I bit changed the spellchek suggestions, the html source code of my message
<p>So, I did an extended test and I concluded that my suspicion was wrong and LrC works correctly or works as before. Camera RAW version also doesn't influence the image quality, either on rendering or preview.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Anyway I started to get a little blurry image more often than before, but I should look for this in other possible sources. Inclusive one of the sources can be myself too.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I should explain a bit why I started to suspect LrC or Camera Raw plugin.</p>
<p>What I found is that, for example, the LrC good enough to resolve raw data for .ORF files when the subject and light conditions are contrast enough. In more flat conditions the image looks more washed and harder to distinct the details.</p>
<p>In comparison with original software Olympus Workspace, where the same image looks cleaner from more points of view: sharp, colours, ... . Like @ssprengel also wrote and present a example, by adjusting the sharpening can be achieved close enough results with image from Olympus Workspace, but this adds additional noise. By resolving the noise, image looks more plastic. I'm still learning the LrC, but at the moment I didn't achieve close enough results as Olympus Workspace for "trouble" images.</p>
<p>A sample of images:</p>
<p><li-image width="999" height="999" alt="Scorpan5FBD_0-1620774346156.png" align="inline" id="246039i9D4D9A5ACE093BA6" size="large" resized="false" sourceType="new"></li-image></p>
<p>Snapshots from LrC, all snapshots zoomed to 100%, all images was taken with camera mounted on tripod, shutter with 2 seconds delay, image stabilization on, focal length 150mm on MFT (300mm on 35mm sensor equivalent), distance to the subject is estimated to about 1km.</p>
<p>Image A - is when the light condition was contrast enough, direct sunlight at angle about 60 degree. Details about sharpening is "Amount: 0". Exposition info: ISO 200, 1/1000, F2.8. Focus - manual.</p>
<p>Image B - is when the light condition was flat, a dense cloud covered the sun. Details about sharpening is "Amount: 0". Exposition info: ISO 200, 1/1000, F2.8. Focus - manual (was the same as image A, because image was taken <span class="VIiyi"><span class="JLqJ4b ChMk0b" data-language-for-alternatives="en" data-language-to-translate-into="ro" data-phrase-index="0"><span>sequentially</span></span></span> ).</p>
<p>Image C - is the same as B, but with added sharpening: Amount - 40; Radius: 1.0; Detail - 25; Masking - 35</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For comparison the similar snapshots from Olympus Workspace</p>
<p><li-image width="999" height="999" alt="Scorpan5FBD_1-1620775922281.png" align="inline" id="246042iE2D9483D4219BB02" size="large" resized="false" sourceType="new"></li-image></p>
<p>A, B, C images are the same A, B, C described in LrC snapshots (the same .ORF files). The zoom is 1:1.</p>
<p>Image A - is the same Image A described in LrC snapshots</p>
<p>Image B - is the same Image B described in LrC snapshots</p>
<p>Image C - is the same Image C described in LrC snapshots, with sharpening adjustments: Color grading - AUTO, Sharpness - +0.8</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Looks that confused me the images were taken in flat light conditions, where in LrC looks not good enough by default. But adjusting the details of the images can be changed to be at some acceptable conditions. Where the original raw processing software by default (without any adjustments) looks more acceptable from the beginning.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks very much to all who tried to help me to understand and to resolve my issue. I didn't expected that I will get so quick response from issue, so I appreciate a lot for so quick response.</p>
<p>Again, thanks to all who tried to help and to guide me through my issue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I will close the case, as my issue looks like it is not related to the Adobe Workflow.</p>
Still confused and looking for the errors.
10
Replies
AdChoices