Interesting. I assume there are no,other images in the database. I might take anither look at some of my rejects to see if a keyword re-org would be worthwhile. ... View more

The robot's right hand is a mess and doesn't match the other hand. And as @daniellei4510  said, there are many, many robots already in the database. ... View more

This one has chromatic aberration which is easy to fix in LRC: ... View more

Interesting - I haven't noticed that these colors are trending... ... View more

Exactly. How can an agency demand that a model remove all of her past work from the public domain? That would require her to undo contracts with anyone she has previously worked for her, which seems like a very unrealistic ask. ... View more

This appears to be a low resolution cell phone snapshot due to the lack of sharp detail. It's underexposed, and would require a model release due to the recognizable person in the frame. ... View more

You have a lot of seasonal / holiday content which is now obsolete. Keep building your portfolio steadily with unique content. AI assets now constitute nearly half of all assets in the Adobe stock database, and it gets harder and harder to find unique niches, but that is what you have to do.  ... View more

What were the terms of the model release she signed? Did she grant you perpetual use? ... View more

The background is quite noisy in this one.20240319_172543A.jpeg   ... View more

I'm sure that the Adobe personnel making the account suspension decisions know nothing about which Adobe products you use and for how long! ... View more

Nothing announced yet, ... View more

Contributor Bonus. You can read about it by clicking on the Royalties link at the bottom of your Dashboard page. Nothing has been announced yet. ... View more

In this image you've got a sensor spot in the sky as well as some artifacts. The shadows are also underexposed and there is some chromatic aberration. This is exactly why moderators don't provide more detail as to the flaws they see before rejecting an image - there can be numerous reasons, and it just takes too long to list all of them. ... View more

Whether or not Adobe accepts IE images is highly subjective. I've had 1 from a series accepted (interior scenes from a State Capitol building), and 1 rejected... ... View more

Good luck in your adobe stock journey !   ... View more

The first image is underexposed in the shadows and overexposed in the highlights. The second image is overexposed and not well composed. The verticals shouldn't be leaning. The children in the fourth image are definitely recognizable by their parents, and you would need model releases for each person in this frame. DOF is too shallow in the next image, and the final image was obviously taken in someone's shop, so you would need a property release from the owner.   Shallow DOF should be employed carefully in stock images. It's okay to blur out a background to draw attention to the subject, but in general if parts of the main subject are also too blurry, Adobe will reject it.         ... View more

If you are an Adobe Stock Contributor, you can request your 1099 statement here: InvoiceInfo - 1099 Request Form Also, if you are a Contributor, you posted to the wrong forum. ... View more

The first 2 images are too similar and are also somewhat underexposed. ... View more

That is the correct URL and I am able to access the site. Try again later, or try using a different browser. Could be just a temporary problem at your location. ... View more

The graffiti, as well as the sign on the building, are most likely the reason for IP rejection. This image doesn't appear to meet the criterion for acceptance into the Illustrative Editorial collection: At Adobe Stock, we define illustrative editorial as conceptual imagery designed to illustrate articles on current events and newsworthy topics. This type of content often features images of real brands and products — like signs on buildings, soda cans, computers, and cars — to convey a story. Illustrative editorial content is made available to Adobe Stock customers for editorial use only.       ... View more

You can try, but if Adobe considers the reasons for the suspension of the previous account to be an egregious violation of the T&C's they might block that one too. ... View more

I don't know of any upload limits, however your account does have submission limits. Try accessing your Contributor Account from a different browser. ... View more

You need to review the T&C's of whatever AI generator you use to determine whether they allow commercial use of generated images.  ... View more

I am certain that there will always be a demand for real photographs of real people and real places taken with a real camera. I have been an Adobe stock Contributor for more than 9 years and submit only real photographs from my travels around the world. My sales have not declined in spite of the fact that AI assets now represent nearly 50% of Adobe's database. ... View more

Misshapen fingers and buttons here. ... View more

The dog's fur is very noisy and lacking in sharp detail. ... View more

Instructions on how to cancel your Stock subscription are shown here: Cancel your Adobe Stock membership ... View more

You should continue to grow your portfolio slowly but steadily. The previously licensed assets should give you a better idea of what is saleable. You can also review trends per the current link on  your Dashboard page and check out the Insights tab for Recent top sellers.  ... View more

You retain a perpetual license to any assets you've already licensed. If you don't intend to license/download any new assets in the future, you can cancel your subscription. Check the cancellation terms first, though. You might be subject to early termination fees, and you will lose any unused credits that you've accrued. ... View more