Is there any tool or software to check these types of quality errors?   By @kazi Rakibul30439051t0qe I use my eyes! ... View more

I think so. But that does not necessarily to be what the moderator thought.  ... View more

It takes Adobe normally more than two days to respond to your request for more information.    If your account has been suspended, there is nothing that this community of peers can do for you. You will need to contact Adobe contributor support via the link at “Contact us”. Adobe will answer via e-mail, so watch your spam folder. The answer may take some time, depending on the workload of contributor support and the complexity of the investigation. So be patient and do not spam the contributor support. ... View more

You're welcome. ... View more

Please let me know if I answered your question. If not, it would be good if you rephrase your question. Best wishes Jacquelin By @jacquelingphoto2017 OP is missing this information on his upload screen:    ... View more

SFTP is being phased out. If you do not have the access data anymore, you will not be able to use SFTP.  ... View more

, rate it , and ask anything wihtout hesitation , i will honeslty reply you By @NextZenZubayer Congratulations. When the asset has been accepted, there is nothing more to do for us. And we won't for sure not check an image on a screenshot, showing only a thumbnail of the asset.   I suppose you will get more acceptences. If not, you will need to post one or two images as submitted (same quality, size, no modifications). ... View more

Attach the asset that you submit. Don't forget to state that it is a 3D render from Cinema4D.    It may well be that the refusal reason is a quality issue. But you can't know, without resubmitting. (Well, you could check the asset at 100% for rendering errors.) ... View more

ChatGpt, where you can create tagging bots, sometimes adds such words as volkswagen, vw, pixar, NASA, Nike, adidas and some others. Imstocker, to a lesser extent, but sometimes also sneaks in some. Maybe you have not used these programs for tagging and you are talking without knowing, or you are talking about the automatic taggers of Adobe's own web. It is clear that we as contributors have the obligation to review them, but from time to time some of them slip through. I recommend that you do not speak without knowing if you are going to question the veracity of what someone else says because it can lead to error to others who read this thread. By @emilio_0600 You should be aware that Adobe also has an autotagger (Sensei, also claiming to be AI supported), and that one, even if you need to review the tags, does not introduce protected keywords. So @Jill_C was entirely correct in assuming you would refer to Sensei, as this is about Adobe stock on an Adobe sponsored forum. So, she is “speaking with knowing”, but you were not precise enough with the information you gave out.   You are responsible for what you post, even if it gets accepted, and you can get banned for this, even if the moderators let it slip through. ... View more

You're welcome. ... View more

Repeating the stock text does not help anyone. We all have enough such rejections to know what is written down. If you need help in identifying the issues, you need to post your asset in the same quality as submitted together with the refusal reason header (in your case “Quality Issues”). ... View more

No, year per year, Adobe reconsiders and changes the conditions (or keeps them the same!). You need to wait for the new announcement. ... View more

Too small to check really for errors. However, as a general tip: check your assets at 100%and look for rendering errors (eyes, hands, the presents, the tree). There are enough possibilities where generative AI can go wrong. ... View more

You're welcome.   ... View more

Your asset exposes more than one error, this is probably the worst: And it is present in multiple places:                  In addition: the books are poorly rendered: The flowers are blurry and not very realistic : The AI has no clue about what is foreground (the flowers) and what is background (the stores): Blurry textures or not blurry, that's the question: You need to check your assets at 100%, and you need to correct the errors you see. If you can't correct them, do not submit.   And yes, I agree with @daniellei4510 that the glass is poorly rendered. Maybe you can explain what this is? ... View more

Photos: if your assets look as being taken with a camera, use the “photo” category. Illustrations: Even if the assets look like a picture taken with a camera, as soon as you add some abstract elements, use illustration as a category.   So a toddler with nice hair should be a photo, the same toddler with flowers instead of hair would be an illustration. ... View more

Thank you, how can I ask Adobe directly? By @Deris_Septian6844 Read the documentation. You will need to find the answers there. And no, you do not need to ask Adobe directly. Submit one, and get it approved or not. Submit the next one etc. Stop as soon as you got 4 refusals in a row or (if they accept one or the other), stop when you get the first "similar" refusal.   If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html ... View more

That is one possible reason. When looking at your assets, I did not find them to be high quality. Spending more time with it, I would probably detect more issues. ... View more

I'm contributing photography and any ratio that works for the asset is good for sales.  ... View more

Seen at 100%: it's blurred. In addition, it's highly “underexposed”: even for a darker object, the image should contain whites (far right) and highlights (right)  in the histogram. Even some mid-tones (exposure in the Adobe Camera Raw filter) are missing. ... View more

They look like poorly vectorized assets.   Checking at 100% you see these smudged surfaces and lines:   ... View more

would you recommend focusing exclusively on 3:2 and 16:9 formats for Adobe Stock submissions? By @Narendra75 No. It doesn't matter at the end of the day. But landscape assets compete well in the image jungle. ... View more

Do what is good for your picture. You did not tell us, but I assume you are a generative AI contributor. It is probably best to have some kind of landscape asset, with some room around the main subject to crop the asset to the needed format. ... View more

You're welcome.   If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html ... View more

The asset has washed out colours — the colours should have a more natural look The hands are weird   The pattern on the hat is bad and out of focus (soft)   The tablet is not straight. As a man-made object, this needs to be drawn, like with a ruler. ... View more

You can upload as many as you want, but you are limited to submitting to the moderation queue. And no, per se, submitting to the moderation queue is not considered as spam, but if the assets are too similar, that will be spam. And spam assets start with the fourth similar image but to have consequences for account blocking, you need to submit more similar images. There is no published threshold, but I suppose it is nearer to 50 assets than 5,000 assets.   As for spam, you will need to study this carefully, as it describes very well, what spam is: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/similar-vs-spamming.html   So now to your 80k assets. You say that you worked for months, so let's assume that's 6 months. 6 months is 183 days, that's 4,392 hours, but you have to sleep, eat, do other things, let's deduct 8 hours per day for that.  That leaves you around 2,928 hours of work, or 175,680 minutes. That leaves exactly 2 minutes 12 seconds to check each asset for errors and similarity. I doubt that that is possible. So, what lets you think that your assets are high quality?   (As a side note: I know of a contributor with only 60,000 assets who got blocked, because of some violation of the terms. Walking through all those assets again, to see what assets were in violation, is an impossible task.) ... View more

Besides the fact that this smells fraudulent, sales are recorded instantly. You get an e-mail once a day with a summary of your sales, if there were any.    You don't generate sales for downloading the preview, however. ... View more