dsev1
Participant
dsev1
Participant
Activity
‎Dec 29, 2024
10:45 AM
Every time I open my InDesign file, it says that fonts are missing. However, I have all the font files and have gone through the process of "replacing" all the fonts with the same fonts that the programs says is missing. Even with saving, this never saves the linking of the fonts, so the error message for missing fonts always appears. Is there a way to permanently embed the fonts in InDesign? If so, how? Thanks!
... View more
‎Mar 26, 2021
05:25 AM
Thank you! That seemed to fix it by clicking the "Toggle Gradient Transparency" button.
... View more
‎Mar 25, 2021
05:54 PM
All, Adobe Tech Support got back to me today. They said the gradient tool would not work properly due to insufficient video RAM in my computer. Apparently, you need at least 2 GB of video RAM for Photoshop 2021, while mine was much lower. Very odd the items that still work and random items that don't work due to this. Anyway, that's their official position, and I'd thought I'd pass it along. Thanks for all your input and help!
... View more
‎Mar 25, 2021
02:20 PM
No, unfortunately, it has the same problem on pixel data. Adobe tech support is looking into it now.
... View more
‎Mar 25, 2021
10:06 AM
Opacity is 0%. Thanks.
... View more
‎Mar 25, 2021
06:28 AM
I'm not sure what is meant by 'layer mask settings.' I can go into 'Select & Mask' and adjust those settings, but I don't see 'density' in there. Thanks.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
01:09 PM
Thanks, So, yes, I have tried 'Black to Transparent,' with blending modes normal, but it just filled my entire mask with black. It's very strange.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
11:47 AM
Side note: I just asked someone else to check on their gradient tool's behaviors, and they have the same exact problem as me. We never knew the gradient tool was supposed to behave the other way, as you all have known. So, this problem must be rooted beyond just my computer.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
11:45 AM
Thanks. Just tried the grouping of layers and testing if the problem persists on masks of groups---The answer is Yes, the problem is still happening. I am using Win 10 via bootcamp (on a MBP).
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
10:57 AM
I called Adobe Tech Support and showed them the issue remotely. They said that they would have to advance the case, so I'll wait on that. Side note, the workaround that I came up with for this---albeit extremely inefficient---is that you can repeatedly create grouped layers and then create a mask for each new group and then use the gradient tool independently on each one with no issue. So, you end up with several "nested groups." Not ideal but it works.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
10:05 AM
Thank you. There was no film cut. I also thought it was odd that 'Black to Transparent' created an entirely blacked-out mask. I only went into the Gradient Editor to demonstrate that I was indeed set to 'Black to Transparent.' I had already click the button for it, so there was no need to repeat this. I just tried it again with Black to Transparent and had same results. I have reset Photoshop, but this did not correct the issue. I don't know how to "reload standard gradients," but I have reset the gradient tool, but with no success in remedying this issue. Thanks.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
09:05 AM
Yes, I tried Normal and Multiply.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
09:04 AM
Thank you. I have tried resetting the tool and resetting Photoshop preferences. Honestly, I've been using Photoshop for about 15 years, and the gradient tool always behaved this way, so I thought that was standard behavior for the gradient tool until I saw the tutorial video.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
08:05 AM
1 Upvote
In this screen recording video, you'll be able to see me trying both Black to White and Black to Transparent for the Gradient tool (in the mask of the image). You'll see that it's not additive, but rather each new stroke wipes out the prior one. (Prior to this, I did try resetting the tool as well.) (This forum says that I do not have permission to upload a video, so I am posting a download link from my google drive. Thanks) gradient problem1.mp4
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:48 AM
Ok, I'll have to record a video and upload it. I don't think I lost any default gradients. I believe the gradient tool is either acting funny or I am doing something wrong.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:46 AM
Thank you. yes, I had also tried multiply And even blending options for this.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:36 AM
I tried testing with both Black to White and Black to transparent and still have bad results, unfortunately.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:35 AM
Just to be clear, I tried testing with both Black to White and Black to transparent and still have bad results, unfortunately.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:33 AM
I tried testing with both Black to White and Black to transparent and still have bad results, unfortunately.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:32 AM
Interesting. Mine doesn't seem to behave in this way. Whatever is laid down in the prior gradient tool stroke disappears and only the new gradient tool stroke results seem to present themselves.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:30 AM
I tried holding shift, but it only constrains the stroke to be straight. I also tried Alt/Option and Cmd/Cntrl. but no luck.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
06:07 AM
Thank you. However, this is not the issue. In the video, he is able to almost 'paint' like with a brush with the gradient tool, and it continues to add black to the mask. Conversely, for me, for every stroke of the gradient tool, it eliminates the prior gradient in the mask and starts fresh. There is nothing additive. Nothing builds upon the prior gradient tool stroke. It's all or nothing.
... View more
‎Mar 24, 2021
05:54 AM
I've posted an example screenshot of the gradient to which I am referring. I have used blending modes as well exercise from the tutorial video but for other uses in the task. I would like to know why the person in the tutorial video has a gradient tool that is behaving differently than mine. Thanks.
... View more
‎Mar 23, 2021
04:11 PM
When I use the gradient tool, it affects the layer, and if I am unhappy with its results, I just UNDO and then try again. It is basically a "one shot deal" ... love it or hate it. However, in this YouTube tutorial (5:25 to 6 min.), the gradient tool in the mask seems to be ADDITIVE, like he keeps adding to what is being masked. https://youtu.be/oZr378NyOKM?list=PLHRSsMUaMQK3CeE_8Ayg36ix01Zgh9teI&t=325 When I try this, after one gradient tool stroke, it completely annihilates any prior masking and creates something from scratch. And the same for each successive gradient tool stroke. So how is he able to make it ADDITIVE? Please help! Thank you!!
... View more
‎Mar 08, 2021
12:06 AM
1 Upvote
Thank you!
... View more
‎Mar 07, 2021
06:10 PM
In Quick Mask Mode, what is the difference between the: Cmd+I: (this seems to invert whatever area is RED) vs. Cmd+Shift+ I (this seems to invert whatever is selected by the marching ants). I thought the red area always represented the area to be masked and so, this would be the same as the marching ants. Is the Cmd+Shift+ I just a special temporary manipulation of the marching ants?---because once I exist Quick Mask, those additional marching ants added in Quick Mask disappear. Thanks!
... View more
‎Jan 01, 2021
09:01 PM
Thanks to both Jane and Jeff! I wasn't able to exactly replicate the steps from the video tutorial, but I used a bit from both of your advice. The following seemed to work: 1. As in the tutorial, I filled the upper shape with red and the lower shape with white. 2. While on same "path layer," lower white shape was set to Subtract Front, while the upper red shape was set to Intersect Shape Area. 3. Vector Mask, while red upper shape's layer is selected. 4. View from Paths tab... 5. White lower shape's layer hidden to show that only the upper portion of the red top shape remains. I'm not sure how the person who made the tutorial was able to get around this extra step of setting the paths to two different path operations. Thanks so much!
... View more
‎Jan 01, 2021
10:29 AM
Oh, sure, Sorry for the confusion. The path created for the red lining was the "wrong" shape to then be able to apply certain fx like bevel/emboss to make it look like the lining was rolling back into the shoe interior (because the path was just a rough over-sized shape). (This will make more sense in the video.) I've posted a link to a short clip of the tutorial here. Unfortunately, it was a tutorial that I had to pay for and download, so I want to be careful only to post a bit. Sorry there is a bit of background noise Thanks! Video link https://youtu.be/THUqdb2NqhE
... View more
‎Jan 01, 2021
08:09 AM
I was watching an excellent tutorial on rendering when they used 2 overlapping paths to then do a vector mask, resulting in only a portion remaining visible. One path outlined the white "upper" of a sneaker. The other path outlined the interior red lining of the sneaker. These paths overlapped, as when they drew the paths of the lining, they purposely made them overlap, as the lining would be hidden on a layer below. Using a test of two basic overlapping paths, I tried every path operation possible with a vector mask, and I still cannot get the desired result, that they did in the tutorial. It would be great if someone could help shed some light on this. (PDF attached) Thanks!
... View more