pic852.jpg is quite over-saturated and also not sharply focused. ... View more

You said "I've tried contacting you." Please note that the participants in this forum are Contributors. We are not Adobe employees and cannot solve such account problems. You'll just have to wait for Adobe to reply to the message you sent via the Contact Us link on your account. ... View more

PayPal doesn't cause any significant delay - usually 1-2 days for me with no fee. ... View more

I haven't seen this problem reported before- a "zero" limit on a brand new account. If it hasn't reset within a week, contact Adobe via the contact us link in your account page. ... View more

I don't believe that service is offered by Adobe. ... View more

Use the contact us link on your stock account page to resch out to Adobe Stock Contributor Support. ... View more

If this is not the same version you submitted, we cannot say with certainty why it was rejected, but this version is underexposed and would have earned a quality rejection. ... View more

Some times the similars rejections just make no sense at all. I've had photographs rejected for similars when I'm quite sure that the are true unique, both in my portfolio and across the entire database. Edit slightly, wait a while and resubmit. As @daniellei4510 said, if they're rejected again, just move on. You don't want to be accused of spamming the database. ... View more

Someone else reported an image rejected for the same reason just a day or two, and upon inspection it was clear that it had quality issues. So, it could just be a matter of the moderator selecting the wrong rejection code - that happens quite often. ... View more

Unfortunately, many people lack the discernment to identify how crappy these designs are... ... View more

You are not addressing Adobe directly here in this Community; the participants are other Contributors just like you. Reread the Adobe Stock guidelines as well as the rejection message you received and you will learn that Adobe rejects based not only on similars within your own submissions and portfolio, but all other assets in the database.  ... View more

 Can you include a link to your portfolio here? Then we can let you know what is viewable from where we're located. It's possible that, due to the country in which you're located, some assets require additional vetting before they are displayed in your country. ... View more

How big is your portfolio? Are you regularly submitting new content? Is your content in very competitive categories?  ... View more

Are you saying that it was rejected by the Adobe Stock Moderator? What reason was given? I think it's a bit underexposed in the shadows and overexposed in the highlights. ... View more

Due to the Thanksgiving holidays in the U.S., today is only work day 10. You should be paid any day now. ... View more

It's underexposed and poorly composed - you shouldn't have cut off part of the plate. ... View more

Do you have an existing Stock Contributor account? Use the contact us link on that account to reach out to Contributor support. ... View more

Your assumption that Adobe has banned new AI assets is incorrect. They continue to add hundreds of thousands of new AI assets every day. Nevertheless, the algorithm they use to detect similars definitely seems to be flawed and many assets are unfairly rejected. Unfortunately, there's nothing we can do about it except concentrate on submitting only our highest quality, most unique images and hope for the best. ... View more

If you can edit out the quality issues noted above, then you can resubmit it. ... View more

DSC07695.JPG - underexposed DSC07626.JPG - the name "Navy Pier" should have resulted in an IP rejection DSC01513.JPG - DOF is too shallow; since the leaf is the focal point of the image it should have been completely in focus   In order to review sharpness on your images, zoom in at least 100%, and inspect all areas of the frame. Viewing at standard size, particularly on a small monitor, can give you a false sense that the image is sharp.  ... View more

Similars rejections can refer to both how many similars you submit for the same subject as well as how many similar images are already in the database from other Contributors. It's not a perfect process, and if you read some of the many other posts in the forum on this topic, you'll learn that many other Contributors have complained about the flaws in the Moderation process. Unfortunately, there's nothing we as Contributors can do about it. It's the "new normal" here in Adobe Stock. You might have better luck if you only submit one image from a site at a time, and wait a few days to submit the next one.    Adobe definitely prefers a "slow but steady" approach to submissions. I only submit 4-6 on any one day, and spread out my submissions from the same subject or location over multiple batches. I would never consider submitting 50+ assets at one time. ... View more

Perhaps @Contributor1 can assist with your request. ... View more

I think the Moderator chose the wrong rejection reason for the first image. It's quite noisy and should have received a quality rejection; the second image is lacking sharp detail, looks like it was taken with a small sensor camera, possibly a mobile phone. ... View more

25finance01.jpeg - the upper right part of the image is overexposed 25finance02.jpeg - the figure in the front is out of focus, though the other objects immediately surrounding him are not ... View more