Feature Requests

Hello Adobe Community.I have a request for you or, let's say, a super suggestion. An idea came to me, and i wanted to share it with you because it would be a super convenience for creators who work with photos all the time and are quite busy. My request is that in the Camera Raw section in Photoshop, a window be created where we can search by name for the presets we want to use quickly so that we don't waste time looking for them.I would be very pleased if my request is considered by you, and I would be even happier if in the next update, you could create a window to search for Presets more easily to save our time. Thank you very much.

Adobe get with the program.  I tried importing *.HIF files today from my EOS R5 and Lightroom Classic doesn't even show them in the import window.  They can't be imported.  I can import iPhone *.HEIF files but not from the EOS R5.  Adobe's lack of support for import and export of *.HEIF files is pathetic

Hello!I also have a proposal for the developers of the Camera RAW module: instead of using the GPU to be able to use some new functions based on AI, to use cloud processing.In this way, all users who do not have newer graphics cards could benefit from the latest AI-based innovations.It is not fair to ask users to upgrade their systems, only for Adobe programs, if they do not want this, and the normal use of their own systems does not require more resources.Apart from the few who are passionate about buying the newest systems on the market, the vast majority of users have been using the same systems for many years, without any problems.Why do Adobe programs need more hardware resources?Why don't Adobe developers find solutions so that the programs they develop use Adobe resources for intensive processing?It is not fair that if you want to use the new advanced functions, you have to pay twice: once for the Adobe subscription and the second time to upgrade the system so that you can use t

I work with duplicated smart objects so I can work directly within the RAW file for every step. I do that via actions, but actions don't reach CR and so I have to click menu, "load settings", the setting, enter, enter for every smart object.  Thus, I could very much use something like macros, extra buttons that I can run in CR like in PS, that would speed up my workflow tremendously. Even more so integrating CR into PS instead of running it as a plugin. Having to load presets hundreds of times every day (up to 10 per image) is not very user friendly.    If at least there were a keyboard shortcut for "load preset". Not a huge deal, but it adds up!

Good Morning!! Sorry to bother. Does anyone know if it is possible to invert the Raw camera panel, for left-handers? or from windows. so that I can work with the canera more fluidly. If anyone has any tips I would really appreciate it!Thanks!

I have an Adobe account.   Make a portion of the account available for me to input the type or types of cameras I have.    Currently I have a Nikon Z7 but Adobe BURDENS my pc with information on EVERY camera produced, together with EVERY lens imaginable, all except Nikon Z lenses. Allow me to register my camera model into my account and only send me data that addresses that particular camera.    My computer should run much faster?   "Camera Profiles" = 700mb of data.   "Lens Profiles" = 400mb. The same is true under LR Classic "Resources."

0. Have HDR10 display, and have HDR enabled in Windows. 1. Use HDR mode in ACR and develop a photo such that it looks good in HDR. 2. Turn off the HDR button in ACR. Notice sky gets clipped to pure white, but rest of the image looks identical. 3. Hit that HDR buton in ACR again to go back to HDR mode. 4. Tick the "Preview for SDR Display" checkbox. 5. Notice that the image now looks different than it did when HDR was disabled in step 2.   And while this results in highlights not being blown out by default, it also changes the contrast around midtones and shadows. I did manage to find a combination of sliders under the "Preview for SDR Display" category that returns the rest of my photo to how I originally made it look: Contrast -100 Clarity -100 Whites +100   What I would like, is for the SDR portion of the image to remain unchanged by default, with all sliders at 0, and then I just want to use the highlights slider to bring those highlights down a bit to prevent clippin

Camera Raw & DNG Converter feature request:    JPEG Preview needs more options. The current default medium size image resolution is too low, while the full size resolution exceeds the needs in most cases and causes large file sizes.   Is it possible to add two options:1. "high size", approximately 1920x1080 pixel resolution, corresponding to 1080P displays.2. "higher size", approximately 3840x2160 pixel resolution, corresponding to 4K displays.

W masce Zakres koloru brauke mi dokładniejszego wyboru koloru. Czesto jest ciezko usawic dokładny kolor jaki sie chce wybrac a jak by mozna było wybrac kolor z koła barw to by było super rozwiązanie

Up to now Adobe has included every Phase One digital back in the supported camera list. But it's now more than 8 months that the IQ4 150 MP came out and we still cannot open the files. When is IQ4 supposed to be included for all of us that want the best quality cameras and also the best development software altogether?I hate using Capture One. It breaks my whole workflow. Thank you very much in advance.

The Clone & Heal tool is really great. I really find it easy to use. It would be great to be able to rotate the healed/cloned area. This would be really useful for blending lines. I hope it's clear what I'm trying to ask for, any questions give me a shout. John

Hi there. In colour blind and I was wondering if lightroom could have a couple of features to help out. Maybe with setting the white balance and the colour picker. In the HSL panel it could show what colours I'm picking. Maybe have a "colour peaking" option to show if a photo is becoming too saturated. Or if you could come up with some ideas to help edit photos that would be great. Cheers

Add Shine Remove Options in Camera RAW

It would be extremely useful to me if it were possible to change ACR versions quickly in the CC app, rather than with the installer packages (see: https://helpx.adobe.com/camera-raw/kb/camera-raw-plug-in-installer.html#12_x).  This would let me easily use the superior user interface of 12.2.1 and also the masking features in the newer versions of ACR.     Even better if this could be done at-will within the photoshop Preferences menus somehow.

Currently, the preset amount slider does not affect calibration, but it did before, this makes almost all of my preset useless because I and many other photographers use the calibration tab for stylistic purposes, and being unable to adjust the intensity quickly interferes with our workflow.

after updating photoshop , when i opened it for the first time there was option to use camera raw as it is (vertical film) or to change it to new UI (with new look and horizontal filmstrip ), i just clicked new UI to see how it looks , i thought if i dont like it i will just go back to using older UI but there is no option to select older UI , i contacted adobe but person who was helping me just suggested that i should install older version of camera raw or ask for help from this forum , i found it bit frustrating that if there was simple option to choose new UI so why not give option to revert back to older UI with newly updated software. maybe its bug or adobe forcing people to use new UI even if they dont like it

My Macbook M1 (latest PS, CR, MacOS, everything...) crashes randomly when I edit my raw files in CR. Eg. last time I edited 6 photos for 1 hour when it crashed. Please make an auto-save or something like it, because now I can only start it from the beginning and it's soooooo annoying!!!

The content aware move tool is a very nice tool in photoshop.   Would there be any plans to have this feature put into Lightroom as you have with the content aware fill too? It would be amazing and very useful to those of us who prefer to use Lightroom.   Thank you

I've always wonder why, a company that has the most well known software for  photo editing, doesn't have a huge choice of film analog emulation presets and color profiles. Surely the freedom for editing raw files by applying color profile and presets is the most easy (compare to others softwares) but why Adobe has never create a good starting base for editing? I personally don't think that old style, analog film, is old enough to get rid of it. The defaults presets that are in, are just fine, but why not implement them, with a rich choice of new/old profiles? Probably I'm asking too much, and is too much work, and probably also there's always the problem about brands rights, but it would be awesome to have a rich choice of analog film profiles and presets inside Camera raw and Lightroom (mobile and classic). 

It would be amazing if Lightroom had a feature that could use subject Detection to apply a radial filter.    Users could select subject Detection, apply the radial settings, and then sync settings across all images.    For portrait or wedding photographers this would have the potential to be game changing and doesn't seem like it would be that hard to implement seeing that Photoshop already has subject Detection technology. 

I'd like all adjustments to be available locally (i.e. maskable, and ability to apply with different settings). (This hasn't been explicitly suggest yet on this "forum", has it?)

Hi everyone, as an interior photographer, I really appreciated it when the automatic tool for correcting perspective lines was introduced a few years ago. In a way, I realized that over time, I could save a lot of time in retouching my interior work and focus on other things. However, even though it's been maybe two or three years now, I don't think the tool is quite mature yet. Let me explain. When I go to retouch the photos taken inside renovated buildings, I almost always have to deal with many lines. Some of these lines are load-bearing and fundamental, while others are less important. It just so happens that Camera Raw almost always fails to identify these important lines. And that's why I think this tool should be further refined, allowing us to choose which lines the automation should work on and which ones it shouldn't. Does anyone else feel the same way when working with Camera Raw? I think it's pretty much the same with Lightroom, given that the tool is identical. Thank you &

I wondered if there's a way of adding an option where you can opt to either always show the masking amount without also using the Option key or to use the Option key? This would make using the sharpening and masking a lot slicker. 

Hello everyone,   I have a question (or a remark) about the "noise profile" tag that is expected to be found on .dng files. For reminding, the noise in a raw picture can be approached by a Gaussian noise, whose variance scales linearly with the brightness. The noise profile tag therefore gives the slope and the intercept of this linear relation, for each color channel.   There are several methods to estimate these parameters, but I doubt that such an estimation is done everytime I take a raw picture with my smartphone. I suspect that the noise profile is estimated one time by the camera manufacter, and scaled according to the picture settings.   It is now fairly known that the slope scales linearly witht the ISO, and the intercept scales quadratically with the ISO, and such relationships can indeed be observed on the metadatas of pictures taken with different ISOs.  Note that there is a first gap in Adobe's documentation, since there is no convention on the ISO for

Hey,    is there any way to blend the amount of the calibration menu at once?  I am using it to grade my images and sometimes I would like to tone it down.   And I dont want to do it for every slider?    It would be great if we could have such a feature if it not exist yet.    thanxs    Peter