Did you attach the model releases? ... View more

The rejections can at times be unreasonable and unfounded. I don't know what criteria Adobe Moderators use to judge such images, but they look good to me! ... View more

I don't remember any of the details precisely, however it's usually in the range of $50 for ~150 images.  ... View more

I usually choose a shutter speed of 1/250 or faster for subjects in motion.  ... View more

01_Caleta Famara_20251202_JB6A8050 copia.jpg - this one is also a bit blurry and noisy  ... View more

I don't think that Missions are issued on any regular schedule. Of course, I only see the Missions to which I'm asked to participate. I've never found any of them lucrative enough to bother with. Tons of work involved for very little compensation. ... View more

Blurry, noisy, halos around the edges and some of the wings don't look like they're attached to the horses. ... View more

When I look at Creative Cloud Pro for either individuals or businesses, Adobe Stock is not listed among the apps that are included. Where did you see that it was included with your subscription? ... View more

Well now we know that you haven't actually read the Adobe Stock Learn & Support Help Pages. You probably should do that before accusing others of being wrong... ... View more

You don't have to believe me - just go to stock.adobe.com and use the filters to determine how many AI and non-AI assets are in the database.  ... View more

yyyy_upscayl_4x_upscayl-standard-4x.png - the image is poorly exposed and poorly composed. You should not upscale photographs, and PNG format is to be used only for images with a transparent background.   Quick snapshots from your phone is not what Adobe is looking for. Have you read all of the Learn & Supppet help pages? They contain a wealth of useful info that will improve your chances of success. ... View more

"AI does NOT dominate sales, it only dominates volume. Confidence level: 80–85%"   This statement is incorrect, and the true AI vs non-AI percentage in the database is easy to verify by a simple query on stock.adobe.com. AI assets are currently 48.1% of the database and growing with a few tenths of a percentage every week. The percentage of undiscovered (I.e. unsold) AI assets is much higher than the unsold non-AI assets. ... View more

My suggestion to submit your images to other agencies was aimed at ensuring that you know that you are NOT exclusive to Adobe and that it is quite okay to diversify across other agencies. Many Adobe Stock Contributors submit their works to multiple agencies. I am also a Getty Images contributor, and there's nothing wrong with my suggestion that you consider diversifying. ... View more

There are Forum Moderators who keep these Forums organized, productive and managed within the forum guidelines as set out by Adobe. The term Moderator is also applied to the image reviewers that are employed by Adobe Stock. These are definitely not the same people. The moderators who volunteer in these forums are not paid Adobe employees, and we have no contact with the Adobe Stock moderators who review images submitted to Adobe Stock for compliance with Adobe's guidelines. Those image Moderators do not visit or respond in this forum. ... View more

Have you ever read the Adobe Stock Contributor Agreement? ... View more

9873 is underexposed, the DOF is too shallow, and there is chromatic aberration. ... View more

General composition is listed as a potential quality issue.  ... View more

You're welcome. Glad to be of assistance. ... View more

There are 2 sources of "similars" rejections - those within your own account and those across the entire database. Submitting too many similars in your own account is forbidden by the guidelines (read them again if you're uncertain), and can result in account suspension. Similars across the entire database means that Adobe just has too many of that type of image already and doesn't want to flood Buyers with even more. Backgrounds are definitely in that category. Searching for the keyword "background" nets more than 31 million images. You can search the database yourself to see how many backgrounds exist to the ones you're considering uploading. It is believed that such rejections don't harm your account in any way, but they do waste a lot of your time.   None of us knows how Adobe determines if submissions are similar to others in the database. Some think that it largely relies on keywords. I submit only real photographs of real places, and I know for a fact that some of my "similars" rejections are unwarranted, as they are truly unique in the database. Unfortunately, there's not much we can do about it. Sometimes I re-edit an image and alter the keywords a bit and resubmit. If it's not accepted in the second attempt, I just move on. ... View more

The intentional blur here probably would not have caused a rejection. The image overall is underexposed in the shadows, and that's likely to be the reason.  ... View more

Did you read any of the above posts? A seasonal slowdown is completely predictable and is nothing to panic about. Sales will return to normal levels soon. ... View more

Was your asset rejected by Adobe Stock? If so, for what reason? ... View more

The holiday season always results in depressed sales. Many companies are closed for the entire week, and won't return to work in full force until after January 1st, possibly as late as January 5th. ... View more

I don't think any of us in the Contributor community knows whether or how often Adobe reviews existing accounts to determine whether the Contributor has previously been banned. We DO know that the first payout request, and often subsequent payout requests, can trigger an account review which could result in a temporary, or even permanent, account suspension. ... View more

You said in your original post that there was an error when you try to use the Contact Us link. These screenprints do NOT indicate that there is an error. ... View more