That happens. You have two choices: 1) you continue waiting forn them to get moderated, or 2) you delete (some of them) and resubmit. Some pretend that chances are higher that they get moderated if you change the filename. ... View more

You will see next month. If your age has been recorded correctly, it should work. ... View more

You're welcome. ... View more

   Give an idea of ​​the best method to find low nice in Adobe Stroke. By @Mohammad Sadequzzaman What do you wan't to knkow? Use your imagination to find a niche. And especially: do not tell anyone what it is and how you found it. ... View more

You need to submit your file here. The refusal reason is quatity issues, the rest of the message is not targeted to your asset. ... View more

 Maybe the AI flood is jamming up the queues. By @pault44520035 Yes. ... View more

A human reviewer is always involved. I'm not sure that you are allowed to use Canva icons in Adobe stock assets. ... View more

I suspect AI contributors are being hit especially hard. By @daniellei4510 I suspect that it is in the context of masses. No photographer ever contributed 3000 assets in a row. At least not after they used up their stock. If you massively contribute, you will be hit massively by this, may be also because most generative AI contributors do not bring a lot of variation into their creative prompting. ... View more

Submit again, after a while. ... View more

Thanks for this info.  ... View more

All these images were created with AI technology. By @Dreamy_Songbird5E23 And what does that mean? ... View more

My attempt to talk to the contributor support ended with their mention that they have no interactions with moderator team, and all they could recommend was to share regrets in this forum. By @ivank11134774 Sharing regrets here is good for releasing pressure, but as basically no one from Adobe reads this (may be one or two read some of this), it's worth what it is worth. As noone knows currently a winning strategy, we are all non-swimmers in the middle of the ocean. ... View more

Why shouldn't be there verities and different styles of same content so thebuyer can have more options to select from.. By @Neo-Arts There are. But some contributors submitted and got accepted hundreds of basically the same assets. Now we have to live with this. ... View more

It's Adobe's choice to refuse all of your assets, it's your choice to prioritize other databases. We all keep somehow Adobe, because we are making more money here than elsewhere. 🥳 ... View more

And a few days ago some of my images from 3 years ago were brought down because of intelectual property issue... It's my property! I'm in rage. By @Sana Dot That's a different issue. The assets had some issue, or they would not have been removed. But you were not accused of stealing, or you would have been blocked. IP is sometimes very difficult to understand. I had two assets that I needed to edit multiple times, before I finally did hit the IP issue.  ... View more

. Adobe has it's own moderation team and own rules. By @Abambo Well, claiming that sounds rather overconfident. Just a few years ago, outsourcing that so-called “moderation” to third-party firms in third countries was absolutely normal and economically efficient. And I don’t think much has changed now By @AlexBond Well, if Adobe hires moderators, the are part of Adobe's moderation team, not part of Shutterstocks moderation team. And the Adobe moderation was quite good and efficient, before they accepted generative AI submissions. Adobe completely failed in that. But not because moderators refused good assets, but because they accepted obviously flawed assets. And there is still a double standard. Photgraphies are checked more stringently than generative AI.    I never had an issue with the quality refusals, as they were very mostly OK. With the similar refusals, however, Adobe has introduced a tool that returns results, that we probably all can agree upon, are random and flawed. No single contributor, however, can determine how accurate or flawed the tool is, as we do have no idea, what other contributors get refused. Not all refusals land here. ... View more

@Geoff79 ,   Sure. Fact is that Adobe thinks that their tool works good enough (if not perfectly) and that really none of the contributors here would agree.  ... View more

. This way I think is very random. By @wik36571009stwf We can agree on this. Check some of the threads, and you will read that we all are buffeled at this refusals. And at the inconsistencies of them. ... View more

I wouldn't like to sit in your plane, however. My guess is that it would fall from the sky quite soon. Well, theoretically, it could not take off. 😉 Your first contains artefacts and should have been refused.  ... View more

The fist time you did submit 7 similar assets. The second time you did submit only 2 similar assets. That may make a difference.    We do not know, how Adobe's tool to detect similar assets works, it may well be that if you submit such series, that the results of the tool get amplified, as you specifically did submit similars.  ... View more

Did you create all of the asset manually, or did you use some icons available in Canva for creating this? ... View more

What Adobe's form? You should be more precise with what you did try to do.    You need to attach a property release, if Adobe moderators think that the asset is generative AI. We really soon need a check mark to mark the assets as non generative AI. 😉    The 48 assets still pending may well pass. You never know... ... View more

E44A0561 is not a skyline, but shows a specific modern building. You will need a property release for that one.  E44A0531: the same is true for this one. In addition there is an advert visible on the left, and the group of people may be considered as recognizable. As they are a group, individuals in that group may recognize themselves as part of that group. E44A0543: this too, is not exactly a skyline. A boy's t-shirt and a woman's bag have logos on them.  E44A0540: check the posters on the building to the right and a man's t-shirt. In addition, again, the picture would not be considered as a skyline, so property releases may be necessary.   ... View more

UPD I've succesfully added a phone number to the account. Seems like it was some tech glitch. So please try again - maybe you can add it too now! By @lars_mode Interesting. Did support tell you about this, or did you just not stop entering your phone number? ... View more

You are right but still in recent upload someone uploaded onion on white background and it has approved. It should fall in similar content rejection. I am uploading unique content and it is getting rejected as similar content . By @theartcreatore We all experience this issue, and no one has currently a solution. Adobe is convinced that they are doing a good job, so be prepared to live with this refusal in the future. ... View more

Well, your wording was confusing not only to me, but also to others, when I read the comments here correctly. If you check the forum here, you will find multiple threads on the "similar rejection" issue. And no thread will provide you with a set of instructions on how best to avoid this situation. We are all confused about how this refusal gets triggered. ... View more

The similar refusal is unrelated to the generative AI refusal. Sometimes, moderators have a hard time to check assets and finding out if an asset is generative AI or not. If your asset gets falsly flagged, you need to submit a property release, where you state that the asset is of your own creative making and that no generative AI has been involved.    This does not guarantee that the asset will pass, however, as there may also be some wuality issues, or you may get hit by this annoying "similar assets" refusal.    BTW: this is not Adobe team or Adobe contributor support, but this forum is exclusively driven by fellow contributors. ... View more

You simply can't unlicense assets. As the asset is a premium asset, that costs more than one credit, you got asked for confirmation and you confirmed the licensing. Normally licensing operations are not refundable.   May be @Liza5C0C or @Riya123 may help here. ... View more

Well, there was a time before Adobe used that tool of theirs and there is the time after. Adobe is persuaded, that their method is working as designed. They may tweak some parameters, but the overall number one refisal reason today is probably this similar thing.   And we have absolutely no idea how to cope with that, as even those who are very careful not to submit any duplicates of anything get hit by this refusal. ... View more

8.png is not an oinion. And it is childish to assume that if one asset from a different contributor has been accepted, your asset also needs to get accepted. To the contrary: the similar rejection explicitly says that there are similar assets in the database.  ... View more