Feature Requests

Currently, when selecting an image in Firefly, there is a “Variations” option that generates new versions through an automatic grid, using exclusively the native Firefly model.The proposal is to introduce the ability to choose which model is used for generating those variations. In other words, in addition to the Firefly model, users should be able to select external partner models (such as Runway, Nano banana or ChatGPT...) to generate variations from the same base image.This would allow: Greater creative flexibility Different aesthetic and technical interpretations from the same image The ability to leverage the specific strengths of each model Positioning Firefly as an open, multi-model generation hub The goal is not to replace the Firefly model, but to expand the current functionality so that the variation system is not limited to a single generation engine, giving users the freedom to decide which model to use in each case.Thank you, Lourdes MolinaiaPulse

The prompt input field is too limited. Please significantly increase the character limit so more detailed prompts can be entered. 

me cobra los creditos pero no genera la imagen 

Hallo Firefly-Team und Community,  ich möchte Feedback zu einem wiederkehrenden Problem geben, das die Nutzung für Character-Design stark einschränkt.Sobald ich bei einem weiblichen Charakter neutrale Proportionsangaben verwende (z. B. „Körbchengröße“, „Brustumfang“, „Oberweite“), wird die Generierung blockiert. Das Problem dabei:1) Die Begriffe sind in einem Design-Kontext neutral.  2) Die Generierung wird abgelehnt, aber die Credits werden dennoch abgezogen.  3) Um ans Ziel zu kommen, muss man sehr viele Umschreibungen testen und verbrennt dadurch unnötig Credits.Vorschläge:- Keine Credit-Belastung, wenn eine Generierung wegen Policy/Filter abgelehnt wird.  - Ein “Character Sheet/Proportion”-Modus, der neutrale anatomische Parameter erlaubt (ohne expliziten Kontext).  - Transparente Hinweise, welche Begriffe oder Parameter in welchem Kontext blockieren, inklusive Alternativen.Gibt es hierfür eine offizielle Erklärung oder eine Roadmap? Ich würde Firefly gern weiter nutzen, aber aktue

quit suppressing the way I use the software I pay for just cause you don’t like it. or else I will end my subscriptions as well as the rest of my teams.

Hallo, ich finde Ihre Funktion "Videos übersetzen" in Firefly sehr gut gemacht! Die Stimmen klingen auch schon sehr ähnlich zu den Rednern. Ich benötige allerdings die polnische Sprache als Übersetzung in diesem Sommer für ein Projekt. Wann wird Polnisch bei Firefly hinzugefügt? Kann man das schon sagen?Beste Grüße!

Hello Adobe Firefly Team,I’ve been actively using Firefly Board for concept development and visual ideation, and I’ve run into a limitation that significantly affects workflow efficiency.Currently, Firefly Board does not include a built-in Elements panel (such as icons, shapes, design assets, backgrounds, and vector graphics) similar to what is available in Adobe Express.This creates friction because: Users must leave Firefly to source icons, shapes, or backgrounds. There’s no quick way to build structured layouts. Concept boards remain image-based rather than design-ready. Rapid prototyping is limited compared to Express. It would be extremely valuable if Firefly Board included:• A searchable Elements library• Built-in vector shapes (arrows, frames, callouts, containers)• Icons and UI symbols• Background textures and gradients• Drag-and-drop design assets• Editable vector elementsThis would allow Firefly Board to function not only as an ideation space, but as a full concept-to-d

Adding to the export option, send to Premiere so that I can do more refined edts on my own

Hello Adobe Firefly Team,I’ve been actively using Firefly Board for concept development and visual ideation, and I’ve run into a limitation that significantly affects workflow efficiency.Currently, Firefly Board does not include a built-in Elements panel (such as icons, shapes, design assets, backgrounds, and vector graphics) similar to what is available in Adobe Express.This creates friction because: Users must leave Firefly to source icons, shapes, or backgrounds. There’s no quick way to build structured layouts. Concept boards remain image-based rather than design-ready. Rapid prototyping is limited compared to Express. It would be extremely valuable if Firefly Board included:• A searchable Elements library• Built-in vector shapes (arrows, frames, callouts, containers)• Icons and UI symbols• Background textures and gradients• Drag-and-drop design assets• Editable vector elementsThis would allow Firefly Board to function not only as an ideation space, but as a full concept-to-d

I’ve only just started using Firefly so its good to try it out. If we are able to have 5 complementary generations then it would be good to have 5 that actually generate a result. It’s a shame there’s no additional  benefits to a current subscriber to other Adobe software either

I would love to organize my generated images into folders for easier access and better overview and better finding of images I want to continue to work on. 

With all these AI features added, why is there still no quick way to select a bunch or scattered clips in sequence tracks (that are in correct timed position) to merge them all into single track or desired track. Ideal use would be when you have a 2hr event with a lot of recorded files that aren’t recorded start to finish of event  but the create multi cam feature scatters those files all into 20-30 tracks and is such a cumbersome mess to drag them all manually onto single correct camera number track.I've been using the 'alt' key (or option key on Mac) and then pressing the down or up arrow key on keyboard to move the selected clip up or down to the next layer for each press of the arrow key.  There needs to be a away to select all the clips from that camera and auto merge onto desired track! 

Introduce a “URL Node” for Boards that allows users to paste external links and instantly turn them into interactive, content-aware nodes. These nodes would intelligently adapt based on the URL type—music, articles, videos, or other supported services—offering previews, playback, and quick context without leaving the board.This feature would significantly expand Boards from a static planning surface into a living, media-rich workspace, similar to (but more powerful than) tools like Milanote.Core Functionality1. URL Node Creation Users can add a URL Node via: A dedicated “URL Node” option Pasting a link directly onto the board The system automatically detects the content type and renders the appropriate preview. 2. Smart Content Detection & RenderingMusic & Audio Services Supported examples: Spotify Artlist Epidemic Sound SoundCloud (future) Features: Embedded audio player inside the node Play / pause controls Track or playlist title

Bonjour, j’essai de générer des vidéos à partir d’image. C’est pourquoi j’ai souscrit à l’abondement. Cependant cela fait 3 jours que je n’arrive pas à générer de vidéo. A la fin du chargement, cela me dit “problème survenu, veuillez réessayer ultérieurement”. Merci de me donner la marche à suivre pour débloquer la situation. Cordialement

i think we need to add search bar in the content from the community because at many times i have a specific idea about special object and i need to find how community use this object in their designs instead of  browsing in all the content

IMPROVE THE IMAGE QUALITY AS IT IS OR GIVE OPTION LOW TO HIGH RESOLUTION WHILE DOWNLOADING

I don’t really want/need it and noone else does either. STOP

Essentially this tool allows the user to submit a VO they have recorded. Then the AI takes it and keeps the cadence and emotion from the reading and applies an AI voice of there choosing.  The generated AI voice keeps all of the aforementioned qualities of the original VO.

I need background noise removed and to be able to hear the whispering in video

Basically, I don’t think Firefly is creatively enabling so much as it is an affront to craft, a threat to creators, and a creative dead end. And it’s apparently sucking up enough resources to kill other apps that are more important to me, like Animate. What would a world look like with a modernized, beast-mode Adobe Animate bringing imaginative and full-featured character animation capabilities to the masses? Instead, we’re getting funneled into a system of dependency on wishy-washy algorithmic lamp-rubbing.I’m personally switching to Toon Boom Harmony and will end my subscription with Adobe as soon as my assets are moved. I’ll be finding a Photoshop alternative as well, as it hasn’t been keeping up with competitors. Adobe, move your resources toward the software we subscribed for or you may not be around in 5 years’ time.

I tried removing several words but couldn’t seem to find what was causing it to flag as noncompliant with Adobe standards. Would be nice if it would highlight the parts of the prompt in question.

I tried to submit a bug report. You say "describe your bug in detail", then put a stupid limit of 250 characters, that doesn't even count correctly. Never seen such a poor bug report form

I don't think that firelfy should scale down the resolution especially when a high resolution image is chosen. it forces the user to upscale for more credits and that doesn't seem right.

Hi. I can't translate the video into Ukrainian. (((

I would love to have an iPad version of Firefly available for Firefly boards. Using the app as a masterpiece of a mood board and creative launcher, intergrated with all of the AI generative features.