Now I purchased the new 24-105RF and will now do some testing to make sure it's not caused by the camera, which was developed less than a year ago. I've noticed some blurry photos taken with the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 II with the adapter. This had never happened to me before with the Canon 6D MII. By @maria graziab50418227 The RF will probably do better results, however, the adapter should also work quite well, especially with canon lenses. Is your new lens also f4L? With third party lenses I could expect issues, as they may need a firmware update. If you used microsdjustments on your 6D, you may indeed have an issue with the lens. But again: with a mirrorless camera, where the sharpness is measured on the sensor, there should be no issue with sharpness. However, if you shoot a moving object with single focus, you may have an issue, as the subject may move slightly out of focus, the moment you press the shooting button.   It may be worth to ask the question in a Canon forum. ... View more

si peu constructif ce n'est pas la peine merci bien    By @arthur_8080 C'est très constructif, comme le lien montre la concurrence à battre.  ... View more

L'image serait beaucoup mieux avec la bould en avant plan, sans autres éléments obstruant la vue. Le message n'est pas pleinement visible et les lumières attirent trop l'attention. De plus, le reflet sur la balle est trop intense.    (Est ce que le refus était sur la qualité, ou autre chose?) ... View more

As contributors submit more and more assets over time - often across many categories - it becomes increasingly difficult to remember every previously submitted image. In real practice, it seems quite possible to unintentionally upload images that are somewhat similar to older submissions, particularly with abstract backgrounds, minimal concepts, or variations in composition, angle, or color.   In such cases, contributors are not deliberately trying to flood their own portfolio with similars, but may simply overlook past submissions due to human limitations.   Since Adobe Stock already has reviewers and automated systems that can detect similar content, I would expect these tools to act as a natural filter when contributors unintentionally submit overlapping images. This makes me a bit unclear about why account suspension is mentioned as a potential consequence, especially when there is no intent to abuse the system.   This situation can be somewhat concerning for contributors with large portfolios, as it creates anxiety that honest mistakes or forgetfulness could eventually be interpreted as a violation, even when the contributor is genuinely trying to avoid submitting similars.   I’d appreciate any clarification on how Adobe differentiates between intentional over-submission of similars and unintentional overlap that can occur over time.   Thank you for your time. By @suyoko_8613 It's your responsibility to detect such assets that are too similar to your portfolio. If you are submitting a lot of "similar" assets, and we have seen very bad examples of such submissions, then you are risking account suspension. It won't happen when you have submitted 5 similar assets, when the rule says 3 variations only. It's more about having much more similar assets, and customers start to complain about that. ... View more

As for your sales: What are low sales? I would guess that from a good portfolio, about 10% of the assets generate sales, and about 1 to 2% generate a lot of sales. All that is in relation with the competition, both in numbers and quality. If a search does not bring you on the three first screens, it is quite improbable, but not impossible that they will make a sale. When they make a sale, there is a certain probability that there will be a follow up sale. And sometimes very old assets generate a first sale, and then they generate regularily sales. That's how it works with my portfolio. ... View more

That's normal for your region and will happen with most of my pictures too, if I set my region to yours. It does not disadvantage you, it's just a bit weird, as you do not see the asset. But be assured: as soon as it is approved, it is in the database, and open for sales. And when it generates a lot of sales, it will be vetted again and approved for your region too. ... View more

What is a slight AI look under close inspection? That sounds like generative AI defects! ... View more

It's quite "hidden" near the original filename. ... View more

Les partenaires accèdent la base de donnée d'Adobe stock via l'API. Au moment ou quelq'un laisse imprimer un poster avec ta photo, tu fais une vente.  ... View more

All in all, I would suggest the lens is the main problem. Did you use the kit lens that came with the camera? The kit lens combo isn't always that good and can indeed give results like this. I've had this experience myself, and as a result, can often recognise the result that it gives. Also, in all the samples you provided, the 'look' of the photo is the same, which indicates to me the quality of the lens. This may or may not be a factor, but do consider the lens. If it is a lens that came with the camera, take a look at 3rd party lenses from Tamron, Sigma, and Tokina, for example. By @Ricky336 It's an EF-mount lens in the L series from Canon: As mirrorless cameras are measuring the focus on the sensor, it is very improbable that there is a lens issue as there where with DSLR cameras and microadjustments. As not all lenses are equal, and this is the kit lens for a Canon EOS 5/6D, it's probably not the best lens they offer, but it is not of the cheap type, they use in the low end cameras. It still may be the issue, as the adapter ring takes it's toll, and the lens is not really build for mirror less cameras.   My guess is that the autofocus setting is to one shot, which is wrong for moving subjects. Even a short delay may bring the subject out of focus. A different assumption would be camera shake, but the stabilization on these cameras is amazingly good. But I have no experience with the adapter ring for EF lenses. It may be that the stabalization is handicaped against RF lenses.   Just for reference, I would refer @maria graziab50418227 to this video, which I found quite good for explaining the AF settings and tips on customization of the camera. As it is for wildlife photography, you need sometimes, however, to interpret the settings. https://youtu.be/CDZoXrBdyFo   ... View more

OUI. Pour des raisons de qualité ! ... View more

@gargiulo , That are very interesting and important information. I always download from the image view. That may explain that it works with me... 😉   Edit: Having now tested the system from the search screen: it still works for me.  ... View more

What OS are you using? What browser are you using? Did you check the usual remedies: Deleting cache, deleting cookies, strting the browser without extensions or add-ons, changing the browser, changing the computer (laptop, desktop, tablet, cell phone)? ... View more

Sorry, typo, should be "It started to work..." No difference with and without extensions, Safari has identical list of extensions in my case. By @alcruz Chrome and Safari are built using different kits, so there may be differences. My guess, based on entries here is that it concerns macOS users. And as you can't save to the library, a different guess is that it has to do something with rights, as the library is cached on your system in a special, normally hidden directory.    Trying without extentions and add ons is always useful to exclude any interference with some add ons, like add blockers or similar.  Even if they are the same on both browsers, they may still be differently configured. The main browser is generally tightly closed, where browsers used only for testing or occasionally, are generally more open (as you do not spend that much time with them, and suspicious links are rarely followed on them, that is OK, if used carefully).   Sorry for not being of more help. As I'm not a macOS user, I can't do testing. And my iPad, even if similar that macOS is running a different, much more closed OS. ... View more

Aber es wird einem bei Premium Bildern bestätigt, was das Bild kostet, und man muss dann den Kauf genehmigen. Spätestens  da muss man einen Rückzieher machen.    Eventuell kann @Liza5C0C hier weiter helfen. ... View more

@alcruz , Sorry, your message is confusing me.   It works now for you when you are using Safari, but not with Chrome? Start Chrome without extentions, then try. ... View more

@Marijke22318168vezi ,   I tagged Contributor1 who will initiate the checking.  ... View more

@daniellei4510 ,   You can check the upload dates by checking your file IDs and comparing them to these here.  ... View more

  ich habe derzeit Probleme beim einreichen von Stockfotos. Ich versehe die mit Beschreibung und Keywords und lade diese per FTP hoch. So wie das schon mit tausenden von Fots in den letzten Jahren gemacht habe. By @nue_pkw Wen oder was lädst Du mit FTP hoch? Überprüfe Deine CSV Datei auf Fehler.      Ich habe das schon mit Safari und Firefox getestet. By @nue_pkw Nutze FileZilla. ... View more

New camera with higher resolution? That means that you need to shoot at a higher exposure speed to compensate for movement of the camera and subject. There may also be a problem with the setting, when you choose the wrong focus technique. You should follow the subject, if the subject moves. ... View more

The asset is a bit grainy and the transparent screen looks a bit fake.  ... View more

The moonshot is underexposed. You should modify the moon's exposure. I think you have masked the moon, but it is not perfect, so when I modify the exposure, I get a kind of ugly halo around the moon.  The sunshot is underexposed, too. And it has indeed grain and colour banding. The deep sky image is also having exposure issues, you should modify the blacks and the highlights and the whites. You could start with adding some contrast and structure.    I think you could address the issues, by carefully editing and masking what needs to stay untouched. Your pictures are quite impressive.   As a side note: the categories are useless. They have been grandfathered from Fotolia, but there is absolutly no discernable use of those.  ... View more