering an endless loop.  Although Bridge might have switched from the "up-to-date" to the "update" state in the CC window after you clicked on "Browse in Bridge" in PS, clicking on "Update" will not update anything. You have to uninstall Bridge first. It's a bug that also hits other apps (like Adobe Extension Manager CC). This 2014 release has not been tested very much, I guess. ... View more

SG... wrote: The 2014 release (15.0.0) will not load any Flash based panels. Now we'd really like to know why. This harsh and unexpected decision (which is apparently not announced in the press reviewer's guide - no press article mentions this) suddenly makes a lot of useful extensions obsolete and nobody will give us any valid justification? By the way (I started another thread about this), the add-ons browser has no way to inform us whether a given extension is CC 2014 compatible. One has to try... and fail most of the time. We need a filter based on this property in the add-ons browser. ... View more

KellyKay2 wrote: Looks like they took it down Samoreen. Yes. Actually, they have removed Flash support in PS extensions. This is a surprising and strange decision which makes a lot of extensions incompatible with PS CS 2014. ... View more

helensotiriadis wrote: same issues -- reinstalled ext.mgr, it's on the latest version, my extensions are listed, but it's grayed out within PS. Hi, Just to be sure : you say your extensions are listed but under which application in the left panel of the Extension Manager ? I have experienced the following problem : CC was telling me that Extension Manager was up-to-date but this was actually not the case. When I launched it, it showed the extensions that I had installed in Photoshop CC. There was no Photoshop CC 2014 entry in the left panel. Is this the case for you? I had to uninstall everything (Exension Manager CC, Bridge CC and Photoshop CC 2014) and re-install in this order : Photoshop CC 2014, Extension Manager CC and then Bridge CC. Then PS CC 2014 was recognized by Extension Manager. ... View more

Same problem here. In the File menu, I can only see Browse in Bridge, not Browse in Minibridge. ... View more

. OK, I'm a little bit reckless. ... View more

Uwe Laubender wrote: What is a bit obscure to me, to say the least, why does the text on the front of the tile is reading "last modified by" followed by name, when in fact the name represents the author of the initial question… It should be reading "Author:" instead of "last modified by"! I guess that a post could be modified by the author himself, an admin or a moderator ? ... View more

This software is the most terrible thing I have seen since the BBS era. Almost nothing to save. Did anybody test it before making the decision to switch to this pitiful piece of code? Please Adobe "upgrade" to the old version asap and consider banning any tool bearing the name "Jive". ... View more

john beardsworth wrote: OK, there's good progress in not being forced to sign in every time, but there's some way to go. We're missing: 1. Number of posts in a thread 2. Indication of most recent contributor to a thread I would add : "Mark forum read". ... View more